Our calculations suggest that around Antarctica the ozone hole may have
delayed warming due to greenhouse gases by several decades.
Not exact matches
I don't know whether it's because the
delay in our
due spring weather is leaving me feeling frustrated to switch up my wardrobe, or whether I'm just so excited for
warmer weather that I'm happy - buying items ready for it, but either way, here we are, my credit card and I, a little click - happy, a little over eager, and proud owners of some very cute new handbags.
It could keep up with your diary to know when to boot itself up /
warm the interior / defrost and check a central database of projected journeys for potential
delays due to traffic density.
And as we learn from the Skeptical Science article I linked to earlier, there is going to be a
delay of «decades» between the effects of the CO2 emissions in question (i.e., the heating of the atmosphere
due to the greenhouse effect) and a corresponding
warming of the oceans.
Re 9 wili — I know of a paper suggesting, as I recall, that enhanced «backradiation» (downward radiation reaching the surface emitted by the air / clouds) contributed more to Arctic amplification specifically in the cold part of the year (just to be clear, backradiation should generally increase with any
warming (aside from greenhouse feedbacks) and more so with a
warming due to an increase in the greenhouse effect (including feedbacks like water vapor and, if positive, clouds, though regional changes in water vapor and clouds can go against the global trend); otherwise it was always my understanding that the albedo feedback was key (while sea ice decreases so far have been more a summer phenomenon (when it would be
warmer to begin with), the heat capacity of the sea prevents much temperature response, but there is a greater build up of heat from the albedo feedback, and this is released in the cold part of the year when ice forms later or would have formed or would have been thicker; the seasonal effect of reduced winter snow cover decreasing at those latitudes which still recieve sunlight in the winter would not be so
delayed).
The fact that Christy and Pielke Sr. are scientists allows their skeptical positions on rapid GHG driven global
warming to be even harder to deal with when I attempt to inform people that rapid GHG driven global
warming is happening and that humans need to act quickly to reduce GHG emissions in order to
delay and to reduce the catastrophe that lies ahead
due to global
warming.
That one was little - noticed by the world's media, but now its findings may receive more attention, as an independent study by NCAR, published yesterday in Nature Climate Change, has investigated the same subject and reaches a confirming conclusion: in recent years atmospheric
warming has been
delayed due to increased heat transport to the deeper ocean.
Yes, most of the
warming due to the addition of CO2 would be
delayed by OHC recovery from natural oscillation or forces.
That means that even though 2015 is the
warmest year on record for the globe, 2016 may be even
warmer, even if the El Nino ends before the year is half over (
due to the 3 - 6
delay of the global
warming relative to the El Nino).
Likewise the oceanic mixed layer (the top one or two hundred meters of water that is roughly constant in temperature compared to deeper down,
due to wave - induced mixing in that layer)
delays global
warming but does not stop it.
But
due to human - induced global
warming, the next Ice Age has already been severely
delayed.
The oceans beneath
delay the
warming of the surface waters
due to thermal inertia.