The stability of antisocial and
delinquent child behavior: A review.
Not exact matches
Adopted
children have higher rates of
delinquent behavior, learning disorders, and attention - deficit hyperactivity disorder than their non-adopted peers.
«Some of the most important applications have been to the training of retarded
children, to the elimination of sexual disorders, to the large - scale amelioration of adult psychotic
behavior, to the training of autistic
children, to the re-education of
delinquent adolescents... to marriage counseling, to weight control and to
Why the Word «No» Sets Off an ODD
Child Your Defiant
Child's
Behavior: 5 Things You Can — and Can't — Control As a Parent Is Your
Child Engaging in
Delinquent Behavior?
Uninvolved parenting is associated with the worst outcomes for
children: Kids who are raised with this style of parenting tend to be emotionally withdrawn, anxious and may be at greater risk for
delinquent and dangerous
behaviors as well as substance abuse.
In many cases, the expected
child outcomes do not materialize; parents with authoritative styles will have
children who are defiant or who engage in
delinquent behavior, while parents with permissive styles will have
children who are self - confident and academically successful.
The summary consisted of several sentences describing the link between spanking and short - and long - term
child behavior problems, including aggressive and
delinquent acts, poor quality of parent -
child relationships and an increased risk of
child physical abuse.
Results indicated that
delinquent and bullying
behavior were predicted by the
child's trait aggression and stress level.
During middle school, for example, students from elementary schools that had implemented the Developmental Studies Center's
Child Development Project — a program that emphasizes community building — were found to outperform middle school students from comparison elementary schools on academic outcomes (higher grade - point averages and achievement test scores), teacher ratings of
behavior (better academic engagement, respectful
behavior, and social skills), and self - reported misbehavior (less misconduct in school and fewer
delinquent acts)(Battistich, 2001).
In my opinion, Dr Kazdin's «We know how to change
behavior» statement seems to flow directly from his work with
delinquent children.
A twenty - five - year longitudinal study found that when divorced parents diverted their attention away from the
children and towards maintaining conflict, those
children had a higher rate of
delinquent behavior and truancy from school.
Results showed that parents who completed CSP training reported more improvement in externalizing
child problems, such as
delinquent and aggressive
behavior, and more satisfaction and efficacy as a parent, when compared with the WLC group.
aChild
Behavior Checklist for 4 - 18 years; bChildren who are currently visiting their father who used to perpetrate intimate partner violence and already separated from their mothers; cInternalizing problems = Withdrawn + Somatic complaints + Anxious / depressed; dExternalizing problems = Delinquent behavior + Aggressive behavior; Total problems = the sum of the scores of all the nine subscales of the CBCL; eAdjusted odds ratios calculated by multivariable logistic regression analysis; fThe dependent variable: 0 = non - clinical, 1 = clinical; gp values calculated by multivariable logistic regression analysis; hStandardized regression coefficients calculated by multivariable regression analysis; ip values calculated by multivariable regression analysis; jVariance Inflation Factor; k0 = non-visiting, 1 = visiting; lThe score of the subscale (anxiety) of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; mThe score of the subscale (depression) of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; nThe number of years the child lived with the father in the past; oAdjusted R2 calculated by multivariable regression a
Behavior Checklist for 4 - 18 years; bChildren who are currently visiting their father who used to perpetrate intimate partner violence and already separated from their mothers; cInternalizing problems = Withdrawn + Somatic complaints + Anxious / depressed; dExternalizing problems =
Delinquent behavior + Aggressive behavior; Total problems = the sum of the scores of all the nine subscales of the CBCL; eAdjusted odds ratios calculated by multivariable logistic regression analysis; fThe dependent variable: 0 = non - clinical, 1 = clinical; gp values calculated by multivariable logistic regression analysis; hStandardized regression coefficients calculated by multivariable regression analysis; ip values calculated by multivariable regression analysis; jVariance Inflation Factor; k0 = non-visiting, 1 = visiting; lThe score of the subscale (anxiety) of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; mThe score of the subscale (depression) of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; nThe number of years the child lived with the father in the past; oAdjusted R2 calculated by multivariable regression a
behavior + Aggressive
behavior; Total problems = the sum of the scores of all the nine subscales of the CBCL; eAdjusted odds ratios calculated by multivariable logistic regression analysis; fThe dependent variable: 0 = non - clinical, 1 = clinical; gp values calculated by multivariable logistic regression analysis; hStandardized regression coefficients calculated by multivariable regression analysis; ip values calculated by multivariable regression analysis; jVariance Inflation Factor; k0 = non-visiting, 1 = visiting; lThe score of the subscale (anxiety) of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; mThe score of the subscale (depression) of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; nThe number of years the child lived with the father in the past; oAdjusted R2 calculated by multivariable regression a
behavior; Total problems = the sum of the scores of all the nine subscales of the CBCL; eAdjusted odds ratios calculated by multivariable logistic regression analysis; fThe dependent variable: 0 = non - clinical, 1 = clinical; gp values calculated by multivariable logistic regression analysis; hStandardized regression coefficients calculated by multivariable regression analysis; ip values calculated by multivariable regression analysis; jVariance Inflation Factor; k0 = non-visiting, 1 = visiting; lThe score of the subscale (anxiety) of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; mThe score of the subscale (depression) of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; nThe number of years the
child lived with the father in the past; oAdjusted R2 calculated by multivariable regression analysis.
While studies support the logical conclusion that
children, particularly boys, from single - parent households are more likely to exhibit
delinquent behavior due to a lack of supervision than do
children of dual - parent households, there is some evidence that
children of single - father households are actually more at risk for both a lack of supervision and
delinquent behavior than are
children of single - mother households.
In addition, The rate of
children with scores in the clinical range for withdrawn
behavior (31.6 % versus 0.0 %, p = 0.00), thought problems (52.6 % versus 16.7 %, p = 0.01),
delinquent behavior (31.6 % versus 6.7 %, p = 0.00), internalizing problems (73.7 % versus 33.3 %, p = 0.01), externalizing problems (47.4 % versus 16.7 %, p = 0.03), and total problems (57.9 % versus 13.3 %, p = 0.00) were significantly higher among the
children who were visiting their fathers than those were not visiting them (Table 4).
Interestingly, risk factors involving socioeconomic status and
child - rearing were more strongly related to the prevalence (rather than the frequency) of offending for females compared with males.97 Some observers have thus concluded that the risk factors for engaging in
delinquent behaviors may not be the same as those for frequency of offending and that both may be different between the genders.
According to these researchers, some
children follow specific developmental pathways that lead to increasingly disruptive and
delinquent behavior.
Previous delinquency, substance abuse, and teen pregnancy prevention programs have been provided in the late elementary or middle school grades, just prior to the ages when
delinquent behavior, substance use, and sexual activity increase in prevalence.6, 7,31,32 Yet the social development model that guides the present intervention suggests that early and sustained intervention through the elementary grades should put
children on a different developmental trajectory leading to positive outcomes over the long term.
Yet I have never met anyone who believes that violent,
delinquent, or otherwise «antisocial»
behaviors in
children are causally homogeneous.
Laurie Brotman and her colleagues examined IY's effects on families with preschoolers predisposed to antisocial
behaviors, as indicated by having a relative with a
delinquent history, to determine whether the intervention helped reduce the
child's aggression and helped teach the parents effective parenting.44 IY reduced
children's physical aggression and parents» harsh parenting and increased parents» responsive parenting and their stimulation of their
child's learning.
Although on - the - point research is lacking about the
child maltreatment risk for parents of
children with aggressive
behavior who themselves come from families with
delinquent behavior, a strong association seems plausible.
Children reported about their
delinquent behavior and smoking.
Delinquent behaviors, such as truancy, fighting, lying or stealing may arise in response to a
child feeling controlled.
Multi-Systemic Therapy (MST) was created for
children and adolescents aged 12 - 17 years old struggling with chronic,
delinquent behavior as well as youth with severe emotional...
Taking Effective Treatments to Scale: Organizational Effects on Outcomes of Multisystemic Therapy for Youths with Co-Occurring Substance Use Schoenwald, Chapman, Henry, & Sheidow (2012) Journal of
Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse, 21 (1) View Abstract Examines organizational climate and structure effects on the
behavior and functioning of
delinquent youths with and without co-occurring substance use that is treated with an evidence - based treatment (EBT) for serious antisocial
behavior.
At each time point, researchers assessed the
children's cognitive development (including their IQ), their level of internalizing problems (e.g., depression, anxiety, and social withdrawal), and their level of externalizing problems (e.g.,
delinquent behaviors and aggression).
According to Kaplan's self - derogation theory of delinquency (Kaplan, 1975), involvement in
delinquent behavior with
delinquent peers can increase
children's self - esteem and sense of belonging.
This has been one of the most popular arguments as to why
children develop antisocial or
delinquent behaviors.
According to the American Academy of
Child and Adolescent Psychology, these
behaviors, marked by persistent
delinquent behaviors, are classified as a conduct disorder.
Therefore it seems obvious to conclude that those families who are less financially sound, perhaps have more
children, and who are unable to consistently punish their
children will have a greater likelihood of promoting an environment that will influence antisocial or
delinquent behavior.
Although not mentioned extensively in the text of the paper, there is a great need to try and identify those individuals, especially
children, who may become susceptible to certain disorders or personality traits that can lead into antisocial,
delinquent, or criminal
behavior.
A twenty - five - year longitudinal study found that when divorced parents diverted their attention away from the
children and towards maintaining conflict, those
children had a higher rate of
delinquent behavior and truancy from school.
Even before training as a psychiatrist, he did volunteer work at a residential school for maladjusted and
delinquent children, concluding that the complex
behavior of these
children — not only their delinquency, but their anger, unpredictability, and rejection even of those who tried to befriend them — was directly related to their early emotional deprivation.
This can be due to external and / or internal stressors, circumstances, or forced removal of their
children from the home due to the youth's
delinquent behavior or parent's harmful
behaviors.
Children's disruptiveness, peer rejection, friends» deviancy, and
delinquent behaviors: A process - oriented approach
Main outcome measures included the Adolescent Diagnostic Interview (ADI - Light), the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for
Children Version IV (NIMH DISC - IV), as well as measures of cannabis use,
delinquent behavior, treatment response and recovery at one - year follow - up, and treatment intensity and retention.
*
Children are more likely to finish school and avoid problems such as teenage pregnancy, drug abuse, and
delinquent behavior.
Measures included the Describing Friends Questionnaire which assesses association with friends who engage in
delinquent behaviors and caregiver reports using the
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL).
Immediate post-treatment factors predicting negative outcomes (
delinquent acts) were maternal reports of
behavior problems and observed mother —
child coercion, indicating that in families where levels of parent -
child coercion are still high post-treatment, further intervention may be warranted to prevent future problems.
The model fits those
children assigned to FAST less well, suggesting that FAST may make it less likely that aggressive and
delinquent behavior is generalized outside of aggressive classroom settings.
According to control theory (e.g., [17]-RRB-, a positive parent -
child relationship can constitute a social bond that precludes
delinquent behavior.
Even though the included longitudinal studies showed that poorer parenting practices preceded
delinquent behavior, a bidirectional view on parent —
child relations can not be rejected as we do not know whether the
child - rearing characteristics had been influenced by earlier delinquency or other problem
behaviors of the
child.
Indirect parenting
behavior, which refers to parental knowledge and
child disclosure, had a significant negative relationship with
delinquent behavior (ESr = − 0.26, p < 0.001, k = 47, for knowledge and ESr = − 0.31, p < 0.001, k = 11 for
child disclosure).
Parents of young people are often blamed for the
delinquent behavior of their
children.
Child risk factors such as behavioral and mental health problems (overt and covert aggression, autism spectrum disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, criminality or delinquent behavior, depression, school failure, lack of social and academic skills, etc.); family and parental problems such as parental depression, substance use disorder, and criminality, or family violence and child maltreatment and sexual a
Child risk factors such as behavioral and mental health problems (overt and covert aggression, autism spectrum disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, criminality or
delinquent behavior, depression, school failure, lack of social and academic skills, etc.); family and parental problems such as parental depression, substance use disorder, and criminality, or family violence and
child maltreatment and sexual a
child maltreatment and sexual abuse.
The Parent Project directly addresses the following Risk Factors of the Youth Level of Service / Case Management Inventory Assessment Tool: General offenses, Restlessness, Risk taking, Aggression, Physical violence, Crimes against person, Antisocial
behavior, Substance abuse, Poor parent -
child relationships, Harsh or lax discipline, Poor monitoring / supervision, Low parental involvement, Antisocial parents, Abusive parents, Family conflict, Poor school attendance and performance, Antisocial -
delinquent peers, and Gang membership.
Furthermore, practitioners should be alert to parents who are neglecting and have a hostile and rejecting attitude towards their
children, since combinations of these parenting
behaviors are strongly linked to higher levels of
delinquent behavior in youngsters.
Overall,
children who experience negative feelings about themselves may attempt to restore their a sense of self - concept through maladaptive forms of coping, such as aggression or
delinquent behavior later in life (Marsh et al., 2001; Vermeiren, 2003; Donellan et al., 2005).
Because this model of peer contagion differs from the usual model based on positive reinforcement of
delinquent behavior, it raises the possibility that the persistent finding of inadvertent adverse effects of group treatment might not apply to group treatment of elementary school
children if the possibility of aggressive
behavior in the group is limited.
A possible explanation could be that we focused on delinquency including at least some serious offences, while Barber et al. (1994) focused on delinquency that included a relatively limited range of minor
delinquent acts.4 Nevertheless, our findings clearly indicate that psychological control, including keeping the
child dependent and the use of guilt to control the
child, elevates the risk for
delinquent behavior.