Arguments that unilateral action by the United States produces little climate benefit, that a carbon tax will expand the size of government, that a carbon tax
is a regressive, that adaptation and geo - engineering
is preferable to emissions constraint, that economists can not confidently design a carbon tax that does more good than harm, that the legislative process can not
deliver a carbon tax
worth embracing, and that promoting a carbon tax puts conservatives on a slippery political slope
are explored and found wanting.