Recognizing that 38.5 % of women in our cohort had a primary cesarean
delivery after induction of labor, it is tempting to assert that avoiding labor induction could reduce the rate of primary cesarean delivery.
A good basic outline is to section of your plan into different bolded sections: Before Labor,
Induction, Pain Relief, First Stage, Second Stage,
Delivery,
After Birth, and Newborn Procedures.
Labor
induction has been increasing since the early 1990s, 1 and the rate is running at about 20 % for pregnancies at term.2, 3 Induction of labor compared with spontaneous labor is associated with adverse maternal outcomes, including at least a doubling in the caesarean delivery rate, 4,5 25 — 50 % increase in instrumental vaginal delivery rate, 3,5 higher postpartum hemorrhage rate, 5 and prolonged labor.5 Neonates born after induced labor are more likely to have low Apgar score and low umbilical cord bl
induction has been increasing since the early 1990s, 1 and the rate is running at about 20 % for pregnancies at term.2, 3
Induction of labor compared with spontaneous labor is associated with adverse maternal outcomes, including at least a doubling in the caesarean delivery rate, 4,5 25 — 50 % increase in instrumental vaginal delivery rate, 3,5 higher postpartum hemorrhage rate, 5 and prolonged labor.5 Neonates born after induced labor are more likely to have low Apgar score and low umbilical cord bl
Induction of labor compared with spontaneous labor is associated with adverse maternal outcomes, including at least a doubling in the caesarean
delivery rate, 4,5 25 — 50 % increase in instrumental vaginal
delivery rate, 3,5 higher postpartum hemorrhage rate, 5 and prolonged labor.5 Neonates born
after induced labor are more likely to have low Apgar score and low umbilical cord blood pH. 5