Perhaps maybe... I du n no... I don't want to be out of line or anything... but perhaps the FUCKING AUTHORS GUILD CAN WRITE SOME FUCKING LETTERS TO THE FUCKING HEADS OF THE FUCKING BIG 5 AND FUCKING
DEMAND HIGHER ROYALTIES.
Authors who have published multiple books usually can
demand higher royalties.
Not exact matches
Because the print industry will
demand ebook rights, then price them too
high and give you a shitty
royalty rate.
While BookBrewer is known for its ebook distribution, its print - on -
demand hard copy editions, and some of the
highest author
royalties among any of the indie publishing platforms, the site focused on its AuthorApps feature at the Expo.
The self - publishing and make - on -
demand company meets the same publishing need for authors that other sites can offer, but it also boasts
higher royalty rates, low member book pricing, and distribution to thousands of retail and wholesale outlets.
Sexton — under whose direction F+W Media's springtime Writer's Digest Conference in New York will be staged April 5 - 7 (information to come soon)-- told us that self - publishing authors were the ones who, on the WD / DBW survey,
demanded from publishers the
highest royalty rates on e-books and the greatest advances on
royalties.
And I'll continue to shake my head and wonder at all those authors who aren't out there asking their agents why they aren't
demanding higher e-book
royalties and better contract terms.
When a vanity press tells you that they will print your book on
demand (POD) and pay you
higher royalties than a conventional publisher, they don't tell you that the average book sells fewer than 100 copies.