Sentences with phrase «demanded by climate science»

Not exact matches

And, by the same token, evidence that meets the rigorous demands of science is often discounted if it goes against what people want to believe, as illustrated by widespread dismissal of scientific evidence of climate change.

I was disappointed but not surprised by your letter dated June 7 sent to Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos in which you demand to know if her department «had contact with individuals associated with the Heartland Institute on climate, science, or science education issues,» and demanding as well copies of said correspondence, any information regarding discussions between Heartland and other White House staff members, and more.

(05/01/2013) Intensification of Brazil's sugarcane industry in response to rising demand for sugar - based ethanol could have impacts on the regional climate reports a new study by researchers from Arizona State University, Stanford University and the Carnegie Institution for Science.

More interesting was this letter to U.S. Department of Education Secretary Betsy DeVos signed by four U.S. Senators — Sheldon Whitehouse (D - RI), Elizabeth Warren (D - MA), Brian Schatz (D - HI), and Edward Markey (D - MA)-- demanding to know if her department «had contact with individuals associated with the Heartland Institute on climate, science, or science education issues,» and demanding as well copies of said correspondence, any information regarding discussions between Heartland and other White House staff members, and more.

The National Climate Assessment: Draft Findings, Building Capacity, and Implementing a Sustained Process (Video On - Demand) a feature here will be the scene setter by Walsh and cast on The Science of Climate Change John E. Walsh; Donald J. Wuebbles; Katharine Hayhoe; Kenneth Kunkel; Graeme L. Stephens; Peter Thorne; Michael F. Wehner; Josh K. Willis; Russell Vose GC14C.

'' The Guardian — 25 August 2016: Letter signed by 154 Australian experts demands climate policy match the science Leading climate and environmental scientists urge Malcolm Turnbull to take urgent action «while there is still time»

Though the activists have attempted — falsely and improperly — to convey the impression that it is somehow illegal, immoral or damaging to the planet to vote for the Republican party's candidate in the forthcoming presidential election because he disagrees with the totalitarian position on the climate question that they espouse with such religious fervor and such disregard for science, in truth it is not the business of scientists to abuse the authority of their white lab - coats by collectively suggesting that «Science» demands the voters should or should not cast their vote in any particular dirscience, in truth it is not the business of scientists to abuse the authority of their white lab - coats by collectively suggesting that «Science» demands the voters should or should not cast their vote in any particular dirScience» demands the voters should or should not cast their vote in any particular direction.

As an outsider, one is struck by how difficult it is to perform a formal experiment in climate science, yet the question of feedback demands experiments, as opposed to models, to identify critical system behaviours.

They arrived at this analysis by taking a hard look at what it would take to lower global emissions as drastically and as rapidly as climate science demands.

Good science demands we examine how climate changed naturally in the past, not to uncritically dismiss the possibility of CO2 — caused warming, but to understand to what degree present climate change is driven by historical cycles.

Global warming science has become a battleground in a wider cultural war, particularly in the United States where rejecting climate science has been seamlessly adopted by right - wing populism — notably by the Tea Party, the movement of those who demand their fair share of injustice.

Climate science and international equity demand the U.S. cut emissions 80 percent by then.

While the Climate Summit at Doha was largely characterized by a complete lack of ambition and an inability, once again, for countries to match policy with what science demands to stave off dangerous climate change, there was one surprising move at the meeting: loss and dClimate Summit at Doha was largely characterized by a complete lack of ambition and an inability, once again, for countries to match policy with what science demands to stave off dangerous climate change, there was one surprising move at the meeting: loss and dclimate change, there was one surprising move at the meeting: loss and damages.

Publications that reported climate science news of ominous developments were hounded by angry letters to the editor demanding that the contrary view, denying global warming as a problem, should get equal time.

Since the climate science is predicting such dramatic climate change that will require major changes in virtually everyones lives to mitigae, the same type of oversight for climate change science may be demanded by the public and hence politicians.

The effect was to let the public be deluded about such things, by those who hoped that the public would rise up and demand politicial action, while the climate scientists could comfortably sit back, let the wild claims appear to be part of their famously «settled» science, knowing that if the «predictions» failed, they could point to their refereed journal papers that made no such explicit claims, or at least none with claimed certainty, thus achieving sensational scare stories but with plausible deniability.

Then you try to switch tactics by demanding that I find fault with the science in AR5 WG1, which you say I am probably incapable of, and you are too; so basically, shut up and accept that IPCC AR5 is hunky dory and the authoritative unquestionable last word on climate science.

WE»VE now had four major reviews into climate change science, all of them prompted and demanded by deniers, sceptics, [insert appellation of choice here] or whatever other descriptor you choose.