Sentences with phrase «democratic republicanism»

Yet contrary to Firestone's arguments and that of his fellow - travelers, Paul's filibuster is a great example of democratic republicanism in action.

Or that there is little place for democratic republicanism in the culture of English football?

But I managed to publish this without the links, and am adding some to the para on democratic republicanism which may or may not illuminate that somewhat.

I see democratic republicanism as (implying) a form of social democracy, as involving a radicalization of social democracy in certain areas, particularly around ownership.

John P. McCormick: I think that a lack of the kind of class consciousness that was characteristic of the ancient Roman and medieval Florentine republics — in particular, the lack of a thorough - going distrust and resentment of the political influence of economic elites within modern republics — is the single greatest barrier to a revival of Machiavellian democratic republicanism today.

This is why democratic republicanism is as David Marquand has said an austere and testing conception.

The EMA student allowance for poor sixth former's is a good way of «recapitalizing the poor» and is democratic republicanism in action... rights and responsibilities.

John: I'd like to echo Sunder's thanks for your comments on democratic republicanism.

I would imagine that democratic republicanism as a footballing philosophy is perhaps most clearly expressed in the great Dutch teams of the «total football» era?

The latter alternative faced a major hurdle: France's tradition of rigorously anticlerical separation of church and state was based on the assumption that Catholicism and democratic republicanism were fundamentally opposed.

I think he was saying radical liberal ends are best achieved through modernized social democratic means... which may refer to democratic republicanism.

Edit: Democratic Republicanism, Left Communitairianism and Internationalism are going to be the new guiding forces for Social Democracy

I am broadly in sympathy with the general thrust of the democratic republicanism you are promoting.

Democratic Republicanism is more critical of capitalism than most social democratic critiques, because it stresses the importance of freedom for citizen participation as vital to creating autonomy and liberty, and the conflict between labour markets and citizenship.

Democratic republicanism is the new social democracy.

John Cruddas's idea of a co-operative post bank is democratic republicanism / left communitairianism in action.

Similarly, Hazel Blears shows signs of liberal republicanism, democratic republicanism and left communitarianism.

In his majestic book, Britain since 1918: The Strange Career of British Democracy, he divides the events, ideas and individuals of British politics into four ideological types: Democratic Collectivism (i.e. Aneurin Bevan); Democratic Republicanism (i.e. Roy Jenkins); Whig Imperialism (i.e. Edward Heath), and Tory Nationalism (i.e. Marquess of Salisbury).

Democratic Republicanism should take note of rich people and special interest groups being able to exploit participatory democracy to drive forward an agenda of the few, and not the many.

«democratic republicanism `, whats that?

The attractions of democratic republicanism — its open - ended discursiveness — have also often proved political weaknesses.

Democratic republicanism I think has had enormous influence on the changes that have taken place in civil society in the last thirty years.

So perhaps that is an interesting challenge to democratic republicanism?

And even if they did, there are other aspects of democratic republicanism, as I understand it - like building up social funds - which just don't fit with Conservative philosophy.

This democratic republicanism made Crick a fierce critic of the trivialisation of the media.

When one keeps in mind the numerous instances when majority rule sustained such inhumane and unconstitutional practices such as slavery and Jim Crow segregation — as well as moments when presidential decisions such as the internment of American citizens of Japanese descent and the Tuskegee experiments have gone unquestioned — the filibuster remains a practice that is valuable to the preservation of democratic republicanism.