Even though science has not yet been able to
demonstrate much harm to children from consumption of pesticides, why take a chance when you don't have to.
Not exact matches
It can be argued that, although it may appear easy to identify given «free choices» that it seems could have been vetoed without
harming the moral integrity of our universe, what must really be
demonstrated is something that is
much more difficult to establish: that the different world system of which such violations would be a part would in fact contain a significant increase in the net amount of good in comparison to the actual world.
How
much pushback have you
demonstrated against the CAGW belief when confronted by facts that do not support your views: e.g. the fact there is a lack of evidence
demonstrating that GHG emissions will do more
harm than good.
Children Who See Too
Much: Lessons from the Child Witness to Violence Project (2002) Betsy McAlister Groves In this book, the author
demonstrates how children understand, respond to, and are affected by violence, and that trauma created by family members can cause the most psychological
harm to very young children.