No «clean coal» technology has been
demonstrated with carbon capture and storage and no large - scale sequestration projects have been undertaken.
Not exact matches
The DOE is asking Congress for $ 407 million to research how to burn coal most efficiently, along
with $ 241 million to
demonstrate such
carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies — at least $ 900 million less than DOE said it would have cost to complete FutureGen.
Two of those projects, at an ethanol refinery in Decatur, IL and a municipal solid waste incinerator in Oslo, will help
demonstrate the concept of bioenergy
with carbon capture and storage (known as «BECCS» for short), which climate scientists see as a prime candidate for delivering large - scale
carbon removal in the future.