Sentences with phrase «denialist blogs»

This is how the denialist blogs will spin this: Thanks to their speaking truth to power, the intrepid hackers who liberated the secret emails, and the irresistible pressure on the elitist scientist cabal in recent days, Gavin has finally backed down and ordered his minions to release the closely guarded secret data and code.

Eli would be a lot more impressed if Samanta had written the same response to the various denialist blogs and news media that have picked up the ball he threw out onto the playing field and are running with it.

Perhaps a bunny with email contact with the CAS could drop them an email pointing out that the same man who wrote the Heartland Institute's grovelling apology is simultaneously posting on denialist blogs in support of conspiracy theories about left - wing press and communist authoritarianism.

It looks like you didn't take my advice: you're still relying on garbage, denialist blogs for your information of science.

Well, apart from the global average temperature rising... It is not often you see such pure flat - earthist denial, even on anti-scientific denialist blogs like this.

Although the climate denialist blogs have labeled them «luminaries» and «prominent scientists», the list is actually quite underwhelming.

Assertions aren't facts, though on denialist blogs they are often used interchangably.

I think I may have posted this before but when I troll denialist blogs, I typically end up making the following argument: -------------------------------- So we are left with three possible conclusions:

This entire sequence of postings reminds me of the zombie movie, «Night of the Living Dead»: Scientists are falling asleep and waking up as apologists for denialist blogs.

And I would suggest reading the summary report and the whole report before taking a few sentences out of context and a phrase out of its full sentence (from some questionable denialist blog sites).

It all looks so legitimate, and few people have the time to fact check claims in the denialist blog, let alone the scientific knowledge to be able to do it.

Further, we see daily how one paper is brought forward as proof, talking points are shown to have come from a denialist blog, how there is a documented countering effort that is funded for political purpose.

Morano runs the denialist blog ClimateDepot.

Your source of information on glaciers appears to be a denialist blog.

So explain for us: what, exactly, is a «climate denialist blog»?

Nonetheless, Breitbart writer Delingpole claimed that 400 scientific papers published this year demonstrated that climate change is a «myth,» basing his article on a post on the denialist blog No Tricks Zone.The fact - checking website Snopes roundly debunked Delingpole's article, giving it a «False» verdict after speaking with authors of some of the cited papers who said their work was grossly misinterpreted or misrepresented.

2) Steve Goddard, formerly associated with denialist blog Watt's Up With That, cast a blogvote for global warming having stopped in 2002, since there is a flat linear trend from that date to present.

Not exact matches

You can be certain that various anti-science, anthropogenic global warming denialist web blogs and op ed writers (with no scientific background) will take this study and trumpet it from the hills, completely out of context in order to continue to be disingenuous and to purposely mislead people.

Indeed, in your capacity as a self - described «big time» guest contributor to the denialist disinformation blog WUWT, I wouldn't be surprised if you have included links in your own articles, which you would certainly expect «interested readers» to follow.

Someone needs to tell Cowtan and Way (and everyone else like them) to get the f *** off of Curry's blog site and every other denialist forum on the planet.

Publications, blog posts and media stories that try to pin all the blame on one factor should be viewed with some level of suspicion, whether they are written by climate scientists, journalists, or climate change denialists».

My source was the EPA, NOT some «denialist» blog.

Without blogs such as RealClimate I would not know how to recognise and counter denialist baloney.

Thanks SecularAnimist (Comment # 9) for taking the time to follow the link from my name to my personal blog and, from there noticing that I am a Guest Contributor to a «big time» climate blog, which you characterize as «denialist».

The «science» produced by the denialists needs to be eviscerated in very public ways, not just on blogs.

When it comes to the Atmospheric «Greenhouse Effect», some of the commenters on that blog are «disbelievers» (the term I prefer to the non-PC «denialist»).

Can we please keep loaded (and some would say mis - loaded) words like «enviro - fools» and «warmenistas» and «warmenazis» and «stupid denialists» and other terms off this blog's comment sections?

One of the things I like about RealClimate is how easy the articles are to read and understand, compared to the slanted ramblings on the denialist - delayer blogs.

The denialists on blogs?

You said, «Many on this blog are astonished at the persistence of the denialists.

Many on this blog are astonished at the persistence of the denialists.

One of the stranger memes to come from the recent influx of climate skeptic / denialist commenters on this blog has been the idea that the developing world can't afford robust action to cut emissions.

The denialists I meant were the ones who post on this blog and astonish some of us with their persistence.

I suspect the denialist fringe must step up their letters to the editor and blog comments to combat this abomination.

Also, if you could weigh in on whether you think these things are collapsed pingos (which seems to be the WUWT position — reason enough to doubt it, imho) and why, it could be useful in my (mostly fruitless) efforts at beating back denialists on other blogs.

Spencer B. (# 7) wrote: «Many on this blog are astonished at the persistence of the denialists.

And it is reflected in the media coverage — both the so - called «mainstream» media and the so - called «conservative» media — as well as the onslaught of cut - and - pasted, scripted denialist drivel comments being posted by Ditto - Heads on blogs everywhere.

I have no idea what you are referring to, except perhaps that the rote regurgitation of long - since and many - times - over debunked denialist nonsense is mercifully (and no doubt laboriously) deleted by the RC moderators — unlike every other open blog on the Internet where any attempt to discuss the science of anthropogenic global warming is quickly drowned out by a torrent of pseudoscience, conspiracy theories, blatant falsehoods, and hate speech against climate scientists.

Note that the first few of the links below are to blog posts written by concerned climate scientists, whom the climate change denialists call «alarmists.»

Ms Curry allows her blog to be filled with unchallenged denialist nonsense which she knows herself to be wrong.

Morgan Wright is an active denier who trolls many climate blogs and sometimes pretends to be a climate scientist to state his denialist lies.

Are you fed up with sceptics and pseudo-scientists dominating blogs and news articles with their denialist propaganda?

Actually, he's right on the money technically, and you have only to look at some of the comments here (this blog, not necessarily this post) to see he's right WRT the arguments of some denialists.

Sections of this are being paraded around the blogs by the denialists, well, Eli will let them explain why, but you can get a hint from the byline:

Then, despite obliquely referencing skeptic blogs (he calls them «denialist»), he defines skeptics («denialists») in a way that might apply to a couple of dozen individuals (and essentially no scientists) who have written on the subject.

Note also that in their post-Frontline damage control efforts, the climate denialists continued to repeat the «no consensus» myth ad nauseam, including in three seperate blog posts on WattsUpWithThat alone — by the Heartland Institute, its director Joe Bast, and International Climate Science Coalition director Tom Harris.

I'm not familiar with Tobis» blog, but I think it was useful that he pinned a denialist down to making a specific statement that could be deconstructed to show his lack of understanding.

The usual telltales are links to the other well - known extremist blogs, and for me, e.g. the words «Rebuttal», «Denier», «Denialist» usually tell enough to exit the page.

I'm not sure it's an easy line to draw, though there's certainly a difference between searching for a protocol online and writing a blog article about global warming denialists.

The klimate kidz and their denialist supporters on this very blog, immune as they are to good sense, logic, or reason, certainly are a hoot.