The program was a defence of «climate science» very very thinly disguised as a general program about attacks on science generally, particulary loathesome was a casual use of
deniars by a Nobel Prize winner.
Of course he has form so is obvioulsy an exxon funded «
deniar» (sarc off) When do I get my cheque;)!
Yet, I am met with claims of «cherry picking» called a «
deniar», yet the other party provides no evidence, or no reason to back this up...
Am I a «
deniar» to ask her where she got that figure from, or ask Damian Carrington who wrote the story to verify her source for that statement.