Two traits of classical theism were that it either (like Stoicism and Spinozism) clearly and consistently
denied human freedom (in the straightforward sense of actions being not wholly determined by their causal conditions) or else ambiguously or contradictorily affirmed and denied causal determinism — truly classically in Aquinas's statement that God strictly causes our actions but in such fashion that we were also free to act otherwise.
Freud
denied human freedom lest it introduce irrationality into the world.
If
we deny human freedom we make the humanist protest against religion inevitable and so far valid.
One theme that remains constant in this narrative is the fundamental agreement that, as two distinct institutional expressions, church and state must seek to shape human desire in ways that promote public goods without
denying human freedom.
Not exact matches
The strong still exploit the weak, the important
human values of
freedom and privacy are effectively
denied, and incentives for productive activity are undermined.
«One particular religious
freedom issue demands our immediate attention: the now - finalized rule of the U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services that would force virtually all private health plans nationwide to provide coverage of sterilization and contraception - including abortifacient drugs - subject to an exemption for «religious employers» that is arbitrarily narrow, and to an unspecified and dubious future «accommodation» for other religious organizations that are
denied the exemption,» the statement read.
You can
deny people their basic
human freedoms and rights and feel you've done immense good in the world.
They have fought advances of thought, they have tried to defeat the efforts of men and women to know more about the world, they have
denied the validity of scientific truth, they have called into question the
freedom and responsibility, as well as the dignity, of
human life.
There are many Islamic governments who
deny others to exercise their basic
freedom and
human rights.
It made me redefine scripture as a means of supporting
human rights and
freedoms rather than as an excuse for
denying them, as fundamentals have done.
Recently, Richard Pipes, in his book Property and
Freedom, has argued that acquiring property is a natural instinct for human beings, and therefore societies that try to restrict or abolish property» such as Tsarist or Marxist Russia» tend to deny freedom and promote tyranny because they must repress human
Freedom, has argued that acquiring property is a natural instinct for
human beings, and therefore societies that try to restrict or abolish property» such as Tsarist or Marxist Russia» tend to
deny freedom and promote tyranny because they must repress human
freedom and promote tyranny because they must repress
human nature.
Or is the way of Ivan and his theological rebellion one of holding to God for fear of annihilation, but hating him and his world, and with equal passion asserting the reality of a
human freedom that he
denies by his quixotic behavior at the time of the trial?
To start with man as already free, as traditional thought and the existentialists like Sartre do, is to end up either depreciating
human freedom as the traditionalists do to save divine foreknowledge, or
denying God altogether to save man as the existentialists do.
If
human beings could communicate among themselves by direct sympathy, then they would be as mutually dependent upon each other as the body and mind are; and this condition would
deny individual persons
freedom and distinct individuality over against one another.26 Although the relationship between one's body and mind seems to be immediately social, Hartshorne holds that interchange between
human minds is almost never by direct contact and generally through mediation of vibrating particles of air and other kinds of «matter.»
However, they
deny that such
freedom has been voluntarily bestowed by God, maintaining instead that every actual entity (including each
human) simply does possess some power of self - determination.
The ultimate mystery of evil is that man in becoming
human denies that which makes him
human, his
freedom in communion.
But to treat
human beings as natural objects is to
deny their essential characteristic of
freedom.
There is a radical capacity in
human freedom to create realms of meaning and reshape the world, but it can also
deny meaning to existence, reject God, and plunge toward self - destruction.
Christians have had similar debates, with views ranging between those who advocated «Double Predestination», which is the view that God determines those who will be saved and those who will be damned, and Pelagians who hold that
human beings have
freedom to choose or
deny God.
Sir: In regard to your fine coverage of the U.S. Olympic boycott, I have one question: In a country founded on
freedom, does a President, who is ostensibly a staunch supporter of
human rights, have the right to
deny athletes the right to pursue a lifelong dream?
Despite society and the world as we know it having collapsed, a massive, automatic product - manufacturing factory continues to operate according to the principles of consumerism —
humans consume products to be happy, and in order to consume continuously, they must be
denied freedom of choice and free will.
Wolfe wrote, «One of the few
freedoms that we have as
human beings that can not be taken away from us is the
freedom to assent to what is true and to
deny to what is false.»
Only the deer in the park and the birds, whether massing and re-massing in the evening sky or seen up close in the bat house of Dublin Zoo, seem to enjoy the uninhibited
freedom to interact with each other that their
human counterparts are
denied.
Some Egyptian lawyers have been
denied the rights to a fair trial and
freedom of expression and assembly because of broad security legislation passed since 2013, as well as facing travel bans and prosecution for carrying out their professional duties, in support of
human rights.
UFCW Canada argued the section of the Code violated
freedom of association rights under both the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Quebec Charter of
Human Rights and Freedoms because it
denies agricultural workers employed on farms that have three or less employees, the right to join a union and bargain successfully.
By 1911, every mainland State and Territory had introduced protection policies that subjected Indigenous people to near - total control and
denied them basic
human rights such as
freedom of movement and labour, custody of their children, and control over their personal property.
The Commonwealth legislation's authorisation of state and territory native title regimes also
denies Indigenous peoples «effective protection and remedies» against acts of racial discrimination that violate their
human rights and fundamental
freedoms, as required under Article 6.