Sentences with phrase «denies citizens the right»

«Rather, it is an appeal for lawmakers to ignore those differences in order not to deny citizens the right to call things what they want to call them.
The President said that a situation where people hide under technicalities to deny the citizens their rights is unacceptable.
It's also worth noting that the Aadhaar Act explicitly denies citizens the right to go to court to seek damages for the release of their personal data.

Not exact matches

In previous cases recorded by the human rights organizations, citizens were denied access to plane tickets because they failed to follow a court ruling.
American rights do not extend to citizens of other lands you have your own «rights» in canada which denies its citizens a lot of what we have.
In his foreword to Venkatesh's book, Wilson speaks of the rights denied to American citizens to «basic economic welfare and security.»
For example, no government can deny the right of its citizens to marry, but every state has certain marriage regulations: minimum age, one spouse at a time, opposite sex, blood test, a license.
Chick Fil A uses it's corporate proceeds to fund groups that are dedicated to denying your fellow citizens their civil rights.
Doctrine and Covenants 134:9 9 We do not believe it just to mingle religious influence with civil government, whereby one religious society is fostered and another proscribed in its spiritual privileges, and the individual rights of its members, as citizens, denied.
This man can characterize «the fight to uphold traditional marriage» however he wants to — but at the end of the day he is fighting to deny basic rights to american citizens.
Rather the anti discrimination principle is being used to ask that no citizen be denied the right to call something what he or she wants to call it.:
It's the fact that they happily take MY money and turn it over to hate groups who want to deny citizens of this country their civil rights.
We are discussing, in particular, Chick - Fil - a, among others, but especially the company I mentioned because it gives millions of dollars to hate groups... groups who want to deny citizens of this country their civil rights.
In Chick - Fil - A's case they are funneling millions of dollars to hate groups who are working to get the government of this country to deny civil rights to citizens.
Any American who doesn't think ISLAM and America are at odds with our values should only look and see what Most Muslim countries look like, Iran, Pakistan, Saudia Arabia, no freedom at all, women all second class citizens, sharia law, women stoned, gays killed got just being gay, all other religious mininorties are oppressed and could be killed at any time, and deny all rights.
As many journalists and commentators have argued, agreements like the TPP have dubious benefits for citizens of the countries involved.ISDS provisions have been criticised by U.S. Constitutional lawyer Lori Wallach for «empowering corporations to sue governments — outside their domestic court systems — over any action the corporations believe undermines their expected future profits or rights under the pact by reporting breaches, removing online content and even denying access to Internet users».
But don't let the God you happen to believe in be used as any sort of excuse that the 1138 rights, privileges and responsibilities which accrue to all married US citizens be denied to me as a result of your faith in YOUR God.You can believe what you want to believe, but I get to be a citizen unencumbered by YOUR particular flavor of faith.
Don't mess with medicare, stop moving the country backwards, and quit pretending you love america when all you do is push legislation that denies people their basic rights as citizens of this great country!
It is also essential that the Democratic Party attract those citizens best qualified to serve, and not impede unreasonably or unnecessarily their recruitment and retention or unfairly deny to them the economic rights and opportunities available to all other citizens.
For example, if a citizen applies for permission for their spouse to come to the United States and that application is denied on the basis of their spouse's religion, that could be argued to violate the citizen's rights.
Given that President Putin and Russia have enacted laws to criminalize gay people and supporters and deny human rights to their LGBT citizens, they should not be the beneficiary of any trip by your office until they fully restore all civil rights to LGBT people in their country.
However, it did not deny the right of the state to oversee the education of its citizens, leaving open the question as to just how much regulation could be imposed on private schools — or, later, on homeschoolers.
And the problem here is first and foremost citizens being denied easy and low - cost access to information that could improve their lives or that could hold power to account, and this is the realm of rights.
Our nation may have been ordered around the prerogatives of a select class of citizens, but no serious contemporary thinker argues that civil rights can be legitimately denied to a person on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, national origin, disability, or sexual orientation.
Denying these citizens» right to elect local school boards through state takeovers or mayoral control should sound the same alarm as denying them the vote because the impact of the action minimizes their democratic voice anDenying these citizens» right to elect local school boards through state takeovers or mayoral control should sound the same alarm as denying them the vote because the impact of the action minimizes their democratic voice andenying them the vote because the impact of the action minimizes their democratic voice and vote.
(5) investigate allegations, made in writing and under oath or affirmation, that citizens of the United States are unlawfully being accorded or denied the right to vote, or to have their votes properly counted, in any election of presidential electors, Members of the United States Senate, or of the House of Representatives, as a result of any patterns or practice of fraud or discrimination in the conduct of such election; and
The Amendment states: «The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
20th Century Chinese history is, as Lee points - out, the story of several hundred millions of people dragged from the middle ages to the 21st Century in the space of eighty years purely on the basis of the motives of powerful individuals in a society where the citizen must fight for the right to individuality - and even this slim hope was denied under the Maoist regime and the Gang of Four.
However, as our history tells us, there were many people in our country that were American citizens who - for a long time - were not treated equally and who were denied the right to «Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.»
Additionally, I wonder how you have accounted for any variety of negative externalities associated with using fossil fuels — say environmental impacts, health impacts, and the opportunity costs of enriching the governments of totalitarian states deny vast swaths of their citizens access to basic civil rights — as a start.
Of course, it's probable that a high percentage of citizens would be fully satisfied with the proposed AMP, but even if just one percent of citizens is denied access to the courts even though they have the right to a trial, the proposed system would be cause for concern.
Even with an EU citizen father present, the child can still be compelled to leave the EU if the TCN mother is denied a right to reside.
The Union citizen denied assistance in a host state can go home and come back, but a citizen who maintains residence rights under the Brexit agreement and then loses them has lost them for good.
Hence, if a citizen of India is not denied admission purely on the basis of his / her religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth, his admission to a restaurant or a hotel owned and operated by the government or private concerns may be prohibited as the rights of admission may be reserved with the management of the premises.
Only recently, this Court had occasion to declare that a state law which denied equal enjoyment of property rights to a designated class of citizens of specified race and ancestry was not a legitimate exercise of the state's police power, but violated the guaranty of the equal protection of the laws.
In the landmark — if decidedly laconic — Zambrano case, the Court held that the Colombian parents of two Belgian children — born and raised in Belgium and who had never exercised free movement rights — could not be denied residence and work permits where it would have the effect of depriving the Union citizens the genuine enjoyment of the substance of the rights conferred by their status as EU citizens.
If the Premier and members of the Executive Council are permitted the benefit of being advised by a non-lawyer, why are ordinary citizens denied this right?
«Although we may dislike or disfavor an attorney's choice to seek a criminal complaint against a former client in an attempt to collect payment for past services,» Justice John M. Greaney wrote for the SJC, «we can not deny any citizen the constitutional right to petition the courts to seek legal redress.»
According to the Immigration law of Canada, permanent residents (i.e. a person who is not a Canadian citizen yet but has the legal right to live in Canada) and foreign nationals (i.e. those who do not have permanent legal status in Canada like visitor, foreign students, temporary workers) who have been convicted either in Canada or abroad of certain criminal offences may be denied admission to Canada or deported from Canada if they are criminally inadmissible.
In Frank v. Canada, two Canadian citizens who reside in the United States have challenged the provisions of the Canada Elections Act that deny them the right to vote.
The «practicing without a license» is a creation of the bar association in order to gain control of court procedures and deny all citizens of the right to hire ANYONE to be counsel.
They rely on EU jurisprudence denying to states the right arbitrarily to remove their nationality from citizens once it has been granted.
But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty - one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty - one years of age in such State.
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age.
Leigh Day, acting for the two claimants, argued that British citizens were being unlawfully denied their right to vote under the EU Referendum Act 2015 since the Referendum could lead to them losing their status as EU citizens and the protection of EU law.
The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.
45 On that basis the Court has held that Article 20 TFEU precludes national measures, including refusals to grant rights of residence to family members of a Union citizen, which have the effect of denying Union citizens the genuine enjoyment of the substance of the rights conferred by their status (see Ruiz Zambrano, paragraph 42).
Another line from it seems to be «Even the Legislature has no power to deny to a citizen the right to travel upon the highway and transport his property in the ordinary course of his business or pleasure, though this right may be regulated in accordance with the public interest and convenience.»
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z