@YeahRight: I agree; besides, no matter what one quotes, there is still absolutely no reason to
deny civil marriage to gay people.
«The Court holds that
denying civil marriage to same - sex couples violates their fundamental right to civil marriage under the due - process clause and their right to equal protection in the enjoyment...
Not exact matches
So the fact gay couples are
denied equal social and economical benefits of
marriage, their
civil rights are in violation.
Civil rights means the rights to full legal, social, and economic equality, there are benefits when you get married gay partnership do not have if they are
denied marriage.
Since the term «
marriage» unfortunately has been written into
civil code, with all its rights and responsibilities,
civil authorities are bound not to
deny marriage licenses based on gender.
due to some crazy religious beliefs out there in the world i.e. marrying off young children and marrying genetic kin, the government can't ever allow religion to dictate
marriage policy, so have your ceremonies and
deny same - gender couples to marry in your church but bluntly stated your crying and foot - stomping will accomplish nothing,
marriage isn't a religious thing it is a
civil rights and equality thing, thus if the religious win by
denying same gender cuples their
civil rights to equal treatment under the law, then don't be surprised when others use those same grounds to
deny you your rights under the law.
There are many logical and
civil reasons to
deny gay
marriages.
It may be that Maggie Gallagher is wrong to contend that gay
marriage will weaken
marriage overall, but surely that does not make people like her into «homophobic» activists out to «
deny gay and lesbian couples basic
civil rights.»
What YOU propose is STILL marginalizing people, STILL
denying them equal
civil rights under the 14th, because you have some weird idea of what «traditional»
marriage is.
''» will, inevitably, be used to punish religious bodies that do not recognize any such thing as same - sex «
marriage»: by taking away their tax - exempt status,
denying their ministers the legal capacity to act as witnesses of
marriage under
civil law, or both.
At least as long as you do not try to apply it to other people, such as
denying civil gay
marriage.
Same - sex couples deserve the right to join in
civil marriage, and it is simply unfair to
deny them the freedom to make this decision for themselves and their families.
No person should ever be
denied their
civil rights or the basic freedoms others can enjoy... I am fully committed to continuing the process of securing the 32 votes necessary for passage and ensuring that all New Yorkers can realize the right of
marriage equality which is fundamentally theirs.»
In a New York Post op - ed over the weekend, Benjamin argues that the fight for
marriage equality for gay residents of the Empire State should not be compared to the
civil rights battles waged by African Americans: «The same - sex -
marriage movement is not nobly about obtaining a long -
denied civil right.
In the particular circumstances of this
civil partnership, where the parties were
denied the choice to marry in the place where the union was celebrated I would perpetuate impermissible discrimination if I failed to recognize their
civil partnership as a
marriage.