Sentences with phrase «deny established science»

And we shouldn't — but too often still do — tolerate parents who deny established science and refuse to vaccinate their school - age children, potentially endangering every other child in the school and the community beyond as well.

@topal - its really clear that think tanks like Heartland are using the exact same tactics by denying the established science, and even manufactures their own «research» (NIPCC) much like the «doctors smoke this brand» advertising from back then.

Not exact matches

b) Personally, if someone outright denies strongly - established science, I do not want them * anywhere near * the policy table.

Brulle's study established a straw man in the conspirators» $ 1.51 billion in funding to «deny» climate alarmism, when actual spending on anything related to climate science was nearer $ 0.1 billion.

It was March 2014 and climate deniers were still saying «the world was cooling since 1998 ′ — cherry picking in the least - established global temperature datasets, like that clunky old graph the University of Alabama keeps updating [no offense, we also have a thermometer in my backyard — but graphing and posting it does not really contribute to science.]

Christopher Walter, the Third Viscount Monckton of Brenchley, is a denier of anthropogenic climate change and of the science that establishes that fact.

For the past several weeks I have repeatedly tried to discuss real science by establishing real common principles with various deniers on this forum.

The course doesn't waste time wringing its hands over whether or not to call deniers «deniers» — a true skeptic, Cook explains in his welcome video, «doesn't come to a conclusion until they've considered the evidence,» while «someone who denies well - established science comes to a conclusion first, and then discounts any evidence that conflicts with their beliefs.»

Stop booking «merchants of doubt» and all those who deny and distort the established science on climate change — including Marc Morano (Climate Depot), William O'Keefe (George C. Marshall Institute), Tim Phillips (Americans for Prosperity), Fred Singer (The Science and Environmental Policy Project), and James Taylor (Heartland Instscience on climate change — including Marc Morano (Climate Depot), William O'Keefe (George C. Marshall Institute), Tim Phillips (Americans for Prosperity), Fred Singer (The Science and Environmental Policy Project), and James Taylor (Heartland InstScience and Environmental Policy Project), and James Taylor (Heartland Institute).

People have tried to deny climate science in a lot of ways, but it's hard to beat a complete rejection of well - established atmospheric physics.

It is good that scientists are beginning to explore in the scholarly literature whether there might be more storms today, but for ABC to present both the supposed phenomenon and its possible cause as if they were established seemed to me to go too far — especially since it was presented along with saying that anyone who disagreed with the science they presented was like a holocaust denier or a denier of a link between cigarettes and cancer.

More of the carnival barker throwing out redmeat to the deniers to keep their eye off the well - established science.