Sentences with phrase «deny liability in the case»

«We issued proceedings in this case earlier this year, but just days before Fred's death we were informed that Armstrong Cork Co Ltd deny liability in the case.

It may seem like you're saving a few bucks by not telling your insurance company now, but if they don't know about them when they open the policy it can oftentimes be grounds for them to deny liability in case of an accident.

Not exact matches

[71] Plaintiff's counsel submits also that in this case, the defendant denied liability for the accident in the Response to Civil Claim.

In Glover, the defence denied liability and proceeded to a jury trial where the plaintiff's case was dismissed.

A Roanoke City Circuit Court denies plaintiff's motion for additur in this case in which liability was admitted but plaintiff pleaded no special damages and the jury awarded $ 0.00.

Sample # 2: Notwithstanding anything else contained within this Policy, in the event that the proceeds of the Insured Mortgage are paid to any person or entity other than: i) to the registered title holder or holders, as the case may be; ii) holder (s) of prior registered encumbrances (s); iii) an execution or judgment creditor (s); iv) to a non-registered covenantor that is a spouse, child or parent of the registered title holder or holders; v) to credit card companies for credit cards in the name of the registered title holder or holders or in the name of non-registered covenantor (s) that are the spouse, child or parent of the registered title holder or holders; then the Company can deny coverage and shall have no liability to the Insured for any matters that involve the allegation of mortgage / title fraud, including challenges to the validity and enforceability of the Insured Mortgage.

Even in those cases, there could be attempts to deny liability.

In such cases, plaintiffs are permitted to «jump the evidentiary gap»... That is because to deny liability «would offend basic notions of fairness and justice».14

Trucking companies often deny liability in truck accident cases, and in some cases, they even destroy or falsify evidence to avoid liability.

For example, Webber (who is «at the very top of his game») is regularly called on to advise clients on cerebral palsy and spinal injury cases; he recently secured a favourable outcome for a client on the eve of a trial in a case where the defendants had previously denied liability.

Kevin Abikoff, who is leading the firm's efforts on the case, told The American Lawyer «Alstom has since the filing of the lawsuit continued to deny any liability or wrongdoing in connection with the allegations and has over the period of the suit consistently succeeded in its motions before the court in reducing the case to a point where we've reached a settlement that was economically justified under the circumstances.»

In those exceptional cases where these two requirements are satisfied, liability may be imposed, even though the «but for» test is not satisfied, because it would offend basic notions of fairness and justice to deny liability by applying a «but for» approach.

In such cases, plaintiffs are permitted to «jump the evidentiary gap»... That is because to deny liability «would offend basic notions of fairness and justice»: Hanke v. Resurfice Corp., para. 25.