Sentences with phrase «depending on fuel consumption»

Not exact matches

Whether individuals are better off for this quid pro quo depends on how carbon taxes affect fuel consumption.

The 2.3 - litre single turbo diesel engine is also very light on fuel with around 10 or 11.0 - litres per 100 - kilometre consumption easily achievable, depending on load, topography and headwinds.

A lot will depend on whether the next version of «official fuel consumption'tests can be representative of real world driving consumption.

Fuel consumption depends entirely on the chosen route and individual driving style, but one should be hard pressed to average below 45 mpg.

Audi A6 Sedan: Combined fuel consumption in l / 100 km: 7.1 — 5.5 (33.1 — 42.8 mpg); Combined CO2 emissions in g / km: 161 — 142 (259.1 — 228.5 g / mi) Fuel consumption and CO2 emission figures given in ranges depending on the tires / wheels fuel consumption in l / 100 km: 7.1 — 5.5 (33.1 — 42.8 mpg); Combined CO2 emissions in g / km: 161 — 142 (259.1 — 228.5 g / mi) Fuel consumption and CO2 emission figures given in ranges depending on the tires / wheels Fuel consumption and CO2 emission figures given in ranges depending on the tires / wheels used

Across the range, acceleration times for the 0 - 60mph dash start from sub - 5.0 seconds, while fuel consumption is cut by up to 24 percent - depending on model - and CO2 emissions start as low as 194g / km.

Compared to traditional automatic four - speed transmissions, the dual - clutch six - speed PowerShift transmission can help reduce fuel consumption by up to 9 % depending on the application.

Engine efficiency, optimised aerodynamics and weight reduced by an average of 100 kilograms compared to the equivalent outgoing models mean that fuel consumption and emissions have been reduced by up to 11 per cent, depending on the engine variant.

When compared to conventional automatic transmissions at a vehicle level, the Powershift transmissions achieve a 5 — 10 % reduction in fuel consumption and CO2 emissions — depending on application, even up to 15 %.

All models are now fitted with an 8 - speed automatic transmission as standard, and the fuel consumption and exhaust emissions of the new BMW 7 Series have been reduced by up to 25 percent, depending on the engine variant.

Across the range, acceleration times for the 0 - 60mph dash start from 5 seconds, while fuel consumption is cut by up to 24 percent — depending on model — and CO2 emissions start as low as 194g / km.

The actual fuel consumption of this vehicle may differ depending on driving style, road conditions, vehicle options, etc..

Depending on selected engine, the new model will be up to 100 kg (220 lbs) lighter than its predecessor which will bring a 20 percent fuel consumption reduction without affecting power.

combined fuel consumption 10,0 — 9,2 l / 100 km; combined CO2 emissions: 228 — 209 g / km * * Fuel consumption figures are provisional (in some cases), based on the EU test cycle and may vary depending on the tyre format speciffuel consumption 10,0 — 9,2 l / 100 km; combined CO2 emissions: 228 — 209 g / km * * Fuel consumption figures are provisional (in some cases), based on the EU test cycle and may vary depending on the tyre format specifFuel consumption figures are provisional (in some cases), based on the EU test cycle and may vary depending on the tyre format specified.

Featuring an immediate restart with virtually no engine sound or vibration, the system delivers significant reductions in CO2 emissions during urban driving, and can lower average fuel consumption by up to 3 %, depending on driving conditions.

* Fuel consumption depends on the selected tyre format.

Fuel consumption depends on several factors, including roof height, but an average around the low 20s wouldn't be a crazy expectation.

Power outputs range from 90 kW / 122 hp to 200 kW / 272 hp; the torque scale starts at 230 and goes up to 350 Nm; fuel consumption ranges between 5.8 and 9.5 litres per 100 kilometres depending on the engine model and output class, and has been reduced by up to 10.8 percent compared with the outgoing Sports Coupé.

For example, depending on the model variant, the new engine generation is almost twelve percent more efficient: fuel consumption is reduced by up to a litre per 100 kilometres.

Fuel consumption has been reduced by up to one litre per 100 km, depending on the version.

** Fuel consumption figures are provisional, calculated according to the EU test cycle and may vary depending on the tyre format specified.

Those lower servicing costs might even offset the extra fuel consumption, depending on how many kilometres an owner will travel in an average year.

* Fuel consumption and CO2 figures are provisional, were calculated as per the EU test cycle and may vary depending on the tyre format.

* Fuel consumption and CO2 figures were calculated based on the EU test cycle and may vary depending on the tyre format.

Official Canadian fuel consumption is a typically frugal 6.9 to 7.2 L / 100 km combined, depending on the trim.

* Fuel consumption figures are based on the EU test cycle and may vary depending on the tyre format specified.

Its fuel consumption slips in well below the petrol engines with a combined fuel figure of 5.5 L / 100 km, while the 144g / km CO2 figure is equal to the 1.6 - litre petrol and better than the 2.0 - litre which alternates between 154g / km and 167g / km depending on configuration and transmission.

Depending on the model and engine output, the four petrol variants of the B ‑ Class return fuel consumption figures of between 6.6 and 8.1 litres per 100 kilometres on the NEDC driving cycle.

For the diesel models, this means that the combined NEDC fuel consumption of the B 180 CDI and B 200 CDI has dropped by as much as seven percent — depending on tyre size — to 5.2 - 5.4 and 5.4 - 5.6 litres per 100 kilometres, respectively.

* Fuel consumption and CO2 figures are provisional, based on the EU test cycle and may vary depending on the tyre format specified.

Depending on the speed and the mode specified by Audi drive select, it lowers the body by up to 25 mm, to increase stability and reduce drag and thereby improve fuel consumption.

This reduces fuel consumption by up to 30 per cent, depending on power demand in the four - cylinder phases.

* Fuel consumption figures are provisional (in some cases), based on the EU test cycle and may vary depending on the tyre format specified.

Depending on body type, wheelbase, roof height, drive configuration and engine variant, the fuel consumption figures of the new Sprinter vary between 6.9 and 9.7 litres of diesel per 100 kilometers (34 to 24 mpg US)(combined fuel consumption / combined CO2 emissions: 181 — 253 g / km).

Depending on the tires, fuel consumption (in line with the NEDC) for the new top - of - the - range Macan model is between 9.4 l / 100 km and 9.7 l / 100 km.»

Depending on the development objective, the twin - turbo can be designed either for high performance or for efficiency in its consumption of fuel.

The BMW 420d Gran Coupé (fuel consumption urban / extra - urban / combined: 5.8 / 4.1 / 4.7 l / 100 km; combined CO2 emission: 124 g / km) delivers 135 kW / 184 hp with an average fuel consumption, depending on tires, of only 4.7 to 4.9 liters per 100 kilometers (4.6 to 4.7 liters with sport automatic transmission) and sprints from 0 to 100 km / h (0 to 62 mph) in only 7.7 seconds (7.5 seconds with sport automatic transmission).

Fuel consumption on the NEDC is between 29.7 mpg and 32.5 mpg Combined, depending on transmission, which corresponds to CO2 emissions between 223 and 204 g / km.

The result reduces fuel consumption by 3 per cent compared to a regular hydraulic set - up, gives variable performance depending on driving conditions and speed, and allows the steering to be influenced by the car's electronic systems.

Actual fuel consumption may vary depending on how you ride, how you maintain your vehicle, weather, road conditions, tire pressure, installation of accessories, cargo, rider and passenger weight, and other factors.

By comparison, the in - production BMW i8 plug - in hybrid offers combined fuel consumption of 2.1 l / 100 km (111.9 mpg US); combined electricity consumption of 11.9 kWh / 100 km (19.2 kWh / 100 miles); combined CO2 emissions of 49 g / km (fuel consumption figures based on the EU test cycle, may vary depending on the tire format specified.)

Combined fuel consumption in l / 100 km: 6.5 — 5.6 (36.2 — 42.0 US mpg) Combined CO2 emissions in g / km: 172 — 149 (276.8 — 239.8 g / mi)(Figures on the fuel consumption and the CO2 - emissions vary in case of given ranges depending on the used combination of wheels / tires.)

Combined fuel consumption in l / 100 km: 7.6 — 7.2 (30.9 — 32.7 US mpg) Combined CO2 emissions in g / km: 199 — 189 (320.3 — 304.2 g / mi)(Figures vary depending on engine / transmission / wheels / tires)

Audi RS 6 Avant performance Combined fuel consumption in l / 100 km: 9.6 (24.5 US mpg) Combined CO2 emissions in g / km: 223 (358.9 g / mi)(Figures vary depending on engine / transmission / wheels / tires)

A new grand solar minimum would not trigger another LIA; in fact, the maximum 0.3 °C cooling would barely make a dent in the human - caused global warming over the next century, likely between 1 and 5 °C, depending on how much we manage to reduce our fossil fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions.

Phases 1 and 2 together will reduce fuel consumption of new heavy - duty vehicles by 25 - 48 %, depending on vehicle type, between model years 2010 and 2027.

The rate of consumption of the fuel bore no relation to the rate at which the fuel was replenished; the rate of consumption depended only on the «progress» Man made in finding more and more ways of usefully exploiting the fuel.

Our results imply that the incentives to switch to the cleaner technology depend on the relative importance of fossil fuels in the production of consumption goods after the switch.

Poland depends on domestically available coal far more than other EU countries (solid fuels, coal and lignite, constitute 57 % of gross inland energy consumption for heat and electricity) with very little renewable energy production and no nuclear power.

Mazeffa says that, depending on the exact type, winglets can reduce fuel consumption by 3 - 5 %.