Sentences with phrase «depends on convection»

But you're making up the result when you say it depends on convection so that you can then go on to suggest a rate of convection has an impact.

You really need to account for the vertical structure of temperature (the lapse rate), and if you want your model to get a number of basic things right you need to include spectrally grey absorbers — plus the additional mixing in the troposphere (which depends on convection, and hence affects water vapour feedbacks) etc....

I agree that there needs to be included a relationship between dh and T and its going to be complex but I do nt agree that its going to depend on your convection equation to any great extent.

Not exact matches

Place in oven (convection bake setting is preferable) at 170 degrees for 35 — 60 minutes, depending on how thin your layer is.

Place in the convection oven and bake at 180o C / 360o F for 10 — 25 minutes depending on if you like it al - dente or soft.

The major energy input to the climate system is radiation, not either convection or conduction, and since the latter two depend on temperature differences initially induced by radiation, they wouldn't be there on their own.

Wouldn't the rate of upward moisture transport depend primarily on the distribution of convection?

The ability of a band to shape the temperature profile of the whole atmosphere should tend to be maximum at intermediate optical thicknesses (for a given band width), because at small optical thicknesses, the amounts of emission and absorption within any layer will be small relative to what happens in other bands, while at large optical thicknesses, the net fluxes will tend to go to zero (except near TOA and, absent convection, the surface) and will be insensitive to changes in the temperature profile (except near TOA), thus allowing other bands greater control over the temperature profile (depending on wavelength — greater influence for bands with larger bandwidths at wavelengths closer to the peak wavelength — which will depend on temperature and thus vary with height.

Studies with climate models have noted that the ITCZ width depends on interactions between radiation and clouds (Voigt & Shaw 2015) and how the model represents sub-grid scale convection (Kang et al. 2009), but a physical understanding of why the ITCZ width is affected by these processes is lacking.

Clouds too depend on temperature, pressure, convection and water vapor amounts.

Then, of course, you have the issues of conduction and convection which depend on details of the coupling to the hot plate and the surroundings.

1) The calculation of the GHE depends on both radiative transfer and convection.

The temperature of the troposphere (unlike the stratosphere) depends on the surface temperature through convection, so when that goes up due to the GHG IR enhancement, the troposphere warms in response.

But deep water production by convection may be less, depending on how much NADW is Arctic in origin and how much is simply recirculated Antarctic bottom water (extremely dense water, formed as brine under the sea ice around polynas offshore of Antarctica and sliding down the continental shelf into the depths without much mixing, creates a giant pool of dense water extending all the way up the bottom of the Atlantic to about 60 ° N).

Unfortunately, this can not be reliably predicted since it depends on the chaotic behavior of the convection layer of the sun...).

With convection, the lapse rate is pretty well capped by the adiabatic lapse rate (somewhere between 5 - 10 K / km depending on humidity), so surface warming is also severely limited.

The strength of the IR component is determined by laws of emission and absorption of radiation and depend strongly on the temperatures at various levels, but the total flux is maintained at the level required by stationarity by the convection and transport of latent energy as long as the radiation alone is not sufficient.

For example, all estimates of government revenue and outgo depend on some sort of economic model, which superficially have the same weaknesses as climate models: validation issues, adjustable parameters, some key processes (convection, precipitation, human behavior) can't be reliably modeled.

Processes taken into account included (i) air mixing by pressure and temperature gradients down to a few meters below the surface (i.e., the so - called convection zone); (ii) molecular diffusion in the open pore space and gravitational fractionation (entrainment toward the deeper firn depends on concentration gradients, diffusivities, and molar mass); and (iii) a downward air flux in the open porosity zone due to bubble closure removing air from the open pores.