Sentences with phrase «described as a question»

It has been described as a question requiring no more than a knowledge of high school biology.

The best way to explain interrogatories is to describe them as questions you need to answer about your version of the facts of a case.

Not exact matches

The conversation was rather awkward, and as Wherry described left more questions than answers:

As the event's website describes it, Arse Elektronika seeks answers on questions such aAs the event's website describes it, Arse Elektronika seeks answers on questions such asas:

Andrew Chen, who adopted the term in 2010, described growth hackers as «a hybrid of marketer and coder, one who looks at the traditional question of «How do I get customers for my product?»

Fallon apologised earlier this week for touching a radio presenter's knee in 2002 — something the woman in question described on social media as «mildly amusing.»

In an introductory video on the company's site, Stone describes Jelly as «a new way to search,» explaining that in our increasingly mobile and connected world, «if you have a question, there is somebody out there who has the answer.»

Officials who have been briefed on the inquiry described it as having made strikingly little progress in answering the basic questions of the case, with frustrated FBI agents reporting that they are running out of rocks to overturn.

Chairman Lachlan Murdoch and CEO James Murdoch described the media company as a «company that is driven by creativity and innovation» and advised staff members with questions about their family's future to contact their HR manager.

Synovus Trust portfolio manager Dan Morgan described Spotify as «interesting,» but questioned how quickly it might become profitable.

If they're unable to clearly describe their process or if you feel you're being told what you want to hear, make sure to ask as many follow - up questions until you feel comfortable or perhaps veer away from working with that individual.

The billionaire cut off queries about Tesla Inc.'s capital requirements and whether it was retaining Model 3 reservation holders on a Wednesday earnings call, describing the questions as «so dry» and «not cool.»

One additional shareholder proposal, as described in the next question, also may be presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting.

«Liquidity still remains a question in many people's minds,» says Ben Jorgensen, the chief operating officer of Constellation, a San Francisco - based outfit that describes itself as a blockchain microservice operating system.

Good questions, but I don't think there are simple clear answers as the book describes different metrics for measuring the different stages.

In one of those sessions, two representatives of Canadian unions who had visited Cuba gave what might be described as a naively sympathetic account of the role of Cuba's state - sanctioned labour unions, prompting Kenney to set aside the customary reserve of the chair to ask a few pointed questions of his own.

Still, he says that he doesn't want to be part of a party (i.e., the Republican party) that upholds what he describes as unreason, but he also doesn't claim that such alleged scientific truth regarding ultimate questions of human destiny provides answers for public policy.

No one in their right mind could question her goodness and yet she feels free to describe things as colorfully as possible.

The Cult is related to the phenomenon described as «scientism»; both have a tendency to treat the body of scientific knowledge as a holy book or an a-religious revelation that offers simple and decisive resolutions to deep questions.

I'm not sure what I said to lead you to believe that I am «throwing out the most proven and fundamental laws of science» since I'm pretty sure that none of the laws that you mention describe a need for the past to be gone and the future to not exist yet, and I was only forwarding a theoretical possibility with apparently good evidence as far as I can tell to address the question «Why would matter come into existence all by itself for no good reason?»

The interview format used by the Oliner team had over 450 items and consisted of six main parts: a) characteristics of the family household in which respondents lived in their early years, including relationships among family members; b) parental education, occupation, politics, and religiosity, as well as parental values, attitudes, and disciplinary approaches; c) respondent's childhood and adolescent years - education, religiosity, and friendship patterns, as well as self - described personality characteristics; d) the five - year period just prior to the war — marital status, occupation, work colleagues, politics, religiosity, sense of community, and psychological closeness to various groups of people; if married, similar questions were asked about the spouse; e) the immediate prewar and war years, including employment, attitudes toward Nazis, whether Jews lived in the neighborhood, and awareness of Nazi intentions toward Jews; all were asked to describe their wartime lives and activities, whom they helped, and organizations they belonged to; f) the years after the war, including the present — relations with children and personal and community — helping activities in the last year; this section included forty - two personality items comprising four psychological scales.

In a New York Times blog, Ross Douthat notes that Pew created two nonbeliever categories instead of one: the much publicized atheist / agnostic category (which got 21 out of 32 religious knowledge questions right) and a much larger category of respondents who described their religion as «nothing in particular» (which got only 15 right — a bit below the national average of 16 correct answers).

yes much has to be discerned in the book of remembrance, so called OT, for the priest did all go astray from the ways of YHWH, but one must read, pray, and do the righteous ways of YHWH to get His anointment to understand, and call 1-773-874-0325, YHWH Our Righteousness, the Movement, and arm, and Branch of YHWH, prophesied in Jeremiah 23 vs. 1 - 8, and Jeremiah 33 vs. 14 - 21, also as described in Isaiah 59, and Malachi 3 vs.1 - 4, to get any answers to any questions about this book.

When first treating the question of becoming and continuity Whitehead did not describe all events as atomic.

Campaigning for the French presidency last year, Nicolas Sarkozy ran hard against what Europeans still refer to as 1968, describing the post-1968 New Left as «immoral» and «cynical» and defining the choice before the French electorate in stark terms: «In this election, the question is whether the heritage of May «68 should be perpetuated, or if it should be liquidated.»

Thanks for your question about describing the elder as a moron.

Our tendency in modern theology to subsume all the new questions of theology under a framework that may be described as «Christocentric Universalism» is perhaps not the most helpful paradigm.

I am using the term «dialectic» in its ancient and etymological sense, and it seems appropriate to describe the process by this word; for instead of an aprioristic, deductive method of procedure, the process was one of answering questions and objections as they arose, not in anticipation, and not as the unfolding, more geometrico, of a system implicit within a body of axioms or first principles which one needed only accept and then all the rest followed logically to the final Q.E.D..

My question to Deleuze is this: is the (undeniable) fact that Whitehead's prehensive units are naturally open sufficient grounds for describing the Whiteheadian universe as a «chaosmos»?

But... the infinite regress in question is an example of the «non-vicious» type of regress, since it concerns possibilities, and these not (on one view of potentiality) as a definite multitude, whose number is infinite, but as a continuum, which in the words of Peirce is «beyond all multitude,» as God was formerly described as being; and indeed, as we shall see, the continuum of possibilities is one aspect of God which may be truly so described.

The department was proposed by Phil Zuckerman, a sociologist of religion, who describes himself as «culturally Jewish, but agnostic - atheist on questions of deep mystery.»

I described being uncomfortable at events like the Cowboy Olympics, my fears that I would never marry as I was often the only black single in the church, how at times I felt strange or like an alien as well - meaning friends would ask questions about my hair and skin, etc..

-- test the picture by a survey instrument (such as the one described next) that asks similar questions, and by inviting members of the congregation to review and comment on the results of your observations.

It is entirely possible that the question of whether Shakespeare would have been best described as Roman Catholic, Anglo - Catholic, or Protestant would have been settled during his own time with the same degree of uncertainty as exists today.

However we approach the question, it remains true as a matter of simple history that Christianity in its development represents what we might describe as the marriage of Jewish realism and of cultural forms which are not Jewish at all.

Thus, alongside the lofty and otherworldly flights of Indian mysticism, stands the Zen emphasis upon «nothing special» and «everyday - mindedness» and «just being ordinary,» as in Yun - men's spiritual path described as «pulling a plough in the morning, and carrying a rake home in the evening,» or in Pao - fu's response to the question, «What is the language of the Buddha?»

My positions on all three are probably still best described as revisionary (Le, the use of a «limit - language» approach to the questions of religion and revelation; the use of process categories for understanding the reality of God; and the use of symbolic literary - critical analyses for interpreting Christology).

I can tell you that the God of Scripture is exactly as I described Him and He welcomes your questions.

He writes: «What the word «God» means can in the first instance according to its structure be described only as a question.

What you are describing sounds like a simple word flip by someone being inundated with questions about what religion he practices and if he is, or ever was a Muslim, NOT the President saying he is a Muslim as you and SugarKube are insinuating.

I will proceed now to describe what I think are key elements of the proposed framework (Recall that it is designed to help us respond to the question, «What sorts and sources of knowing should we consider compelling as we seek to live faithful lives?»)

Des Williamson suddenly found himself an atheist at Bible college after what he described as «my emotions catching up with my intellectual questions».

It begins where women in theology attempt to deconstruct basic ethical principles such as «the common good» and «the question of moral power and authority,» but from there it moves to the creative impulses we see around us, as women in faith and faithfulness reconstruct the future image and face of the Church as a «community of Christ, bought with a price, where everyone is welcome, «14 as Letty Russell describes it.

The question being asked by women is whether the Decade will invite «the churches and the ecumenical movement to discover and nurture an enriched understanding of the very nature and mission of the church... growing from and supporting a new community, embodying the visions of all persons...,» as the Readers Group describe it in their interim report.

In Chapter 10 we did in fact describe the sacred as that which is special and set apart, that which is beyond question, that which is of such value that it inspires awe and reverence.

Many traditional Protestant churches in the late 1960s and early 1970s criticized charismatic beliefs as divisive and questioned whether the spiritual gifts described in the New Testament were identical to those practiced by contemporary Christians.

This doctrine of freedom can pass over the question whether it is described as a property of the «natural» essence of man or emerges only through the call of God, who reveals and communicates himself as love.

My partner and I attend a community which our pastor describes as «welcoming» (although I sometimes question the nearly unending addition of new terminology).

Theoretical questions of reservations about the law and its application and interpretation are described by Bonhoeffer as devices to avoid obedience to Christ.

Describing the conclusions he'd drawn after years of thinking about the fashion industry as a Christian, he said: «For me, I've often asked the question «if God was boss of this industry, what would his priorities be?»