To do so, they used an existing model that
describes radiative heat transfer as electrical currents flowing within two objects.
Not exact matches
The
heat in the atmosphere is maintained by
radiative processes which I quite clearly
described but you insist on ascribing to me something else entirely.
«The dual wave and particle nature of radiation is recognised, but it is considered more appropriate, and indeed necessary, for an understanding of
radiative heat transfer to consider the frequencies and intensities associated with the wave nature of radiation, for only then can the one - way transfer of
heat be
described and quantified in a meaningful manner.»
As
described, the whole temperature profile gives rise to the
radiative transport, which gives rise to the
heating at ground level, which gradually raises the whole temperature profile (via convection) until
radiative balance is achieved.
The probabilistic analyses of DAI reported in this section draw substantially on (subjective) Bayesian probabilities to
describe key uncertainties in the climate system, such as climate sensitivity, the rate of oceanic
heat uptake, current
radiative forcing, and indirect aerosol forcing.
According to the IPCC, estimated «
radiative forcing» of greenhouse gases (the term it uses to
describe the expected
heating effect) increased by 43 % after 2005.
We show that this occurs in spite of a decline in
radiative forcing that exceeds the decline in ocean
heat uptake — a circumstance that would otherwise be expected to lead to a decline in global temperature when using the simple energy balance model
described in the post.