In a 70 - page opinion, U.S. District Judge Richard P. Matsch released the Denver schools from 21 years of federal oversight and upheld a 1974 amendment to the state constitution prohibiting districts not under federal
desegregation orders from busing children for racial balance.
The school system was under
a desegregation order from the U.S. Department of Justice, and Lakeview Middle, with its high population of poor students, was identified as having vestiges of inequity.
Not exact matches
The district also includes students
from both low - income and wealthy households and also is one of the nation's most desegregated systems, a product of a 1970s court -
order merging of city and suburban districts to further
desegregation.
The study, «Resegregation and Equity in Oklahoma City,» authored by Jennifer Jellison of the Harvard Project on School
Desegregation, examined the assumptions underlying the Supreme Court's 1991 Oklahoma City - based Dowell decision, a landmark decision that for the first time sanctioned a return to segregated schooling by stating that districts may be released from a desegregation order if they had met certai
Desegregation, examined the assumptions underlying the Supreme Court's 1991 Oklahoma City - based Dowell decision, a landmark decision that for the first time sanctioned a return to segregated schooling by stating that districts may be released
from a
desegregation order if they had met certai
desegregation order if they had met certain conditions.
These «findings» by the lower court about the purported benefits of neighborhood schools were based entirely on the claims of Oklahoma City School District officials, claims which are currently echoed across the country by school districts seeking to be released
from their
desegregation orders.
The sweeping anti-busing legislation — approved by the Senate as part of a bill providing funds for the Justice Department this year — not only forbids the Justice Department
from bringing
desegregation suits that could result in busing and limits the power of federal courts to
order busing for such purposes, but allows Justice Department officials to support the removal of court -
ordered busing plans already in operation.
It was notorious for many reasons: First, the court
ordered enormous state and city expenditures, intending to attract white schoolchildren
from the suburbs to the Kansas City schools so as to provide the minimum number of white children that proponents of
desegregation considered necessary for a desegregated or «unitary» school.
Ruling in the Oklahoma City school
desegregation case, a divided U.S. Supreme Court holds that districts that were once racially segregated by law may be freed
from court -
ordered desegregation plans if they have done their best to eradicate the vestiges of their discriminatory systems and have met court
orders.
Even as courts across the country began releasing school districts such as Kansas City, Charlotte - Mecklenburg, Savannah, Buffalo, and Boston
from long - running
desegregation orders during the 1990s, magnet schools continued to thrive.
His lawsuit challenges the constitutionality of a district policy setting quotas for minority students that stems
from the federal court's 1975
desegregation order.
Resurrecting long - ignored school
desegregation lawsuits of the 1970s, the DOJ petitioned a federal district court to permanently enjoin Louisiana
from awarding any vouchers to students in districts operating under federal
desegregation orders until the state had received authorization
from a federal court.
It removed the case
from its active docket while stating that it expected the board «to continue to implement those portions of the
desegregation order which are by their nature of a continuing effect.»
Long - term studies of black adults who as children were subject to court -
ordered desegregation programs, have found significant gains
from attending integrated schools, including higher earnings and better health.
The irony was lost on DOJ that they were using a
desegregation order in an attempt to keep black students in mostly black schools and prevent them
from attending other schools that may not enroll mostly black students.
As for the district's complaints about the difficulties in complying with
desegregation orders, here's an idea: instead of taking money
from Tangi students and families who are no longer part of TPSB, learn
from them.
Yet after years of progress toward school
desegregation, largely achieved through busing and other court -
ordered remedies, the combination of white flight
from urban public school districts and a series of Supreme Court decisions limiting the use of
desegregation strategies have resulted in a widespread pattern of resegregation.
(2) signed by an individual, or his parent, to the effect that he has been denied admission to or not permitted to continue in attendance at a public college by reason of race, color, religion, or national origin, and the Attorney General believes the complaint is meritorious and certifies that the signer or signers of such complaint are unable, in his judgment, to initiate and maintain appropriate legal proceedings for relief and that the institution of an action will materially further the orderly achievement of
desegregation in public education, the Attorney General is authorized, after giving notice of such complaint to the appropriate school board or college authority and after certifying that he is satisfied that such board or authority has had a reasonable time to adjust the conditions alleged in such complaint, to institute for or in the name of the United States a civil action in any appropriate district court of the United States against such parties and for such relief as may be appropriate, and such court shall have and shall exercise jurisdiction of proceedings instituted pursuant to this section, provided that nothing herein shall empower any official or court of the United States to issue any
order seeking to achieve a racial balance in any school by requiring the transportation of pupils or students
from one school to another or one school district to another in
order to achieve such racial balance, or otherwise enlarge the existing power of the court to insure compliance with constitutional standards.
In the mid-20th century, federal judges who were mostly insulated
from political pressure enforced
desegregation orders and civil rights laws in the face of defiance
from Southern politicians defending white supremacy.