Hey, Wanted, what did we ever do to
deserve such punishment, except give you $ 12 and almost two hours of our wasted time?
Not exact matches
There are a lot of people who are opposed to the death penalty not because they think no one ever
deserves to die for their crimes, but because they think the government shouldn't have the power to hand out
such a
punishment, even when that
punishment is justified.
Partisans may be tempted to see
such a result as condign
punishment for the President's misjudgments; they may feel that he
deserves to pay the price for his hypocrisy and cheap and demagogic attacks on his predecessor.
about what sin children who are diagnosed with cancers had commited to
deserve such a hellacious
punishment, he was silent.
However, God sent Jesus to take the
punishment we
deserve to save us form
such a horrible fate.
Also islam believes that if you do not follow the prophet mohammed and his teachings that you are not a true follower of god and
deserve punishment for
such «crimes» Meanwhile christians are just simply waiting for jesus to return and believe that when that happens god will pass his judgement on the earth and we all will die and only those who are worthy of gods love will ascend to heaven and that those who do not believe in christ (who also happens to be gods only son in their eyes) will spend eternity in hell for their non-belief.
Christians believe that «not believing» something, is
such a horrific crime, it
deserves eternal
punishment!
They
deserve the very best form of shareholder value after
such punishment and
such a long wait — a dividend check in the mail every quarter!
As Lubos Motl points out,
such entities if any,
deserve punishment for the sake of the whole field.
Whilst we readily understand that victims who were eventually vindicated would find
such comments upsetting, we think that great care needs to be taken by sentencing courts not to elevate denials, albeit vehement, into something
deserving of further
punishment in the absence of some more explicit traducing of the victim.
For instance, charges of rape or murder probably will not resolve through plea bargaining because most people view
such crimes as
deserving the highest
punishment.
Further, «conduct meriting punitive damages awards must be «harsh, vindictive, reprehensible and malicious», as well as «extreme in its nature and
such that by any reasonable standard it is
deserving of full condemnation and
punishment»: Honda Canada Inc. v. Keays, 2008 SCC 39 at para. 68.
The requirement that a jury determine facts, whether in mitigation or aggravation fact - finding is the province of the jury While I must agree that these rapes are despicable and
deserve extreme
punishment, the process must be of
such a nature to ensure consistency.
If the case goes to court, in offences based on negligence, the court must determine whether an individual acted so carelessly or with
such reckless disregard for the safety of others as to
deserve criminal
punishment.