Sentences with phrase «deserved at least a point»

-- Perhaps deserved at least a point against Stoke, but lost.

4) Please stop this whingeing — you're embarrassing yourselves, accept it, Newcastle deserved at least a point for a tremendous comeback.

Second half we came out with more determination and actually got a lot closer to their players and stopped them playing until we got back into the game — this was needed to stop a complete rout and in the end Newcastle more than deserved at least a point.

Not exact matches

regarding today's match i think BFG deserves to be axed not monreal, he's been decent in that CB role, at least better than he performs when he plays LB, anything we get apart from 3 points today means we have no chance of seeing the arsenal we've alwyzd wanted.

The Gunners got a point at the Etihad against the Champions earlier this season, which was the least they deserved but Arsenal did beat the Citizens 1 - 0 at home last season.

I think both teams deserved to come away with at least a point but well done Rambo for anticipating the pass from Djourou and nicking right at the end.

At least Breaking In deserves a few points for coming up with a new, groan - inducing reason for leaving a character without a cell phone: it turns out one of the burglars is convinced the government is spying on him.

Noting the current revenue momentum, profitability & cash generation, balance sheet strength, and the recent failed bid, the least shareholders expect & deserve at this point is a dividend.

I can understand if he was making at least semi-valid points that needed to be refuted but what have you read that deserves this level of effort?

If a company credibly, and publicly, supports a carbon tax or cap, and if it tries to then sell you an authentically green product, at that point it deserves your consideration, at least from those standpoints.

Ethan Allen at ATTP points to responses that James Hansen has written on the Atmospheric Physics and Chemistry Paper newly accepted, including a twenty page version for those bunnies who busy hiding the chocolate eggs tonight (and a fine and well deserved Easter morning to all:) and a comment on why really really really dangerous was a proper description of the path we are on and how the reticence of scientists is at least partially to blame.

Statements like this deserve at least as much page space as the other arguments because they point out major weaknesses that are not fully assessed.

Without detracting from the point that subscriber information and other non-content records can reveal a great deal about individuals and thus deserve to be protected by appropriate standards (for compelled as well as voluntary disclosure), the voluntary disclosure of personal information under s. 7 (3)(c. 1) of PIPEDA in response to requests from law enforcement agencies, if maintained, should at least be limited to non-content information.

This point deserves an article in and of itself, but I believe it's important to at least touch on it to set the stage for the other items provided below.