Because it is unknown whether design patent rights holders that make false or frivolous complaints could be held liable for such actions, it is strongly encouraged that
design patent owners take care with making such complaints under the current system.
Not exact matches
Any name, logo, trademark, service mark,
patent,
design, copyright or other intellectual property appearing on this Site is owned or licensed by BEAM SUNTORY or its parents, affiliates or subsidiaries and may not be used by you without the prior written consent of BEAM SUNTORY or the appropriate
owner.
«More cats means more sales of everything cat - related,» notes Maurice Meyerson, vice president of Preferred Merchandising, which offers the Litter Lifter, a range of scoops that feature the company's
patented Triangular - Blade
design so cat
owners don't have to shake out the litter.
Except as otherwise indicated, this website, and all text, images, trademarks, trade names, logos and other content contained herein, including, without limitation, the TravelGround.com logo and all
designs, text, graphics, pictures, downloads, information, data, software, sound, video and other files, domain names, web pages,
patents, source code, meta tags, databases, hyperlinks, content and the selection and arrangement thereof are the proprietary property of TravelGround.com or its licensors or users and are protected from infringement by South African and international copyright laws and treaties and may not be reproduced or appropriated in any manner without the prior written permission of TravelGround.com (or the other respective
owners, if applicable).
Microsoft has already
patented an in - game FAQ system,
designed to help struggling Xbox
owners complete their games, while Sony is likely to follow suit if and when such ideas prove popular.
Enforcement of a registered industrial
design likely would face similar difficulties as enforcing
patents, who does the rights
owner sue?
The
patent owner also noted that its embodiment of the invention was «successful,» and accused the petitioner of copying the
patented design, but did not argue that either fact was an objective indication of non-obviousness.
While this decision does not affect
design patent damages based on the
patent owner's lost profits or a reasonable royalty, it is likely to limit the desirability of seeking the infringer's profits under 35 U.S.C. § 289 in some cases, primarily those involving
designs on portions of products.
But the other extreme would mean that a device maker could be liable for several times or even many times the profits (because each of multiple asserted
design patents would on its own entitle its
owner to a disgorgement of total profits), which underscores how little sense the absence of any apportionment makes in this world, no matter how reasonable it may have appeared to Congress in the late 19th century when
design patents related to no - tech products like carpets.
«There already exists a remedy under the Copyright,
Designs and
Patents Act (section 97A) which grants copyright
owners a broad power to apply to the Court for an injunction.
That feature -LSB-...] may appear only during a particular use of the product, on one screen display among hundreds, but the panel's decision could allow the
owner of the
design patent to receive all profits generated by the product or platform, even if the infringing element was largely insignificant to the user and it was the thousands of other features -LSB-...] that drove the demand generating those profits.»
In principle, the
owner of a registered industrial
design or of a
design patent has the right to prevent third parties from making, selling or importing articles bearing or embodying a
design which is a copy, or substantially a copy, of the protected
design, when such acts are undertaken for commercial purposes.
That's very frustrating, especially with Samsung's latest
design patent where something is purposely shown and yet we're left completely in the dark as to what functionality it could possibly bring to future
owners.
The rest of the
design accommodates all previous
patent specs for Google Glass including built - in cellular data connectivity standards so as to allow Google Glass
owners to access the web directly without the need of doing so via an Android smartphone.