These authors explored some of the challenges and promises in terms of using and
designing standardized achievement tests and other educational tests that are «instructionally useful.»
Not exact matches
The
design of this study made it possible to examine 1) the extent to which benefits of breastfeeding on cognitive ability and
achievement were evident throughout middle childhood, adolescence, and into young adulthood; and 2) the extent to which breastfeeding was related to a range of indices of academic
achievement that included performance on
standardized tests, teacher ratings of academic
achievement, and levels of success in examinations on leaving school.
To the extent the program involves student
achievement, it bases awards on «student learning objectives» as «created by individual teachers, with the approval of site - based administrators»; these objectives «will be measured by a combination of existing assessment instruments, and teacher
designed tools,» as well as by state
standardized tests.
And if the underlying measure of student
achievement in these studies was
standardized tests, as was surely the case in many of them, why are such
tests acceptable as measures of teacher quality in studies that are meta - analyzed and used indirectly, but unacceptable when they are used directly to assess teacher quality in a structured research
design?
The corporate world provides useful data about simulations
designed to change behavior and obtain results (which is exactly what we hope will be learned in many situations but is something that few, if any, of our
standardized achievement tests measure).
-- Overall Student Performance
Standardized tests are not
designed to be the single determinant of a student's
achievement and knowledge.
Achievement tests are typically
standardized, and
designed to measure subject and grade - level specific knowledge.
Standardized tests, benchmark assessments (often designed to see how students are progressing towards achievement on a standardized test), and end - of - course assessments are more about evaluating teaching and
Standardized tests, benchmark assessments (often
designed to see how students are progressing towards
achievement on a
standardized test), and end - of - course assessments are more about evaluating teaching and
standardized test), and end - of - course assessments are more about evaluating teaching and instruction.
Hill, Ball and Brian Rowan find only modest links between measures of the mathematical knowledge that teachers need for teaching and their students» performance on
standardized math
tests, and the vaunted Measures of Effective Teaching project had to abandon its content knowledge for teaching measures,
designed to assess some aspects of pedagogical content knowledge, as they were not associated with student
achievement.
According to the technical manuals published by the creators of
standardized assessments, none of the
tests currently in use to judge teacher or school administrator effectiveness or student
achievement have been validated for those uses... The
tests are simply not
designed to diagnose learning.
If you were to
design a comparative study of differences in student
achievement between school environments that use annual
standardized tests and those that do not, what measures of
achievement or other outcomes would you examine to reveal differences, and why?
The Woodcock Johnson
Test of Student
Achievement, the Peabody Individual
Achievement Test and the KeyMath 3 Diagnostic Assessment are a few of the
tests designed to be administered in individual sessions, and provide grade equivalent,
standardized and age equivalent scores as well as diagnostic information that is helpful when preparing to
design an IEP and an educational program.
The new law requires states to
design rating systems that rely heavily on student
achievement, including proficiency rates on
standardized math and reading
tests, year - to - year growth on those
tests and graduation rates.
Using any
standardized achievement test for a purpose for which it was not
designed violates nationally - accepted standards of the
testing profession, of the state of Illinois and the U. S. Department of Education, and the guidelines of the test makers themselves (see Attachment 2 — PURE Fact Sheet: «Testing professionals oppose use of standardized test scores as sole or primary measures in high - stakes decisions&r
testing profession, of the state of Illinois and the U. S. Department of Education, and the guidelines of the
test makers themselves (see Attachment 2 — PURE Fact Sheet: «
Testing professionals oppose use of standardized test scores as sole or primary measures in high - stakes decisions&r
Testing professionals oppose use of
standardized test scores as sole or primary measures in high - stakes decisions»).
Using any
standardized achievement test for a purpose for which it was not
designed violates nationally - accepted standards of the
testing profession, of the state of Illinois and the U. S. Department of Education, and the guidelines of the
test makers themselves -LRB-