Not exact matches
Perhaps due to the natural
desire to tone down criticism
in written documents and perhaps because some of us wonder what else can be said — e.g. WGI is «becoming a bit repetitive and may have little original to say other than «we told you so last time and mean it even more now!»»
If you believe that «the internet» begins when the
document is released by the judge, I suggest it can only mean that the
desired publication and dissemination standard must be understood at the time it is released... and, ideally, that the judge has taken full account of the public interest
in the details of the case at the time the ruling is
written.
Tell your clients that, if they want to have paper
documents preserved, they need to inform you
in writing of that
desire, and arrange to have the paper picked up.
Write your resume and social media profiles to be forward looking
document that catalogues how your accomplishments are
in alignment with results
desired by the prospective employer.
Drafting a well
written letter or structuring a
document properly can make all the difference
in regards to achieving your
desired results.