The question is whether it is right to
destroy innocent human lives.
It will eventually
destroy innocent human lives (such as unborn children and religious minorities) and bring strifes among people one way or another because of the shedding of innocent blood.
Since it is always morally wrong to
destroy innocent human life, persons who are ordered to do so by doctors or state officials have a duty to object in conscience and to refuse compliance.
Not exact matches
God's covenant with Noah which asks fallen humanity to establish a society based on reverence for
life and a legal justice that protects the
innocent human beings from the murderer who is around; and God's call to Moses to liberate the Israelite people from Pharaoh's slavery; and God permitting monarchy with new perils of oligarchy to
destroy the more
human Tribal Federation to liberate the Israelites from the technically superior Philistines in Palestine; and Paul's doctrine that the Roman State, which he knew had its role in crucifying Jesus.
«No - one has the right to
destroy the
life of any
innocent human being from fertilisation to natural death.»
Just a thought experiment (covering the missing
human part): If you were a sub commander in charge of ICBMs and you learned your country was
destroyed, and took the time to verify (days perhaps because you have no communication) and you are somewhat certain but not perfectly certain as to who did the attack, and your state no longer supports
life, and your head of state is gone, do you fire your weapons killing millions of
innocent people?
My climate enemies have done scientific and other academic frauds; they've
destroyed, withheld and pretended to misplace scientific data in order to prevent the
human race discovering things about nature; they've forged documents to frame people they don't like; mendaciously and publicly accused
innocent people of deplorable crimes that carry prison sentences; betrayed the trust reposed in their professions by fraudulently abrogating to themselves the magical competence to diagnose entire swathes of the (perfectly healthy) population with thought disorders just to score points in an academic bitch fight; deliberately and self - servingly lied to * massive * audiences about the way science itself works — than which I can't for the
life of me think of a greater crime against humanity in the recent history of the developed world, can you Joe?