Sentences with phrase «destruction of another human being»

With the bright laughter of the Gulling Scene, or with the destruction of a human being, and his dark oath, «I'll be revenged on the whole pack of you»?

Obama's policy is bad ethics because it creates further incentives for the destruction of human beings in their very earliest stage of life.

Removing the stem cells requires the destruction of the embryo, which some people liken to destruction of a human being.

They want to be the screaming mob that cheers at the destruction of another human being.

Not exact matches

The loss of human life and destruction of property lingered on minds across the world, but a decade - long effort to lure innovative technology firms to the South American country was also at stake.

These are not your father's plutocrats, these «human tech stocks of our economy, prone to violent swings and rapid cycles of value creation and destruction.»

The outcome of a war will not only lead to a sharp escalation in human casualties and displaced families, who have yet to come to terms with the death and destruction from the conflicts in Iraq, Yemen and Syria, but the region itself may no longer be the landscape it currently is as most countries in the area will struggle to recuperate from the large - scale devastation caused by a war.

With A.I.'s ability to learn human speech patterns (think of Siri or Google's Cortana), and adaptability to human wants and needs, as well as their living habits (think Alexa or the Google Home), Elon Musk is firm in his conviction that A.I. will only bring destruction.

Two questions come immediately to mind: (I) whether real human kindness and sympathy are, or can be, encountered in the slaughterhouse, in the circus and the rodeo, in the forced captivity of wild animals in zoos, and in pain research in biomedical laboratories, and (2) whether our abuse and destruction of members of other sentient species for our benefit alone can be a truly moral goal for mankind.

Ms Rudd said the conflict in Syria has caused «unparalleled suffering, destruction and disregard for human life» and driven thousands of refugees and migrants towards Europe.

For that matter, even when perfected, this method will always involve the destruction of a human embryo, the one whose nucleus is removed.

Although the Nazis ultimately intended the destruction of a far larger segment of humankind than just the Jews, their murder of Jews was precisely because they were Jews, not undifferentiated «human beings.»

Far from condoning every destruction of nature that is executed in the name of human purposes, the maximal happiness principle prescribes such sacrifice only when the human possibilities are thereby greater than they would otherwise be.

In Jeremiah's time the people's understanding of kingship was tainted by human kings who had led them to the point of imminent destruction and deportation.

We are witness of a savage destruction of historic human values and experiences at our base - level communities in the villages, in the localities and towns.

And human beings can adjust to losses in ways that lead to more humane relationships among them instead of mutual destruction.

For the first time since the destruction of the Temple, Jews and Christians are working respectfully together to unravel the human mystery behind this Jesus acclaimed as the Christ.

For instance, the steady destruction of our natural forests, pasture lands and inland coastal water bodies has not only meant increased economic poverty for millions of tribals, nomads and traditional fisherfolk, but also a slow cultural and social death: a dismal change from rugged self - sufficient human beings to abjectly dependent landless laborers and squalor - stricken urban migrants.

And in his annual Message for the World Day of Peace on 1 January 2009, Benedict XVI noted: «The extermination of millions of unborn children, in the name of the fight against poverty, actually constitutes the destruction of the poorest of all human beings.»

... as you stated in another post «By inspiring the human authors to write what they did, God made it look like He was the one responsible for the actions of Israel, the destruction of the flood, the murder of the firstborn males of Israel, and the slaughter of Canaanite women and children.

For others (myself included), the destruction of developing human beings for research is simply unethical as a matter of principle and should not be supported.

It's always nice to see that humans are capable of creation and not just destruction.

It is no exaggeration to say that human beings today experience life in terms of disruption, conflict, self - destruction, meaninglessness and despair in all realms of life.

The term «kill» is loaded because you wouldn't call it «killing» when a guy doesn't protect every single sperm — yet, it is destruction of human life.

To violate this fidelity in marriage is to run incredible and enormous risks of destruction of essential human meaning.

Oh, the Calvinists could make perfect sense of it all with a wave of a hand and a swift, confident explanation about how Zarmina had been born in sin and likely predestined to spend eternity in hell to the glory of an angry God (they called her a «vessel of destruction»); about how I should just be thankful to be spared the same fate since it's what I deserve anyway; about how the Asian tsunami was just another one of God's temper tantrums sent to remind us all of His rage at our sin; about how I need not worry because «there is not one maverick molecule in the universe» so every hurricane, every earthquake, every war, every execution, every transaction in the slave trade, every rape of a child is part of God's sovereign plan, even God's idea; about how my objections to this paradigm represented unrepentant pride and a capitulation to humanism that placed too much inherent value on my fellow human beings; about how my intuitive sense of love and morality and right and wrong is so corrupted by my sin nature I can not trust it.

Because of this, today more than ever before, our science and technology must be directed away from the paths of destruction and into the search for the conditions demanded for the creation of human good.

To completely correct or repair the damage done at the moment in time that the evil deed was done, would take a divine altering of history and the destruction of every human.

We now know that nature can not take care of itself, that human beings can degrade it not only locally but globally, that the species God created and saved from the flood are threatened by human expansion into their habitats, destruction of their food supplies, pollution of their air and water, and excessive hunting and fishing.

BTW... the «babies» Jesus drowned in the flood were nephilim: angel (or celestial beings in general) and human hybrid which created a race of barbaric giants wreaking destruction upon the earth.

This is most certainly part of the New Age Secularism given birth by the excesses of America's «Golden Age» of fantastic prosperity, fed by the «Cheap Oil Era», now fading away leaving irreparable damage and carnage, destruction of the human spirit behind.

Schleiermacher extols childhood as a «pure revelation of the divine from which no conversion is necessary,» but he realized that «nature had also implanted the inclinations and proclivities that could lead to human destruction» and, therefore, never failed to emphasize the duty of adults to nurture children.

Nevertheless, the faith that God is the Lord of history; that even atomic energy is God's energy to be used for human good and not for mutual destruction; that no nation is sovereign in its own right but that God alone is the sovereign Ruler of the world — such a faith makes a vast difference in the way we deal with political issues.

If there is a particular correspondence in Abraham to the first Israel (Exodus and Settlement) and in Jacob to the second (the period of the Kingdoms), something of the same correspondence is to be seen in Joseph to the third Israel, to her profound hope that out of willful intention of evil, out of the consequent judgment of destruction and tragedy, God would yet through human means raise up the tribes of Jacob and bring his light of redemption to all the earth.

In this passage, Zeus prepares to set in motion a play of human carnage: The blood is a sign of coming destruction from his pitiless hand.

But the destruction of trust in human existence is the inner poisoning of the total human organism from which this sickness stems.

However, in the rural areas in the northeast and the north, there is a totally different world where people suffer from economic deprivation and environmental destruction - in other words, all kinds of human rights violations.

The same spirit in modernization has, along with missions of service to universal humanity making human life richer and fuller, produced also a good deal of power - crusades for conquest which has found expression in technology being used in the service of colonialism and transnational and national economic exploitation, totalitarian statism and destruction of nature.

His good creation was not intended to function this way, but since He gave humans, angels, and even animals (to a degree) the freedom to make genuine choices, we sometimes use this freedom in ways that are contrary to the will and desire of God, and when we do this, the forces of nature suffer the consequences, and chaos rages over the face of earth, wreaking havoc, destroying lives, and bringing destruction in its wake.

If Edwards's God is not with us, what meaning is there in our agreement with his propositions about human wickedness, human determinism, about the threat of destruction?

(Gen. 6:3) The tyrannies and destructions of our day are really the same in kind as those that made human life either a shambles or a prison house, or both, in the days of Nero when this earliest Gospel was written.

It is in this sense» and only this sense» that the stem - cell wars are over: The central cause of battle, the destruction of human embryos, is no longer necessary or even most useful.

Yes, for all you Muslim lovers out there, for all you Islamists that would die for your religion, for all you weak lillly livered Muslims that flee your own country to live in ours and swear to its destruction, for all you hipocrites that claim to be in a religion of tolerance and peace but live by your actions of murder and unspeakable horrors, you Iranians, you Afghans, you Pakistanis, you Iragis, you misfits and abhorents of any god, this story of a simple Christian, who is now denied his life because of stupid and educaied cowards in Iran, cowards and murderers who covet children and lust hiding behind a demonic religion, let this man be your true martyr because you are not human and can not touch him.

Christianity, they say, is a religion of crisis, a judgment which regards even the highest achievements of human culture as vitiated by man's fallen nature and doomed to destruction.»

On the contrary, there is a much more imminent threat of human self - destruction through nuclear war.

In wartime the GNP soars; nothing is subtracted for the destruction of cities and infrastructure, much less for the loss of human life.

Hence the destruction of human community and the deterioration of human relations that accompany the expansion of the market are not considered to be losses.

If you wonder why storms and destruction happen in nature, much of it is because the forces of nature are no longer under human control.

According to the passage, not even military objectives can justify the destruction of the natural resources which sustain human community, nor any more destruction of wild (non-fruiting) nature than is essential to those ends.

The question at issue is rather this: Which of these two revelations has the power to transform the lives of men to save them from self - destruction and bring them to the fullest actualization of the constructive potentialities of human existence?