Sentences with phrase «destruction of the flesh»

So the destruction of the flesh would not be physical death, but the process of learning to defeat temptation and sin.

So for this reason, it seems that handing a person over to Satan for the destruction of his flesh refers to something else.

In 1 Corinthians 5:5 and 1 Timothy 1:20, Paul says he hands people over to Satan for the destruction of their flesh.

In 1 Corinthians 5:1 - 5 you see an example of one being delivered to Satan «for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus».

This individual being delivered unto Satan didn't result in loss of salvation, but in the destruction of his flesh, yet his spirit remains saved.

Paul is not saying that the destruction of the flesh by Satan necessarily leads to salvation.

Why didn't you reference 1 Corinthians 5:5 «To deliver such an one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus.»

Paul instructs the believers in Corinth to hand a man over to Satan for the destruction of his flesh (1 Cor 5:5).

When Paul passed sentence on the incestuous Corinthian, «You are to deliver this man to Satan for the destruction of his flesh» (I Cor 5:5) he was acting in accordance with the Mosaic code of herem or expulsion from the community.

Why, when the translators render «flesh» so adroitly over and over, do they leave it in I Corinthians 5:5, where «the destruction of the flesh» looks like, and has been taken by commentators to mean, ritual execution?

To deliver such an one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus.

4 When you are assembled in the name of the Lord Jesus and my spirit is present, with the power of our Lord Jesus, 5 you are to deliver this man to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, so that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord...

They are not among the «trivial cases» being taken to court that he refers to in 6:2; on the contrary, he goes so far as to instruct perpetrators to be handed over «to Satan for the destruction of the flesh» (5:5).

http://www.macarthurcommentaries.com I have decided to deliver such a one to Satan for the destruction of his flesh, that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus.

Not exact matches

2 Corinthians 10:3 — 4 comes to mind: «For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war according to the flesh, for the weapons of our warfare are not of the flesh, but divinely powerful for the destruction of fortresses.»

The mark of the beast is spiritual, and identical to the pledged of allegiance to the flag, because worshipping doesn't come from a chip, or any technology device, although we are surrounded by human devices... The name of the beast is going to be written in the heart, or in the mind on those who worship the beast, because worshipping is of the heart, or of the mind... When the Germans used their right hand to pledge allegiance to the flag, or to Hitler, there was no physical mark in the right hand, or forehead of the German pledger, because the pledge of allegiance to the flag, or to Hitler, was written in the heart, or in the mind of the German pledger... When the US uses their right hand to pledge allegiance to the flag, there is no physical mark in the right hand, or on the forehead of the pledger, because the pledge of allegiance to the flag, is written in the heart, or in the mind of the pledger... The devil uses Romans 13 to deceive those who are pledging allegiance to the flag, because they do not believe what God said in Ex.20: 1 - 5, and De.4: 15 - 19... When a person pledges allegiance to a man, or to a flag, or to a nation, they are heading for destruction, because God said; «cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and make flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the LORD Jer.17: 5 KJV... Whatever happened to the Germans who trusted in Hitler, or on their military power?

We can not be sure that The Flood had no relationship to all flesh around that area having «corrupted its way»... The very protection of mankind from natural disasters that were inevitable from the contingent, limited perfection of the planet Earth as a habitat, might well have been mediated to human communities by great prophetic souls, even as Christ prophesied the destruction of Jerusalem as a consequence of his rejection, and because «in the day of your visitation, you did not know the things that were to your peace».

For if God did not spare the angels who sinned, but cast them down to hell and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved for judgment; and did not spare the ancient world, but saved Noah, one of eight people, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood on the world of the ungodly; and turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah into ashes, condemned them to destruction, making them an example to those who afterward would live ungodly; and delivered righteous Lot, who was oppressed by the filthy conduct of the wicked (for that righteous man, dwelling among them, tormented his righteous soul from day to day by seeing and hearing their lawless deeds) then the Lord knows how to deliver the godly out of temptations and to reserve the unjust under punishment for the day of judgment, and especially those who walk according to the flesh in the lust of uncleanness and despise authority.

«He is our repose as the one freeing the law from the contingent slavery in the flesh during the present life; our healing, as the one healing [us] of the affliction of death and destruction through his Resurrection; our grace, as the distributor of sonship in the Spirit by God the Father through faith, and of the grace of divinisation for each one according to worthiness.»

Dr. Wentz fleshes out a probable mechanism, whereby their newfound energy is derived from iodine - induced thyroid tissue destruction and the liberation of thyroid hormone into the circulation (26).

The camera craves naive, untainted flesh on the brink of destruction — or in other words, «that whole deer in the headlights thing», as worldly wise make - up artist Ruby (Jena Malone) puts it to tremulous ingenue Jesse (Super 8 and Maleficent's Elle Fanning), who responds by doing a very serviceable impression of just that.

Fleisch (German for «flesh» and «meat») muses over the phenomenon of extreme sexual transgression, where desire seeps into violence and self - destruction.