At «SCOTUSblog,» Lyle Denniston has a post titled «Court gives
detainees habeas rights.»
Not exact matches
Voted YES on loosening restrictions on cell phone wiretapping Voted NO on preserving
habeas corpus for Guantanamo
detainees.
Take the denial of
habeas corpus rights to Guantanamo
detainees.
«Like all former Guantánamo
detainees, Mohammed is not allowed to come to the U.S. I had imagined «
Habeas Corpus» as a work of silent witness, deriving its power from live streaming, technology, and stillness — a work of equally balanced presence and absence.»
Opening: Laurie Anderson,
Habeas Corpus at the Park Avenue Armory The late Lou Reed's better half will premiere a new installation - cum - performance piece that seamlessly blends film, sculpture, music and video on the topic of a young Guantanamo Bay
detainee — heavy stuff.
Thirty months ago, the Supreme Court held that those
detainees were entitled to seek such
habeas relief.
After all, many of the nation's top firms, where Gonzales presumably hoped for employment, are also representing Guantanamo
detainees in
habeas proceedings.
«Sixty months ago, the first of the Guantanamo
detainees arrived at Guantanamo and began filing
habeas petitions seeking release from detention.
But when it comes to the Guantanamo defendants now filing for
habeas corpus in United States courts, the tables are turned, with Department of Justice lawyers struggling against an army of elite law firms and law professors who represent the
detainees, according to the Wall Street Journal's editorial page:
Mauro at The BLT writes that the U.S. District Court in Washington, which now has
habeas jurisdiction over the
detainees as a result of today's ruling, is already responding to the decision.
As many as 200
detainees have filed
habeas petitions, and many were being held pending the outcome of Boumediene.
... But when Kennedy, after describing the facts and legal issues paused, leaned forward and started talking about basic principles, it was clear: he had provided the fifth vote to declare that Guantanamo
detainees have
habeas corpus rights that were violated when Congress stripped courts of
habeas jurisdiction in the Military Commissions Act of 2006.
A measure urging the Obama administration to ensure that any
detainees who are expected to be charged with crimes be prosecuted in federal district courts and be given all rights of
habeas corpus with full due process.
Below are some of the issues raised by Clinton's departure from the race, as well as an analysis of how yesterday's Supreme Court ruling recognizing the right of Guantanamo
detainees to avail themselves of
habeas corpus procedures is impacting the campaign message of the remaining two candidates.
In a move described as a pre-emptive strike against the
detainee bill passed by Congress last week, the Center for Consitutional Rights yesterday filed
habeas corpus petitions on behalf of 25 men being held in Afghanistan.
It aims to strip the federal courts of all ability to hear
habeas petitions by Guantanamo
detainees.
Legal Times colleague Joe Palazzolo reports that the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia which now has
habeas jurisdiction over the
detainees as a result of today's ruling, is already responding to the decision.
Court officials say as many as 200
detainees have filed
habeas petitions, and many were being held pending the Boumediene decision.
The statements taken by CSIS and DFAIT were obtained through participation in a regime which was known at the time to have refused
detainees the right to challenge the legality of detention by way of
habeas corpus.It was also known that Mr. Khadr was 16 years old at the time and that he had not had access to counsel or to any adult who had his best interests in mind.
The Supreme Court of the Unites States ruled in the 2004 decision of Rasul v. Bush that
habeas corpus rights do apply to
detainees, and that they were entitled to legal counsel.
Its Military Commissions Act 2006 exempts certain
detainees from the protection of
habeas corpus and the Geneva Conventions.