Sentences with phrase «determination on child custody»

The gulf between de novo review [the appropriate standard] and «any competent evidence» is vast — so vast that if the appellate courts applied an «any competent evidence standard» almost any family court determination on child custody, alimony, or property division would be impossible to overturn.

After separation, a court will make an initial determination on child custody.

Not exact matches

On many points, decisions of Islamic religious courts have the force of national law (a touchy issue when a dispute involves a Muslim and a non-Muslim, or when one spouse in an existing marriage converts to Islam and makes the other members of the family subject to Shari'a determinations on matters such as child custodyOn many points, decisions of Islamic religious courts have the force of national law (a touchy issue when a dispute involves a Muslim and a non-Muslim, or when one spouse in an existing marriage converts to Islam and makes the other members of the family subject to Shari'a determinations on matters such as child custodyon matters such as child custody).

In Massachusetts, child custody determinations are based on the best interests of the child.

Basics of what a court considers when grandparents seek visitation or custody of a child, a determination that is primarily based on the child's needs and best interests.

Nebraska: The court makes a custody determination based on the best interests of the child, which include the relationship of the child to each parent; (b) the desires and wishes of the child; the general health, welfare, and social behavior of the child; credible evidence of any abuse in the household.

The potential impacts of social media activity on many aspects of a divorce case, from spousal support, to determination of income for child support, to determination of custody and visitation for minor children, are too numerous to discuss here or for an attorney to address in advising their client on what they can and can not share on social media.

We will regularly update this blog, posting on a wide range of divorce and family law topics, including child custody, modifications and enforcement, and paternity determinations.»

There isn't really a significant difference in the determination of custody and parenting time between California and Nevada in that both states focus on a standard of what's in the best interest of minor children.

Section 24 of the Children's Law Reform Act states that any determination with regards to custody and access will be based on the best interests of the child.

On the basis of the fresh evidence, the Court of Appeal found that on a balance of probabilities, the three children would suffer serious harm if now ordered to return to Nigeria to await a custody and access determination in the Nigerian courtOn the basis of the fresh evidence, the Court of Appeal found that on a balance of probabilities, the three children would suffer serious harm if now ordered to return to Nigeria to await a custody and access determination in the Nigerian courton a balance of probabilities, the three children would suffer serious harm if now ordered to return to Nigeria to await a custody and access determination in the Nigerian courts.

Custody determinations often have a significant impact on the life of a child.

In an uncontested divorce, the spouses agree on everything and do not need the court to divide assets or make determinations about spousal or child support or custody.

Almost all family law courts base custody determinations on the best interests of the children.

Like all states, Alabama courts make custody and visitation determinations based on the best interests of the child.

In Idaho, «the court may award either joint physical custody or joint legal custody or shared custody based on the court's determination of the best interests of the child or children.»

Virginia custody determinations are based on what the court determines is in the child's best interest.

In making such determinations, the family courts of Hawaii do not award custody based on the parent's gender or wealth but on the best interests of the child.

Like all states, an Arizona court bases child custody determinations on what is in the best interests of the child, but a judge will consider certain factors in making a determination.

Like most states, the standard for child custody determinations in California is the overall best interest of the child with an emphasis on ensuring the health, safety, and welfare of the child and frequent and continuing contact with both parents absent child abuse, domestic violence, or where the contact would not be in the best interest of the child.

Law enforcement may place a child in protective custody based on an independent determination that the child's health, safety, and welfare is jeopardized.

adoption service (s)(in intercountry adoption) The six major services provided by adoption service providers: (1) Identifying a child for adoption and arranging an adoption; (2) Securing the necessary consent to termination of parental rights and to adoption; (3) Performing a background study on a child or a home study on a prospective adoptive parent (s), and reporting on such a study; (4) Making nonjudicial determinations of the best interests of a child and the appropriateness of an adoptive placement for the child; (5) Monitoring a case after a child has been placed with prospective adoptive parent (s) until final adoption; or (6) When necessary because of a disruption before final adoption, assuming custody and providing (including facilitating the provision of) child care or any other social service pending an alternative placement.

Under this part, a court of this state may enforce an order for the return of a child made under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction as if it were a child custody determinachild made under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction as if it were a child custody determinaChild Abduction as if it were a child custody determinachild custody determination.

(1) «Petitioner» means a person who seeks enforcement of an order for return of a child under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction or enforcement of a child custody determinachild under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction or enforcement of a child custody determinaChild Abduction or enforcement of a child custody determinachild custody determination.

Again, the court will make a custody determination based on the «best interest of the child» standard, giving consideration to the factors listed in the above section (O.R.C. 3109 (F)-RRB-.

According to the California Family Code, the standard for child custody determinations in California is the overall best interest of the child with an emphasis on assuring the «health, safety, and welfare» of the child and «frequent and continuing contact» with both parents.

Though, in determining child custody matters, a Florida judge must take into consideration the «moral fitness» of the parents (see Florida Statutes Section 61.13 (3)(f)-RRB-, the court may not make a custody determination based solely on whether a parent is gay.

In Massachusetts, child custody determinations are based on the best interests of the child.

What makes this analysis special is its direct association with the names of each judge ruling on child custody determinations in each case.

During a child custody hearing, a judge will make a determination about a parenting plan and custody based on arguments from both sides, as well as a number of other factors.

The custody determination by the court will be based on what is in the best interest of the child.

Child custody determinations are made based on the «best interests of the child» standard in all stChild custody determinations are made based on the «best interests of the child» standard in all stchild» standard in all states.

See generally Joanne Schulman & Valerie Pitt, Second Thoughts on Joint Custody: Analysis of Legislation and Its Implications For Women and Children, 12 Golden Gate U. L. Rev. 539 (1982); Joan Zorza, «Friendly Parent» Provisions in Custody Determinations, 26 Clearinghouse Rev. 921, 924 - 25 (1994)(stating that these provisions create many problems for women in custody disputes, particularly those in domestic violence situations); Family Violence in Child Custody Statutes: An Analysis of State Codes and Legal Practice, Custody: Analysis of Legislation and Its Implications For Women and Children, 12 Golden Gate U. L. Rev. 539 (1982); Joan Zorza, «Friendly Parent» Provisions in Custody Determinations, 26 Clearinghouse Rev. 921, 924 - 25 (1994)(stating that these provisions create many problems for women in custody disputes, particularly those in domestic violence situations); Family Violence in Child Custody Statutes: An Analysis of State Codes and Legal Practice, Custody Determinations, 26 Clearinghouse Rev. 921, 924 - 25 (1994)(stating that these provisions create many problems for women in custody disputes, particularly those in domestic violence situations); Family Violence in Child Custody Statutes: An Analysis of State Codes and Legal Practice, custody disputes, particularly those in domestic violence situations); Family Violence in Child Custody Statutes: An Analysis of State Codes and Legal Practice, Custody Statutes: An Analysis of State Codes and Legal Practice, 29 Fam.

(g)(1) An award of custody may be modified or terminated upon the motion of one or both parents, or on the court's own motion, upon a determination that there has been a substantial and material change in circumstances and that such modification or termination is in the best interest of the child.

When making a child custody determination, most jurisdictions make a decision based on the best interests of the child.