Sentences with phrase «determine arrangements for children»

The decisions that are needed to determine arrangements for children, finances and property at the time of separation, can only be achieved by communicating, planning, compromising and negotiating.

Not exact matches

That means there is so far no way of determining which familial arrangements might be optimal for raising children: parents working with grandparents, siblings raising children together, or some other arrangement.

When determining the joint custody arrangement that is best for the child, the court must consider:

Kansas judges deciding custody cases must determine «legal custody,» which refers to the responsibility to make educational, medical and other major decisions for a child, and «physical custody,» meaning the child's living and visitation arrangement with the parents.

In divorce cases where at least some level of arbitration is required, for instance in determining the fair division of assets or regarding child ren arrangements, couples will often proceed with their divorce in the public court system.

The Tables are designed for separated parents, who have a parenting arrangement in which one parent has the child (ren) less than 40 percent of the time, to easily determine how much they should be paying in child support to the primary parent.

Once you have worked out the important details for living and care of your children, through custody and access arrangements, you will next need to determine child support.

Be sure to work with an experienced divorce lawyer in Jacksonville to help you determine the best arrangement for you and your child.

(e) In determining the proportion of caretaking functions each parent previously performed for the child under the parenting plan before relocation, the court may not consider a division of functions arising from any arrangements made after a relocation but before a modification hearing on the issues related to relocation.

On interim custody applications, the judge will try to read both your affidavits and determine what a good arrangement for your child is.

When approaching child custody arrangements in Massachusetts, the courts will hear and assess a number of relevant facts to help determine what is truly the best solution for each child.

The first step in determining child support obligations in a shared parenting arrangement is to determine each parent's income for support purposes and determine their child support obligation in accordance with the Child Support Guidelchild support obligations in a shared parenting arrangement is to determine each parent's income for support purposes and determine their child support obligation in accordance with the Child Support Guidelchild support obligation in accordance with the Child Support GuidelChild Support Guidelines.

Particularly in a joint custody or shared residency arrangement that has been found to be in the child's best interests, the reasons for one parent to want to move, effectively ending what has already been found to be in the child's best interests, would be very relevant to determining whether the child's needs can be met in this proposed new arrangement.

-- Enabling parenting coordination by agreement or court order; — Amending the Commercial Arbitration Act to address family arbitrations; — integrating reproductive technologies into determining a child's legal parents; — Replacing the terms «custody» and «access» with «guardianship» and «parenting time»; — Defining «guardianship» through a list of «parental responsibilities» that can be allocated to allow for more customized parenting arrangements; — Extending the legislative property division regime to common - law spouses who have lived together for two years in a marriage - like relationship or who are in marriage - like relationship of some permanence and have children together; — Excluding certain types of property (e.g. pre-relationship property, gifts, and inheritances) from the pool of family property to be divided 50 - 50; and — Providing that debts are subject to equal division.

Determining what the arrangements for minor children will be before and during the divorce, as well as maintaining these relationships over time, can be a difficult and stressful process for families in Orlando.

The two primary types of legal custody, which is determined either by agreement between parents or by order of a judge, are joint legal custody, which is an arrangement where both parents share the rights to make the major decisions for their child, and sole legal custody, which is when one parent can make these decisions without input from the other parent.

The evaluation is intended to help the judge determine the custody arrangement that is best for your children.

Older children's preferences for time - sharing and living arrangements may also be a factor in crafting a parenting plan and determining time - sharing between the parents.

If you're looking for Child Arrangements Orders that determine who a child should have contact with, click Child Arrangements Orders that determine who a child should have contact with, click child should have contact with, click here.

During a divorce, California courts determine custody arrangements for the divorcing couple's children, splitting...

Before approving the parents» agreement, the court must determine whether the agreement meets the state's legal standard for a custody arrangement by protecting the children's best interests.

If a parent's living arrangements include providing a home for children from another relationship, expenses related to raising those children may reduce the parent's calculated income for the purpose of determining child support.

While the courts» primary guideline in making their custody arrangement is the best interests of the child, the courts» priority is determining which parent is capable of providing what is best for the child and the practicality of joint custody.

The trial court must determine de novo what arrangement for primary custody is in the best interest of the minor children.

Regardless of whether parents make their decisions independently or rely on therapists, custody evaluators, or judges for recommendations and decisions, statutory, historical, and cultural forces often determine which care arrangements are deemed to be in the children's best interests (Kelly, 1994).

If the court determines that shared parental responsibility would be detrimental to the child, it may order sole parental responsibility and make such arrangements for time - sharing as specified in the parenting plan as will best protect the child or abused spouse from further harm.

You can use this section to include information about the basic monthly child support amount determined for your specific custody arrangement.

... [W] e firmly believe that the lower court must make flexible application of a Melzer type formula allowing for those anomalies inherent in shared custody arrangements...» Thus, as an alternative to the offset formula method or the downward deviation method, a Melzer needs analysis might be another method for determining child support in shared custody situations.

When parents do not agree about the custodial arrangement for their children, a Mississippi court will examine the best interests of the children in determining custody.

According to Delaware Child Custody Laws, «The Court shall determine the legal custody and residential arrangements for a child in accordance with all relevant factors pertaining to the best interests of the child.&rChild Custody Laws, «The Court shall determine the legal custody and residential arrangements for a child in accordance with all relevant factors pertaining to the best interests of the child.&rchild in accordance with all relevant factors pertaining to the best interests of the child.&rchild.»

During a divorce, California courts determine custody arrangements for the divorcing couple's children, splitting both physical custody (who the child lives with) and legal custody (who makes important decisions for the child).

In order to determine if such a shared custody arrangement existed, the court stated that the critical factor in making such a determination is the division of time regarding «each party's responsibility for the custodial functions, responsibilities and duties» normally performed by the child's primary caretaker.

The key standard for determining child custody arrangements is the best interests of the child, which includes many factors.

The General Assembly, Guided by the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations, and good faith in the fulfilment of the obligations assumed by States in accordance with the Charter, Affirming that indigenous peoples are equal to all other peoples, while recognizing the right of all peoples to be different, to consider themselves different, and to be respected as such, Affirming also that all peoples contribute to the diversity and richness of civilizations and cultures, which constitute the common heritage of humankind, Affirming further that all doctrines, policies and practices based on or advocating superiority of peoples or individuals on the basis of national origin or racial, religious, ethnic or cultural differences are racist, scientifically false, legally invalid, morally condemnable and socially unjust, Reaffirming that indigenous peoples, in the exercise of their rights, should be free from discrimination of any kind, Concerned that indigenous peoples have suffered from historic injustices as a result of, inter alia, their colonization and dispossession of their lands, territories and resources, thus preventing them from exercising, in particular, their right to development in accordance with their own needs and interests, Recognizing the urgent need to respect and promote the inherent rights of indigenous peoples which derive from their political, economic and social structures and from their cultures, spiritual traditions, histories and philosophies, especially their rights to their lands, territories and resources, Recognizing also the urgent need to respect and promote the rights of indigenous peoples affirmed in treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements with States, Welcoming the fact that indigenous peoples are organizing themselves for political, economic, social and cultural enhancement and in order to bring to an end all forms of discrimination and oppression wherever they occur, Convinced that control by indigenous peoples over developments affecting them and their lands, territories and resources will enable them to maintain and strengthen their institutions, cultures and traditions, and to promote their development in accordance with their aspirations and needs, Recognizing that respect for indigenous knowledge, cultures and traditional practices contributes to sustainable and equitable development and proper management of the environment, Emphasizing the contribution of the demilitarization of the lands and territories of indigenous peoples to peace, economic and social progress and development, understanding and friendly relations among nations and peoples of the world, Recognizing in particular the right of indigenous families and communities to retain shared responsibility for the upbringing, training, education and well - being of their children, consistent with the rights of the child, Considering that the rights affirmed in treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements between States and indigenous peoples are, in some situations, matters of international concern, interest, responsibility and character, Considering also that treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements, and the relationship they represent, are the basis for a strengthened partnership between indigenous peoples and States, Acknowledging that the Charter of the United Nations, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (2) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 2 as well as the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, (3) affirm the fundamental importance of the right to self - determination of all peoples, by virtue of which they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development, Bearing in mind that nothing in this Declaration may be used to deny any peoples their right to self - determination, exercised in conformity with international law, Convinced that the recognition of the rights of indigenous peoples in this Declaration will enhance harmonious and cooperative relations between the State and indigenous peoples, based on principles of justice, democracy, respect for human rights, non-discrimination and good faith, Encouraging States to comply with and effectively implement all their obligations as they apply to indigenous peoples under international instruments, in particular those related to human rights, in consultation and cooperation with the peoples concerned,

SFI determined that equal custody arrangements are easier for small children to tolerate than for teenagers who want more control over their clothes, rooms, schedules, and proximity to friends.

In a child custody battle, a judge will ask several questions to determine which child custody arrangement, sole or joint custody, will work best for the children involved.

Further, as respecting possible modification, because of past issues of the defendant failing to comply with orders of the court; providing token compliance with orders of the court while ignoring the spirit and intent of the orders (including the orders dated December 1, 2010); the defendant's lengthy pattern of contemptuous conduct; the expenses and financial waste caused by the defendant; the substantial financial drain on the resources of the plaintiff and the guardian ad litem caused by the defendant; the pattern of parental alienation; prior false reports of abuse and / or neglect to governmental entities; and the need for repose on the part of the minor child, it is anticipated that in addition to satisfaction of the foregoing conditions, no modification motion is permitted to be filed by defendant regarding the sole physical and / or sole legal custody arrangements, except in the case of the plaintiff's total and permanent disability as determined by the Social Security Administration, unless the following conditions are satisfied...» Eisenlohr v. Eisenlohr, 2011 WL 1566201 at * 4 (Conn.Super.).

Collaborative Practice Toronto suggests advisors can help clients by: identifying, clarifying, and prioritizing financial needs and concerns (needs during or after the legal process); determining adequate budget and financial arrangements for the children's changing needs; and contrasting and comparing different settlement scenarios, and empowering spouses to make fully informed financial decisions.

Maine courts will take several factors into consideration while determining the arrangement which will be the best fit for the child.

When determining the appropriate custody arrangement for your child, the court will base its decision on what is in the best interests of your child.

All of this investigation is to determine what is best for the children, and ultimately what the custody and access arrangements are to be.

If there's any conflict about how custody should be determined, then we fall back on an analysis of a whole host of factors that include what the historical contributions to the caretaking responsibilities for the children have been, the ages of the children, and the working arrangements of the parents.