Sentences with phrase «determine fraudulent claims»

Not exact matches

Hotel Name 1 may at any time and without notice terminate or restrict a person \'s ability to submit a claim under or otherwise benefit from the Best Price Guarantee, if in its sole discretion Hotel Name 1 determines that such person has: (1) acted in a manner inconsistent with applicable laws or ordinances; (2) acted in a fraudulent or abusive manner, (3) submitted multiple invalid Best Price Guarantee claims; (4) failed to stay at Hotel Name 1 Hotels after receiving approved Best Price Guarantee Claims; or (5) breached any of these BPG claims; (4) failed to stay at Hotel Name 1 Hotels after receiving approved Best Price Guarantee Claims; or (5) breached any of these BPG Claims; or (5) breached any of these BPG Terms.

Starwood may at any time and without notice terminate or restrict a person's ability to submit a claim under or otherwise benefit from the Best Rate Guarantee, if in its sole discretion Starwood determines that such person has: (1) acted in a manner inconsistent with applicable laws or ordinances; (2) acted in a fraudulent or abusive manner, (3) submitted multiple invalid Best Rate Guarantee claims; (4) failed to stay at Starwood Hotels after receiving approved Best Rate Guarantee Claims; or (5) breached any of these BRG claims; (4) failed to stay at Starwood Hotels after receiving approved Best Rate Guarantee Claims; or (5) breached any of these BRG Claims; or (5) breached any of these BRG Terms.

MGM Resorts International may at any time and without notice terminate or restrict a person's ability to submit a claim under or otherwise benefit from the Best Rate Guarantee, if in its sole discretion MGM Resorts determines that such person has: (1) acted in a manner inconsistent with applicable laws or ordinances; (2) acted in a fraudulent or abusive manner; (3) submitted multiple invalid Best Rate Guarantee claims; (4) failed to stay at an MGM Resorts destination after receiving approved Best Rate Guarantee claims; or (5) breached any of these Best Rate Guarantee terms.

The motion judge refused to stay Haas's action, determining that the «pith and substance» of most of the claims advanced by Haas related to the fraudulent misrepresentation of facts that caused Haas to enter into the shareholders» agreement, and were not contractual claims.

A Michigan district court judge determined that the Clean Air Act did not preclude plaintiffs from bringing 53 state law fraudulent concealment and consumer protection claims against General Motors LLC and its suppliers for developing and installing devices on GM diesel trucks to cheat emissions tests.

Bank statements are relevant to determining whether an insured has a motive for making a fraudulent claim.