Modify cartel laws so they apply conduct affecting goods or services supplied or acquired in Australian markets and are confined to conduct involving firms who are actual or likely competitors (
determined on balance of probabilities)
The impossibility referred to in case law does not describe scientific impossibility, but rather the impossibility to
determine on a balance of probabilities which specific tortfeasor was at fault.
Not exact matches
Avoidable damages are to be
determined by assuming that the plaintiff has agreed to an operation not yet performed rather than looking at what
on the
balance of probabilities would have happened had the operation taken place.
If the court
determines that a provision is ambiguous, then the parties can present extrinsic evidence to support their interpretation and the court decides based
on the
balance of probability, sometimes deciding ambiguity against the drafter or party with the stronger negotiating position as a rule.
Before a hearing can be held to
determine if the test has been satisfied, the accused must show
on a
balance of probabilities that the evidence he is proposing to admit is capable
of meeting the test.
The trial judge was therefore required to presume the advance was not a gift and to
determine whether the respondent had satisfied the burden
of rebutting the presumption
of resulting trust
on a
balance of probabilities (para. 44).
The presumption
of resulting trust
determines the result only where there is insufficient evidence to rebut the presumption
on the
balance of probabilities — Pecore at paras 20, 222 - 225.
On appeal, the Court applied the principles set out by the Supreme Court of Canada in Fairmont Hotels and determined that in order to obtain rectification of an instrument, the party seeking rectification must establish on a balance of probabilities tha
On appeal, the Court applied the principles set out by the Supreme Court
of Canada in Fairmont Hotels and
determined that in order to obtain rectification
of an instrument, the party seeking rectification must establish
on a balance of probabilities tha
on a
balance of probabilities that:
The court must
determine: (i) whether the evidence establishes the employee's deceitful (dishonest) conduct
on a
balance of probabilities; and (ii) if so, whether the nature and degree
of the dishonesty warrant the employee's dismissal.
In accordance with this test, a trial judge must instruct the jury to
determine: (1) whether the evidence established the employee's deceitful conduct
on a
balance of probabilities; and (2) if so, whether the nature and degree
of the dishonesty warranted dismissal.
The Court
of Appeal
determined that the appellants» case foundered at the first logical question in the causal reasoning process: have the plaintiffs proven,
on a
balance of probabilities, that a delay in treatment led to the plaintiff's injuries, considering only what he needed by way
of timely diagnosis and treatment in order to avoid the injuries?