Not exact matches
It's the evaluation system, as well as processes used for
determining student placement and
promotion, that lawmakers are targeting.
As states across the U.S. move to adopt standardized tests as a means to
determine grade
promotion and school graduation, new research presented in the Harvard Educational Review shows that sole reliance on high - stakes tests as a graduation requirement may increase inequities among
students by both race and gender.
Amrein and Berliner identified 28 states where test scores are used to
determine various consequences, such as bonuses for teachers, the
promotion of
students, or allowing children to transfer out of a failing school.
This bill would prevent educators from using PARCC scores, «to
determine a
student's placement in a gifted and talented program, another program or intervention, grade
promotion, as the State graduation proficiency test, any other school or district - level decision that affects
students, or as part of any evaluation rubric submitted to the Commissioner of Education for approval.»
Accountability must have three components — diagnostics to assist educators in
determining the intervention needs of
students; transparency for parents and taxpayers; and consequences, for educators in terms of compensation and continuing employment and for
students in terms of
promotion and graduation.
In keeping with Jindal's months - long offensive, the Jindal administration decried the move, noting that teachers will leave the classroom the week before
students take standardized tests that
determine, in part,
student promotions and graduations, school accountability assessments and teacher evaluations for tenure.
Targeting
students aged 18 and older, the
promotion requires entrants to read a short article about credit,
determine their Credit GPA by taking a 5 - question quiz, and complete an online entry form for a chance to win $ 500 towards tuition and book expenses.