But many of these laws are
determined by the individual states.
The answer depends mostly on where the voter is registered, because American election laws and procedures are for the most part
determined by the individual states, even in elections for federal office.
The exact names, dates, term lengths, term limits, electoral systems, electoral districts, and other details are
determined by the individual states» laws.
Teacher pension formulas usually include the following variables: years of service, final average salary, and a benefit multiplier
determined by individual states and plans.
While more money sounds like it will produce a greater windfall for Australian schools, the priority in which they receive these funds is still
determined by the individual states and territories, not by the Commonwealth, thereby producing markedly varied results across the country.
The laws of commingling of inheritances are
determined by each individual state, and this post can not promise a specific result when it comes to determining how property will be divided during a divorce.
The coverage limits are
determined by each individual state and normally split into two categories.
Ultimately the regulation of auto insurance companies and rates is
determined by each individual state.
Auto insurance is a state level issue and the laws and regulations surrounding this policy type are
determined by the individual states.
Not exact matches
If the business is a corporation, «at least 51 percent of each class of voting stock and 51 percent of the aggregate of all outstanding shares of stock must be unconditionally owned
by an
individual (s)
determined by SBA to be socially and economically disadvantaged,»
stated the Small Business Administration.
The quirk in election law emerged from a 1996
state Board of Elections ruling that
determined that each limited liability company controlled
by a developer should be treated as if it were an
individual under election law.
We are also
determined to go even further in protecting the
individual from the clutches of an over-mighty
state,
by taking the details of innocent people off the DNA database and amending the laws that allow councils to snoop on people.
As Washington wrestles with what to do about DACA, Gov. Andrew Cuomo announced today that he has signed an executive order prohibiting
state agencies and officers from inquiring about or disclosing an
individual's immigration status unless required
by law or necessary to
determine eligibility for a benefit or service.
Governor Andrew M. Cuomo today (Friday) issued Executive Order 170 that prohibits
state agencies and officers from inquiring about or disclosing an
individual's immigration status unless required
by law or necessary to
determine eligibility for a benefit or service.
In the Nature study you
state that previous work has not
determined the impact of acidification on the ability of
individual species to calcify because they measured net calcification (that is, gross calcification minus dissolution) thus failing to disentangle the relative contributions of gross calcification (the amount of carbonate deposited
by an animal over time) and dissolution rates.
Tennessee:
Individual student - projection data will
determine the proportion of students,
by subgroup and subject area, who are projected to attain proficiency on the
state assessment three years into the future.
Smarter Balanced was created
by assessment professionals in
state education agencies who
determined that
by pooling their experience and expertise — and
by taking advantage of the federal funds offered
by the Department of Education and working in partnership with private sector firms — they could build more sophisticated and accurate assessments of student learning than any
individual state could offer on its own.
«In response to an October 2013 complaint filed
by the Center for Children's Advocacy against the district, the
state conducted an investigation and
determined that the district violated its obligations to students under the
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and
state law.
(3) The Secretary may make a grant for a project pursuant to this subsection only on his determination that (A) the purpose of such project is to prepare handicapped
individuals, especially those with the most severe handicaps, for gainful and suitable employment: (B) the
individuals to receive training services under such project will include only those who have been
determined to be suitable for and in need of such training services
by the
State agency or agencies designated as provided in section 101 (a)(1) of the *
State in which the REHABILITATION facility is located; (C) the full range of training services will be made available to each such
individual, to the extent of his need for such services; and (D) the project, including the * participating REHABILITATION facility and the training services provided, meet such other requirements as he may prescribe in regulations for carrying out the purposes of this subsection.
(a) Insert «1» after (a)» in subsection (a) and add at the end of subsection (a) the following new paragraphs: (2) No person acting under color of law shall --(A) in
determining whether any
individual is qualified under
State law or laws to vote in any Federal election, apply any standard, practice, or procedure different from the standards, practices, or procedures applied under such law or laws to other
individuals within the same county, parish, or similar political subdivision who have been found
by State officials to be qualified to vote;
An
individual (under the age of 18) who has legally been
determined to be an adult
by a court in his or her
state of legal residence.
-- Water Test — If the property is serviced
by an
individual well; the lender may require a water analysis to
determine whether or not it meets
state standards for potability (safe to drink).
individual who is eligible to inherit the assets of someone who died without a will;
determined by state intestacy laws of the
state of the deceased's primary residence
For more information,
individuals can visit the VA Home Loan Centers
state -
by -
state information, and they can also contact a representative from the company, to
determine eligibility, loan limits, appraisal fees and funding fees.
Your life insurance pricing may be different and is
determined by your
individual risk factors and the
state where you have your primary residence.
I can't understand why more Americans are not bothered that a trade organization (the CVMA) is interfering both with
state HOUSING laws and with the rights of
individual cities in California to
determine what is and is not consistent with their civic values (as evidenced
by the CVMA's attempt to overturn the declaw ban in West Hollywood).
Schmidt dug in on the difference between the «is» of science — the facts and probabilities — and the «ought»
determined by individual feelings about the
state of the world and how to shape it.
There's a troubling section, however, in which Mann creates a flawed dichotomy, hailing a paper
by James Hansen and Jeffrey Sachs of Columbia University (and others) pressing for deep carbon cuts and criticizing a peer, * Ken Caldeira of the Carnegie Institution, for complaining that the paper failed the Stephen Schneider / Gavin Schmidt test for distinguishing between the «is» of science and the «ought»
determined by individual feelings about the
state of the world and how to shape it.
Whether or not an
individual tree will survive a beetle attack is
determined by its pre-attack nutritional and hydration
states, and the number and timing of beetles that attack it.
What Article 28 (3) with its omission of public policy grounds seems to suggest in my view is that — to a certain extent — the mere fact of a 10 years residence has created a link between the EU citizen and the host Member
State that is similar to the link between a national and its state; as a consequence expulsion can only be a valid means if this link is deliberately destroyed by the EU citizen; this would be the case of a serious security threat, i.e. an individual determined to engage in actions that jeopardize the security of the host Member State's society at large, which could indeed be the case of organized c
State that is similar to the link between a national and its
state; as a consequence expulsion can only be a valid means if this link is deliberately destroyed by the EU citizen; this would be the case of a serious security threat, i.e. an individual determined to engage in actions that jeopardize the security of the host Member State's society at large, which could indeed be the case of organized c
state; as a consequence expulsion can only be a valid means if this link is deliberately destroyed
by the EU citizen; this would be the case of a serious security threat, i.e. an
individual determined to engage in actions that jeopardize the security of the host Member
State's society at large, which could indeed be the case of organized c
State's society at large, which could indeed be the case of organized crime.
This picture has been complicated somewhat
by the decision of the ECJ in Rottmann that when Member
States determine the conditions for the revocation of this status from specific
individuals then they act within the scope of EU law and thus their executive action must fulfil the conditions of the principle of proportionality.
Mr. Sirota is also of the view that in
determining whether
state action has «deprived» an
individual of life, liberty or security of the person, the Court should not be limited
by what I refer to as the «direct effects» of the law.
The Trademark Insider Awards — a set of annual awards designed to formally recognize leading trademark firms and
individual attorneys in the United
States — are
determined by calculating the number...
The Ninth Circuit and the United
States Supreme Court began their legal analysis
by addressing the issue of whether an
individual has a due process liberty interest in
determining the time and manner of death.
It is a critical case in
determining the scope of the police's duties under ECHR, art 3 in relation to acts committed
by a private
individual without the involvement or complicity of the
state.
Help fix the magnet
state court problem
by requiring courts to
determine jurisdiction on an
individual case basis in a MDL.
Response: Once a minor becomes emancipated or attains the age of majority, as
determined by applicable
state law, the parent is no longer the personal representative under § 164.502 (g)(3) of such
individual, unless the parent has the authority to act on behalf of the
individual for some reason other than their authority as a parent.
While the particulars of
individual cruise line contracts» fine print on the matter vary, most lines we contacted
stated that such policies are typically
determined on a case -
by - case basis.
If that's the case, your open enrollment period is
determined by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, under regulations pertaining to the Affordable Care Act (prior to 2014, there was no such thing as open enrollment for
individual health insurance, but insurers in most
states could reject applications from people with pre-existing conditions, or charge them higher premiums; coverage is now guaranteed issue, regardless of medical history, but enrollment is limited to open enrollment or special enrollment periods).
Your life insurance pricing may be different and is
determined by your
individual risk factors and the
state where you have your primary residence.
In the United
States, individual states determine how claims are handled by designating themselves «fault» or «no fault» s
States,
individual states determine how claims are handled by designating themselves «fault» or «no fault» s
states determine how claims are handled
by designating themselves «fault» or «no fault»
statesstates.
This defensive driving workshop is designed for
individuals who have been found to be driving aggressively and ordered to attend
by the court, those who have received several traffic violations in a short period of time, those who have been
determined to be a habitual traffic offender, or those who have a ticket from another
state with a greater course time requirement greater than four hours.
Refunds of
state and local court fees are
determined by their
individual refund policies.
Each
state has individual requirements for certification, so please consult your State Board of Pharmacy to determine which certification provider (s) is / are accepted by your s
state has
individual requirements for certification, so please consult your
State Board of Pharmacy to determine which certification provider (s) is / are accepted by your s
State Board of Pharmacy to
determine which certification provider (s) is / are accepted
by your
statestate.
An
individual must obtain the necessary credentials,
determined by the
state, to be employed as a MA.
An
individual may apply for reciprocity review if the
individual is currently licensed in another
state whose licensing requirements are greater than or equal to the requirements in this rule as
determined by the Board.
This boundary is often
determined by the availability of other funding mechanisms, including local and
state maternal and child health funds,
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act funding, and other early childhood programs.
States have statutory lists of factors that courts consider to
determine what is in the best interests of the child, but it's up to an
individual judge to interpret them on a case -
by - case basis.
However, your
state's laws may allow you to trace the money in your
individual bank account to
determine whether it is marital or separate property and
by how much.
The General Assembly, Guided
by the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations, and good faith in the fulfilment of the obligations assumed
by States in accordance with the Charter, Affirming that indigenous peoples are equal to all other peoples, while recognizing the right of all peoples to be different, to consider themselves different, and to be respected as such, Affirming also that all peoples contribute to the diversity and richness of civilizations and cultures, which constitute the common heritage of humankind, Affirming further that all doctrines, policies and practices based on or advocating superiority of peoples or
individuals on the basis of national origin or racial, religious, ethnic or cultural differences are racist, scientifically false, legally invalid, morally condemnable and socially unjust, Reaffirming that indigenous peoples, in the exercise of their rights, should be free from discrimination of any kind, Concerned that indigenous peoples have suffered from historic injustices as a result of, inter alia, their colonization and dispossession of their lands, territories and resources, thus preventing them from exercising, in particular, their right to development in accordance with their own needs and interests, Recognizing the urgent need to respect and promote the inherent rights of indigenous peoples which derive from their political, economic and social structures and from their cultures, spiritual traditions, histories and philosophies, especially their rights to their lands, territories and resources, Recognizing also the urgent need to respect and promote the rights of indigenous peoples affirmed in treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements with
States, Welcoming the fact that indigenous peoples are organizing themselves for political, economic, social and cultural enhancement and in order to bring to an end all forms of discrimination and oppression wherever they occur, Convinced that control
by indigenous peoples over developments affecting them and their lands, territories and resources will enable them to maintain and strengthen their institutions, cultures and traditions, and to promote their development in accordance with their aspirations and needs, Recognizing that respect for indigenous knowledge, cultures and traditional practices contributes to sustainable and equitable development and proper management of the environment, Emphasizing the contribution of the demilitarization of the lands and territories of indigenous peoples to peace, economic and social progress and development, understanding and friendly relations among nations and peoples of the world, Recognizing in particular the right of indigenous families and communities to retain shared responsibility for the upbringing, training, education and well - being of their children, consistent with the rights of the child, Considering that the rights affirmed in treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements between
States and indigenous peoples are, in some situations, matters of international concern, interest, responsibility and character, Considering also that treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements, and the relationship they represent, are the basis for a strengthened partnership between indigenous peoples and
States, Acknowledging that the Charter of the United Nations, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (2) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 2 as well as the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, (3) affirm the fundamental importance of the right to self - determination of all peoples,
by virtue of which they freely
determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development, Bearing in mind that nothing in this Declaration may be used to deny any peoples their right to self - determination, exercised in conformity with international law, Convinced that the recognition of the rights of indigenous peoples in this Declaration will enhance harmonious and cooperative relations between the
State and indigenous peoples, based on principles of justice, democracy, respect for human rights, non-discrimination and good faith, Encouraging
States to comply with and effectively implement all their obligations as they apply to indigenous peoples under international instruments, in particular those related to human rights, in consultation and cooperation with the peoples concerned,