So you've
determined glacier melt has been accelerating by comparing the 3 - year 2001 - 2004 «trend» to the 4 - year 2001 - 2005 «trend».
Not exact matches
The Pine Island
Glacier expedition deployed multiple, unique sensor packages, developed by NPS Research Professor Tim Stanton, through 500 meters of solid ice to
determine exactly how quickly warm water was
melting the massive
glacier from beneath.
Using satellites, the researchers
determined that «bottom
melt rates experienced by large outlet
glaciers near their grounding lines are far higher than generally assumed.»
Re GRACE
glacier measurements, David H. Bromwich & Julien P. Nicolas report a major reduction in uncertainty of
glacier melting — they can now identify that the TREND is negative, but not yet
determine the magnitude!
The
melt rate is
determined from repeat probing and stakes drilled into the
glacier recording the actual surface
melt.
Annual net balance on eight North Cascades
glaciers during the 1984 - 1994 period has been
determined by measurement, of total mass loss from firn and ice
melt and, of residual snow depth at the end of the summer season.
Now he's embarking on a joint project with the eminent climatologist V. Ramanathan of the Scripps Institute of Oceanography and Eric Wilcox, an atmospheric scientist at NASA, to
determine exactly how quickly some benchmark
glaciers in the Indian Himalayas are
melting.
Finally, climate scientist Eric Steig and his research team have
determined that the natural conditions and phases of tropical Pacific waters are the real cause of Antarctica's coastal
glaciers»
melting.
Thus the topography of the coastal shelves and depth of submerged
glacier grounding points
determines the impact of upwelled CDW and limits extreme basal
melting to a relatively few locations as illustrated by the red and orange areas in the figure below (from Depoorter 2013)..
While
glaciers melt under the pressure of greenhouse gas emissions, Kearney is
determined to reduce her part in climate change by offsetting all Olympic training travel with NativeEnergy.
So in fact three variables
determine how the meltwater at the bed organizes itself: the
melting rate at void walls, the opening rate due to down -
glacier flow, and the closure rate due to the pressure difference at void walls, the latter depending in turn on the rate of delivery of surface meltwater.
re: «A complementary method for
determining and / or evaluating global sea level rise is a budget analysis that adds together the cumulative effect of the main contributors to sea level rise: thermal expansion,
melting of ice in
glaciers, ice loss from the Greenland and the Antarctic ice sheets, and changes in land water storage.»
A complementary method for
determining and / or evaluating global sea level rise is a budget analysis that adds together the cumulative effect of the main contributors to sea level rise: thermal expansion,
melting of ice in
glaciers, ice loss from the Greenland and the Antarctic ice sheets, and changes in land water storage.
They
determined, however, that this volume had now increased by a further 3 cubic miles each year, prompted by an acceleration in the rate at which the ice caps and
glaciers are
melting.Unlike what many other scientists have said — including, most prominently, NASA's James Hansen (who believes that a rise in 17 inches by 2100 will be mainly precipitated by the
melting of ice sheets)-- the authors of this study believe that the loss of ice from
glaciers and ice caps will account for the majority of the expected rise in sea levels.
The scientists used satellite monitoring to
determine the contribution of all land - based ice (except for Greenland and Antarctica's huge ice sheets) to rising sea levels and found that the volume of ice
melting into the sea each year from ice caps and
glaciers was 100 cubic miles (or 417 cubic km).