(5) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502 Basis for
determining Federal awards expended, paragraph (b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period.
Not exact matches
When shares of Capital Stock are to be issued upon the exercise, grant or vesting of an Incentive
Award, Google shall have the authority to withhold a number of such shares having a Fair Market Value at the date of the applicable taxable event
determined by the Committee to be sufficient to satisfy the minimum
federal, state and local withholding tax requirements, if any, attributable to such exercise, grant or vesting but not greater than the minimum withholding obligations, as
determined by Google in its sole discretion.
The speculation surrounding Governor David Paterson's
award of the Aqueduct Raceway contract to Aqueduct Entertainment Group, a politically connected conglomerate, is mounting, as news has emerged on WPIX that
federal investigators are launching a formal investigation to
determine whether there was any wrongdoing during the selection process.
The Secretary announces the annual updates to the tables used in the statutory
Federal Need Analysis Methodology that
determines a student's expected family contribution (EFC) for
award year (AY) 2019 - 20 for student financial aid programs, Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Numbers 84.063, 84.033, 84.007, 84.268, 84.408, and 84.379.
Nearly all colleges and universities rely on the FAFSA to
determine financial aid
awards, and the Department of Education through the Office of
Federal Student Aid is responsible for processing new applications each year.
Moreover, while costs
awards are intended to make a successful litigant whole, costs in the
Federal Court are
determined in accordance with the
Federal Courts Rules, which prescribe fixed dollar amounts for various steps in the litigation process regardless of the actual costs incurred: Litigants can only expect to recover approximately 25 per cent of their actual legal costs in complex cases.
Meantime, Bartlett, maintains that the jury
award was
determined under state law and has no
federal law conflict.
The Court of Appeals correctly identified the constitutional standard for
determining whether § 36 - 820, as construed by the Tennessee courts to authorize an
award of a veteran's disability benefits as child support, conflicts with
federal law, and is therefore preempted under the Supremacy Clause.
The
federal rules allow a court to impose sanctions if it
determines an appeal is frivolous, allowing it to
award «just damages» or double costs to the appellee.
Federal appellate court reverses its earlier decision and
determines that arbitrator's failure to disclose his minimal contact with prevailing party's attorney did not require vacating an arbitration
award.