Sentences with phrase «determining child custody arrangements»

Family courts in New Jersey consider several factors when determining child custody arrangements.

The key standard for determining child custody arrangements is the best interests of the child, which includes many factors.

The first step in determining child custody arrangements is whether the parents can come to an agreement.

Family courts in New Jersey consider several factors when determining child custody arrangements.

In most states, family courts determine child custody arrangements based on what is in the best interests of the child.

The best interests of the child are taken into consideration to determine the child custody arrangement.

In your divorce, the court has authority to divide your marital property, determine child custody arrangements and order payments of child support and spousal support.

As in many other states, the primary concern in determining a child custody arrangement is resolving what is in the best interests of the child.

Not exact matches

Family courts in New Jersey can order a custody arrangement agreed upon by both parents unless it is determined that the requested custody arrangement does not serve the child's best interests.

This means that the judge will determine the custody arrangement that best suits the child's needs, based on a variety of factors.

Although, it's a great idea to develop a parenting plan to determine where the child is expected to reside on certain days in a joint custody arrangement, it's equally important to be flexible.

South Dakota uses several criteria to determine child custody, a list of factors determined to help identify what type of custody arrangement is in the child's best interests.

When determining the joint custody arrangement that is best for the child, the court must consider:

The judge will ask a parent several questions during a child custody hearing to determine which custody arrangement serves the child's best interest.

One of the first steps in determining who will get custody of a child is to understand your options regarding different types of potential custody arrangements.

When determining child support obligations, courts handle joint custody arrangements differently.

Quite often, the court will enlist the assistance of a child custody evaluator to determine what custody arrangements are in the best interest of the child (ren).

Kansas judges deciding custody cases must determine «legal custody,» which refers to the responsibility to make educational, medical and other major decisions for a child, and «physical custody,» meaning the child's living and visitation arrangement with the parents.

To decide custody and parenting time in your case, the judge's task is to determine what arrangement is in the best interest of your children.

Once you have worked out the important details for living and care of your children, through custody and access arrangements, you will next need to determine child support.

On interim custody applications, the judge will try to read both your affidavits and determine what a good arrangement for your child is.

These issues might include determining post-divorce benefits, calculating spousal and child support, and making child custody arrangements.

The purpose of a child custody arrangement is to determine which rights each parent will have with respect to their children.

When approaching child custody arrangements in Massachusetts, the courts will hear and assess a number of relevant facts to help determine what is truly the best solution for each child.

He or she will seek information that will be helpful in determining what custody / access arrangements are in the best interests of the children.

Particularly in a joint custody or shared residency arrangement that has been found to be in the child's best interests, the reasons for one parent to want to move, effectively ending what has already been found to be in the child's best interests, would be very relevant to determining whether the child's needs can be met in this proposed new arrangement.

-- Enabling parenting coordination by agreement or court order; — Amending the Commercial Arbitration Act to address family arbitrations; — integrating reproductive technologies into determining a child's legal parents; — Replacing the terms «custody» and «access» with «guardianship» and «parenting time»; — Defining «guardianship» through a list of «parental responsibilities» that can be allocated to allow for more customized parenting arrangements; — Extending the legislative property division regime to common - law spouses who have lived together for two years in a marriage - like relationship or who are in marriage - like relationship of some permanence and have children together; — Excluding certain types of property (e.g. pre-relationship property, gifts, and inheritances) from the pool of family property to be divided 50 - 50; and — Providing that debts are subject to equal division.

In Session 9, Bill Eddy explains various types of custody and parenting time arrangements that are in the best interests of the children, and helps you determine whether to request supervised visits or not.

Session 9 - Types of Custody & Access (Visitation / Parenting Time) Arrangements, and Requesting Supervised Visits This session explain various types of custody and parenting time arrangements that are in the best interests of the children, and helps you determine whether to request supervised visits Custody & Access (Visitation / Parenting Time) Arrangements, and Requesting Supervised Visits This session explain various types of custody and parenting time arrangements that are in the best interests of the children, and helps you determine whether to request supervised viArrangements, and Requesting Supervised Visits This session explain various types of custody and parenting time arrangements that are in the best interests of the children, and helps you determine whether to request supervised visits custody and parenting time arrangements that are in the best interests of the children, and helps you determine whether to request supervised viarrangements that are in the best interests of the children, and helps you determine whether to request supervised visits or not.

After issuing a report of the sessions, the court may use the counselor's custody recommendation in determining what arrangement furthers the child's best interests.

The two primary types of legal custody, which is determined either by agreement between parents or by order of a judge, are joint legal custody, which is an arrangement where both parents share the rights to make the major decisions for their child, and sole legal custody, which is when one parent can make these decisions without input from the other parent.

The evaluation is intended to help the judge determine the custody arrangement that is best for your children.

During a divorce, California courts determine custody arrangements for the divorcing couple's children, splitting...

Rhode Island, like all other states, uses the «best interests of the child» standard to determine custody arrangements, and neither parent is the presumed custodian.

When determining the custody arrangement, like all state courts, Massachusetts courts are primarily concerned with the best interests of the child.

In child custody disputes, the court may also need to employ a third - party custody evaluator to determine what arrangement is in the child's best interest.

The judge will determine if there has been a significant change in circumstances and, if so, determine a new custody arrangement according to the best interests of the child.

Your specific custody arrangement and your and your spouse's income will determine the amount of temporary child support owed.

Before approving the parents» agreement, the court must determine whether the agreement meets the state's legal standard for a custody arrangement by protecting the children's best interests.

Ohio courts consider the best interests of the child — not the parents — when determining custody arrangements.

While the courts» primary guideline in making their custody arrangement is the best interests of the child, the courts» priority is determining which parent is capable of providing what is best for the child and the practicality of joint custody.

The trial court must determine de novo what arrangement for primary custody is in the best interest of the minor children.

Regardless of whether parents make their decisions independently or rely on therapists, custody evaluators, or judges for recommendations and decisions, statutory, historical, and cultural forces often determine which care arrangements are deemed to be in the children's best interests (Kelly, 1994).

You can use this section to include information about the basic monthly child support amount determined for your specific custody arrangement.

Courts can also use other factors to determine what custody arrangement is in the child's best interests.

Once child custody arrangements are determined, the parent who does not live with the child, and who usually only has visiting rights without sharing custody, is the absent parent.

In Utah, the wishes of a child are one factor a court may consider when determining the custody arrangement following a...

... [W] e firmly believe that the lower court must make flexible application of a Melzer type formula allowing for those anomalies inherent in shared custody arrangements...» Thus, as an alternative to the offset formula method or the downward deviation method, a Melzer needs analysis might be another method for determining child support in shared custody situations.

When parents do not agree about the custodial arrangement for their children, a Mississippi court will examine the best interests of the children in determining custody.

To assist the Court in determining what custody arrangement is in the best interest of the minor child (ren), the Court will often order the parties and the minor child (ren) to be evaluated by a Court social worker.