But I can think of no context — and Griffin offers us no examples of contexts — in which FWTs don't apply exactly the same criteria for
determining justified belief to the positions of their opponents as they apply to their own.
Not exact matches
I can not
determine anything that is first person, and you very well may have good
justified reasons for your
belief, and all I can say is that I don't have evidence to
justify accepting the claim.
The general Christian
belief is that God snuffed out most people in the so - called Great Flood and any pregnant women's unborn children would have already been
determined as sinners by God and therefore
justified in His eyes, right?
It is certainly true — as I will soon point out — that many FWTs do utilize a set of criteria different from Griffin's when
determining justified theistic
belief.