Our background in this area includes
determining legal structures of joint ventures and related tax planning, developing business and operating plans and drafting and negotiating documents that protect intellectual property rights, provide appropriate governance controls and establish workable deadlock resolution and exit strategies.
Determining the legal structure of your business is also an important step in starting a publishing business.
The next step will be to
determine the legal structure of your business before you begin operations.
Not exact matches
Determine the best
legal structure for the business, such as partnership, limited liability corporation or a sole proprietorship.
In the current
legal environment, social entrepreneurs need to work with
legal counsel, their boards and advisors to
determine which
legal structure works best for their situation.
Now, they're rounded up for the ultimate listicle on how entrepreneurs can distinguish between the
structures in order to
determine which
legal entity is the best fit for their business.
But in our American
legal structure, we are not under a king with divine rights, we are the government and as such, we are legally individually entitled to protect our rights which are divinely given, not
determined by any government.
What the Supreme Court says in Zelman could have a marked effect in
structuring the terms of the political debate - not just in
determining who wins the
legal argument, but in explaining its broader implications in a way that only the Supreme Court can.
Where lawyers who do not want their jobs to depend upon on billing a high number of hours would not need to bill a high number of hours: Under a corporate
structure, there would be no «leveraged pyramid» for partner compensation, fixed prices would be
determined by professionals skilled in the pricing of
legal services, and the lawyers» jobs would depend upon their productivity.
These benefits include a
structured procedure to
determine legal rights; access to and the application of established precedents, a rich and sometimes codified body of principles to
determine what evidence... [more]
Once you've
determined the appropriate
legal structure, you can use our convenient online incorporation service to get started.
Business Incorporation: If forming an RIA, name and register your entity after
determining the right
legal structure.
All of this means that law firms that want to gain competitive advantage must look at the changes happening around them now, calculate what those changes will do to the delivery of
legal services, what services consumers will require and who the competitors will be 5 — 10 years down the road; then
determine what the winning combination of
structure, talent and management will look like.
The framework ties together the major components of the regulation of
legal services in a
structured way, showing the interrelationships of the Society's legislative mandate (LPA), regulatory objectives, elements and outcomes in
determining how the Society operates.
«We spend a significant amount of time
determining what that bonus
structure looks like — not so much the quantum, but the
structure --- and then to ensure that it actually ties not only to the objectives of the corporation, but also that of the law division,» says Brian Hilbers, Bruce Power's chief
legal counsel and vice president, emergency management.
By splitting complex
legal sentences into smaller segments, Hung et al. were able to more better
determine the correct syntactic
structure and reduce ambiguity.
Once you've
determined the appropriate
legal structure, you can simply use our convenient online incorporation service, customizable by state, to file your paperwork.
That's changed; clients — not law firms — now
determine the value of matters, when lawyers (and law firms) are required, from what
structure (in - house, law firm, or service provider)
legal services are provided, and at what price point.
Chuck Chandler, partner and chairman of the
legal consulting practice for Valeo Partners in Washington, D.C., helps clients
determine optimal pricing
structure for law firms and corporate counsels.
The Cost of Justice Survey was
structured to
determine the number of respondents who had experienced 84 specific
legal problems.
Legal services provided by us include
determining the appropriate business entity, jurisdiction and taxation status,
structuring and formation of new entities, foreign investments, foreign collaborations, joint ventures, and technology absorption, setting up of branch offices, liaison offices or project offices, tax planning, developing and documenting shareholder agreements, creating executive employment agreements that attract and retain key leadership, identifying and securing intellectual property via trademarks, patents and copyright protection, creating business financing strategies, advising clients for ongoing business needs and transactions, distributorships, sales agreements, stockholders» buy - sell agreements, franchise agreements, intellectual property and license agreements, outsourcing agreements, licensing agreements and technology transfers, including hardware, software and other services and products, trade practices, advertising and promotions.
These benefits include a
structured procedure to
determine legal rights; access to and the application of established precedents, a rich and sometimes codified body of principles to
determine what evidence is available to the decision maker and the right to have detailed written reasons provided when
legal rights are
determined.
Consumers — not lawyers —
determine what is «
legal,» whose expertise is required, when it is needed, from what
structure / business model it is delivered, and at what price point it is valued.
For example, LSUC ignores the problem and its duties as set out in s. 4.2 of the (Ontario) Law Society Act, while «fast - tracking» the Alternative Business
Structures issue (ABS issue) to the quick creation of: (1) an ABS Committee (2) a (biased) ABS Discussion Paper written by the Committee; (3) the online publication of the responses thus obtained; (4) the online publication of a summary of those responses — all done by the work of those self - interested benchers who have campaigned hard to have ABSs made
legal; and (5) a proposed vote in 2016 to
determine the law society's position as to making ABSs
legal.
Prof. Conduct 123 (2001)(subject to the operational
structure and content described in the opinion, a lawyer may affiliate with an online
legal services website); Nebraska Op. 07 - 05 (lawyer may participate in internet lawyer directory which identifies itself as a directory, disclaims being a referral service and only lists basic information about lawyers without recommending specific lawyers and charges a reasonable, flat annual advertising fee); New Jersey Committee on Attorney Advertising Op. 36 (2006)(lawyer may pay flat fee to internet marketing company for exclusive website listing for particular county in specific practice area if listing includes prominent, unmistakable disclaimer stating the listings are paid advertisements and not endorsements or authorized referrals); North Carolina Op. 2004 - 1 (lawyer may participate in for - profit online service that is a hybrid referral service -
legal directory, provided there is no fee - sharing with the service and communications are truthful); Oregon Op. 2007 - 180 (2007)(lawyer may pay nationwide internet referral service for listing if listing is not false or misleading and does not imply that the lawyer can represent clients outside jurisdictions of the lawyer's license, fee is not based on number of referrals, retained clients or revenue generated by listing and the service does not exercise discretion in matching clients with lawyers); Rhode Island 2005 - 01 (permitting website that enables lawyers to post information about their services and respond to anonymous requests for
legal services in exchange for flat annual membership fee if website exercises no discretion over which requests lawyers may access); South Carolina 01 - 03 (lawyer may pay internet advertising service fee
determined by the number of «hits» that the service produces for the lawyer provided that the service does not steer business to any particular lawyer and the payments are not based on whether user ultimately becomes a client); Texas Op. 573 (2006)(lawyer may participate in for - profit internet service that matches potential clients and lawyers if selection process is fully automated and performed by computers without the exercise of human discretion); Virginia Advertising Op.
When a judge
determines that a defendant has established an LLC for
legal protection and not for use in commerce, that judge may disregard the
legal structure of the LLC and look through to its owners.