Sentences with phrase «develop dangerous changes»

Many pets in uremic failure (failing kidneys) develop dangerous changes in their blood calcium and phosphorus levels.

Not exact matches

That is well short of the 25 to 40 per cent cuts that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says are required from developed nations to avoid the most dangerous consequences of climate cChange says are required from developed nations to avoid the most dangerous consequences of climate changechange.

The findings, published Sept. 20 in the Journal of Virology published by the American Society for Microbiology, were publicly revealed almost simultaneously with those from China - based scientists who found a change of a single amino acid made the virus more dangerous to developing brain cells.

What's more, studies have found that the components found in garlic can put a stop to potentially dangerous cell changes that in time can develop into tumors.

Cats with urinary tract obstructions can develop temporary or permanent kidney damage and dangerous heart rhythm changes.

Although it is beyond the scope of this entry to explain the following in the detail such a conclusion deserves, all ethical theories would require that developed nations to reduce their emissions to levels more stringent than levels of emissions reductions necessary to prevent dangerous climate change.

Among other things, for instance, the parties to the UNFCCC agreed that: (a) They would adopt policies and measures to prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system, (b) Developed countries should take the first steps to do this, and (c) Nations have common but differentiated responsibilities to prevent climate change, (d) Nations may not use scientific uncertainty as an excuse for not taking action, and (e) Nations should reduce their GHG emissions based upon «equity.»

In other words, to promote our own security, the United States and other rich countries may have to forge a partnership with China, India and others to develop a full range of creative ideas, technologies and policies to prevent dangerous climate change.

It also calls for 100 percent renewable energy by 2050 and financing to help developing nations adapt to the hazards of a changing climate: persistent drought, extreme heat, dangerous storms, and rising seas.

Although President Obama defended the new rules on the basis that they were necessary to prevent dangerous climate change, that time was running out to do so, and that the rules would protect human health of US citizens, the speech failed to develop some of the obvious profound implications for climate policy of the conclusion that climate change is a moral problem, although President Obama did assert twice in the speech that climate change is a moral problem.

Thus the United States, more than any other developed country, has been responsible for the disastrous 30 year delay in formulating a serious global response to climate change, while delays make the problem harder and more expensive to solve and increase the likelihood of triggering dangerous climate change.

(a) They would adopt policies and measures to prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system; (b) Developed countries should take the first steps to prevent dangerous climate change; (c) Nations have common but differentiated responsibilities to prevent climate change; (d) Nations may not use scientific uncertainty as an excuse for not taking action; and, (e) Nations should reduce their ghg emissions based upon «equity.»

For many the Copenhagen Accord was seen as a tragic failure because it failed to: (a) achieve once again enforceable ghg emissions reduction commitments from developed countries sufficient to prevent dangerous climate change, (b) identify dedicated sources of funding for adaptation or capacity building in vulnerable developing countries, or (c) stop the deforestation that is a major contributor to climate change.

During the Copenhagen conference representatives from poor vulnerable nations begged developed countries to: (a) commit to reduce GHG emissions to levels necessary to prevent dangerous climate change; and (b) to fund adaptation programs in developing countries that are necessary to protect the most vulnerable from climate change impacts that could be avoided or compensate for the damages that could not be avoided.

Roberts, quoting climate scientists Kevin Anderson and Alice Bows, argues, that the «brutal logic» of climate change «suggests (extremely) dangerous climate change can only be avoided if economic growth is exchanged, at least temporarily, for a period of planned austerity» in the world's developed nations.

This is so because of the huge differences in per capita emissions between developed and developing countries and the need to reduce total global emissions by 60 to 80 % from global total emissions to prevent dangerous climate change.

Yet, since the world averages 6.5 CO2 tons of per capita emissions while countries like the United States are emitting 19 tons per capita, and the world must reduce per capita emissions to perhaps less than 2.0 tons per capita to prevent dangerous climate change, it is very unlikely that many groups or people in developed countries can make a respectable argument that they are already below their fair share of safe global emissions.

As we have previously explained in EthicsandClimate.org there is now a scientific consensus that developed countries must limit their ghg emissions by as much as 25 % to 40 % below 1990 emissions levels by 2020 and between 80 % and 95 % below1990 levels by 2050 to have any reasonable chance of avoiding dangerous climate change which would require atmospheric ghg concentrations to be stabilized at 450 ppm.

Why Europe needs three ambitious and binding targets for 2030 to cut greenhouse gas emissions, save energy and develop renewable energies to avoid dangerous levels of climate change.

Already in 2007, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) recommended that, to minimise the risk of «dangerous» climatic change, developed countries need to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by 25 - 40 % byChange (IPCC) recommended that, to minimise the risk of «dangerous» climatic change, developed countries need to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by 25 - 40 % bychange, developed countries need to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by 25 - 40 % by 2020.

John Sterman: «It is dangerous for our leaders to count on emissions cuts that have not been pledged as if they will somehow occur automatically when those cuts require tough negotiations, greater funding and technology transfer for developing nations, and big changes in public opinion.»

The world's population could live a prosperous, European - style lifestyle by 2050 at the same time as avoiding dangerous climate change, according to a new Global Calculator developed by the UK's Department for Energy and Climate Change (change, according to a new Global Calculator developed by the UK's Department for Energy and Climate Change (Change (DECC).

OWL is a better version developed specifically for the project that will enable residents to see a simulation of the dangerous impacts of global warming and climate change.

«We develop strategies which, in the first instant, change the environment for the person so that the environment is better able to meet the person's needs, and less likely to give rise to the person needing to use that particularly maladaptive, disruptive or dangerous behaviour,» Professor McVilly says.