Sentences with phrase «developed by the family court»

This pamphlet draws from materials developed by Family Court Services, 11th Judicial Circuit, Miami - Dade County, Florida.

Not exact matches

A recent court decision added fuel to the fire by awarding compensation to the family of a young girl who developed autism symptoms after being vaccinated.

The referring court also enquired, cryptically, whether it may apply «more extensive notions of inhuman treatment or family at variance with the interpretation developed by the European Court of Human Rights&racourt also enquired, cryptically, whether it may apply «more extensive notions of inhuman treatment or family at variance with the interpretation developed by the European Court of Human Rights&raCourt of Human Rights»?

Collaborative divorce is a process by which parties, instead of going to court to litigate, agree to a private framework that lends itself to developing more creative options for financial, child custody, and other family issues.

These include Community Legal Education Ontario, the Legal Services Society of British Columbia, the Paralegal Litigation Users Group in Vancouver (mostly volunteers), Nova Scotia Legal Aid, and some new family law sites being developed by courts and government.

Developed by the Court's Children & Families staff and Case Management staff, the Desktop Guide for Juvenile Court Clerks offers simple direction to complete tasks required of juvenile court clerks and other juvenile court persoCourt's Children & Families staff and Case Management staff, the Desktop Guide for Juvenile Court Clerks offers simple direction to complete tasks required of juvenile court clerks and other juvenile court persoCourt Clerks offers simple direction to complete tasks required of juvenile court clerks and other juvenile court persocourt clerks and other juvenile court persocourt personnel.

The Society was incorporated in September 2009 and has developed Guidelines for Parenting Coordination as the practice standards of the Society, which were adopted and modified from a version originally created by the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts.

This in - depth Family Law Primer was held again in April 2008 and, for the first time, was jointly developed and delivered by and for the judges of both the Ontario Court of Justice and the Superior Court of Justice.

Court user surveys developed by Julie and John will be administered to SRLs attending Halifax Family Court both before and after the new training to assess the impact of the new guidelines on user satisfaction.

Subsequently, the Ministry of Justice funded a project designed to explore the processes by which experts are appointed in light of the new rules and to develop an understanding of the contribution experts make to just and timely decisions in the family court.

Although the autonomous concept of «home» has been liberally interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights («ECtHR»), it is interesting to note that such a high - security setting, which deprives people of their liberty and imposes medical treatment for mental disorder, could be regarded as «the place... where private and family life develops» (Gomez v Spain (2005) 41 EHRR 40 at para 53).

Family Law for the People was developed by the Department of Family Administration of the Administrative Office of the Courts — Programs, the Family and Juvenile Law Section of the Maryland State Bar Association and the People's Law Library of Maryland.

These classes were developed by Bill Eddy, president of the High Conflict Institute and the developer of the New Ways for Families method, which has been used by Family Court systems as well as counselors, lawyers and families out oFamilies method, which has been used by Family Court systems as well as counselors, lawyers and families out of cCourt systems as well as counselors, lawyers and families out ofamilies out of courtcourt.

New Ways for Families, a program of High Conflict Institute, was developed by Bill Eddy to manage high - conflict personalities in family court.

This book by the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges, commonly called the Greenbook, provides communities a framework to develop interventions and measure progress as they seek to improve their responses to families experiencing spouse abuse and child maltreatment.

In 2005, a task force of the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts developed Guidelines for Parenting Coordination that have been promulgated by the organization.

The Guidelines for Parenting Coordination developed by the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts» (AFCC) Task Force on Parenting Coordination describes parenting coordination as «a child - focused alternative dispute resolution process in which a mental health or legal professional with mediation training and experience assists high - conflict parents to implement their parenting plan by facilitating the resolution of their disputes in a timely manner, educating parents about how their children's needs can best be met.»

2013 Report to the Pennsylvania State Roundtable: «Visitation Is a Right, not a Privilege» (PDF - 811 KB) Office of Children and Families in the Courts (2013) Provides a report that presents best practices around visits and oversight developed by the Pennsylvania Visitation Workgroup.

(Developed by a Florida marriage & family therapist and educator, the course guarantees its materials and certificate of completion satisfy all courts» divorce and parenting education class requirements.)

That effort gave rise to a project by the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges to train judges to convene diverse stakeholders in their communities to review data and develop new protocols and supports to reduce suspensions, expulsions, and arrests in schools.

The challenges posed by high - conflict families were front - and - center issues for most courts, and AFCC members led the way in developing new processes and techniques for working with these challenging families.

Over time, with the passage of the Family Support Act of 1988 requiring all states to develop and implement formulas to compute the amount of money that should be sent by the «absent» parent (yes indeed, the statutory language assumes one parent is absent), the court - based child support system for divorcing or never married parents turned into a bureaucratic system with draconian powers to garnish wages, take tax refunds, licenses and impose other punishments for people who fail to properly support their children.

The use of custody evaluations, overshadowed by the advent of mediation, was reemerging as custody disputes were becoming more complex and high - conflict... AFCC entered the 1990s, its growing membership was being professionally challenged by increasingly difficult family issues... The challenges posed by high - conflict families were front - and - center issues for most courts, and AFCC members led the way in developing new processes and techniques for working with these challenging family members.

Dr. Stahl adheres to the standards for child custody evaluation developed by the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts, the American Psychological Association, and the California Center for Families, Children and the Courts.