Not exact matches
In recent days, a new push is being made to unlink the
development and approval of
teacher performance reviews with a boost in state aid.
A
performance review of career
teachers needs to be conducted once every three years and include classroom observation of the
teacher, a
review of the
teacher's progress on the Iowa teaching standards and additional standards and criteria, a
review of the implementation of
teacher's individual professional
development plan, and supporting documentation from other evaluators,
teachers, parents, and students.
They must also create comprehensive systems of
teacher and principal
development, evaluation and support that include factors beyond test scores, such as principal observation, peer
review, student work, or parent and student feedback... they must set new
performance targets for improving student achievement and closing achievement gaps.
Learn how technology helps empower
teachers by integrating key data from
performance reviews, student achievement and professional
development plans.
Schools and districts, in developing and refining the professional
development system, shall also
review and monitor school discipline data; school environment surveys; assessments of parental satisfaction;
performance appraisal data of
teachers, managers, and administrative personnel; and other
performance indicators to identify school and student needs that can be met by improved professional
performance.
Likewise, when
performance reviews, student achievement and professional
development are addressed independently, administrators and
teachers don't get the full story and aren't able to maximize teaching outcomes.
No state bases more than 50 percent of a
teacher's evaluation on student
performance scores (see the infographic on p. 4), and many incorporate multiple additional measures, such as classroom observations, student writing and artwork,
teacher lesson plans, peer
review, student reflections and feedback, and participation in professional
development (Shakman et al., 2012).
In
performance reviews, student achievement and professional
development are addressed independently, administrators and
teachers don't get the full story and aren't able to maximize teaching outcomes.
Together, they fill a whiteboard with interconnected professional
development opportunities for their
teachers over the next eight weeks: a morning meeting and daily classroom coaching sessions, weekly peer meetings, the filming of
teachers for an all - faculty critique, monthly
performance reviews, visits to higher - performing schools, potlucks, and happy hours.
The district's
performance review system for
teachers and administrators — which is in its second year of testing and
development — uses standardized test scores as one measure of how much a
teacher has helped students progress.
The state requires orientation for all
teachers new to the local system; ongoing support from a mentor, including regularly scheduled meetings during non-instructional time, co-teaching opportunities, an ongoing professional
development, and ongoing formative
review of new
teacher performance.
It is intended that these frameworks will be used to
review and plan courses for trainee
teachers, support
teacher performance related
development and support best practice.