While it is important for us to earn profits from our smart
device business alone, our primary objective is to encourage smart device users to be interested in and to play with our dedicated video game systems, and we are focused on this goal.
Its funny the rest of the world outside of the U.S does not subscribe to this smear b.s you all are into — since blackberry is a excellent
device and has been in
business since 1984, I highly doubt any of you can say the same, let
alone create a successful
device.
Although I am aware of the often - repeated statement that personal rights are more important than property rights, where the owner has stored his valuables representing his life's accumulations, his livelihood
business, his tools and implements, and his treasured antiques as appears in the case at bar, and where the evidence is sufficient to sustain a finding that the installation was intended only as a warning to ward off thieves and criminals, I can see no compelling reason why the use of such a
device alone would create liability as a matter of law.