Sentences with phrase «device product liability»
She focuses her practice on the representation of injured parties in professional negligence and personal injury litigation, pharmaceutical and medical device products liability litigation.
cprlaw.com
Our long - standing experience with medical device product liability cases means we are expertly placed to provide all of the help and support you need when making a claim for compensation.
He focuses his practice on defective drug and medical device products liability cases.
About Blog This publication offers insight and commentary regarding the defense of pharmaceutical and medical device product liability litigation.
He, along with Anthony Vale, is the author of Drug and Medical Device Product Liability Handbook.
His work includes medical device product liability work, produce liability work in other spheres, public procurement disputes, professional negligence, construction disputes, technology development disputes, commercial contract disputes, shareholder and partnership disputes, financial and banking litigation, professional regulation and disciplinary, fraud and judicial review.
Obtaining a favourable ruling for one of the world's leading manufacturers of life - saving cardiac devices dismissing the claim after an 18 - month trial, in the first medical device product liability class action to go to trial in Canada.
Top talent at the firm includes distinguished trial lawyer Michael Lehman, who heads the firm's medical malpractice and physician advocacy group and is considered a top expert in the state in high - stakes medical malpractice cases, pharmaceutical and medical device product liability claims and litigation related to the aviation industry.
The clinic also handles other cases involving Social Security disability benefits, long term disability benefits, and medical device product liability cases.
He is the author of, among other things, Drug and Medical Device Product Liability Handbook (2004)(with Anthony Vale).
They wrote almost exclusively about the defense of pharmaceutical and medical device product liability.
She has handled research and writing tasks in many types of cases, including automobile product liability, eminent domain / condemnation, medical device product liability, employment, commercial, premises liability, and asbestos litigation.
Medical device products liability is based on the same fundamentals as any other products liability case, but has the added complexity of needing medical experts and dealing with the hurdle of FDA approval.
Co-author (with Elizabeth Wright, Elizabeth Gobeil and Anthony Rospert), «Off - Label Issues in Drug and Medical Device Product Liability Litigation,» 2006 ACI Conference paper
«Off - Label Issues in Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Product Liability Litigation,» ACI Drug and Medical Device Conference, December 2006
She has extensive experience in automotive, aviation, and pharmaceutical and medical device product liability litigation, and represents manufacturers of aircraft components, airframes, medical devices, pharmaceuticals, and other commercial and consumer products.
James M. Beck, a Counsel resident in the Philadelphia office of Reed Smith, offers his personal views on various topics that focus on the defense of pharmaceutical and medical device product liability litigation.
In drug and device product liability litigation, discovery burdens are unequal and fall more heavily on defendants, and there is no reason to think that will change under the MIDPP.
The first of these is going to address Twombly / Iqbal pleading decisions in drug / device product liability cases (that means Rule 8, not Rule 9 (b)-RRB-.
This blog contains the personal views of the Blogging Team identified below (and of any authors of guest posts) concerning various topics that arise in the defense of pharmaceutical and medical device product liability litigation.
Growing profile in other industry sectors, with notable highlights in toxic tort and medical device product liability.»
Oct. 19, 2017), likewise recognized the demise of the presumption against preemption in a medical device product liability case.