Sentences with phrase «diagnostic groups»

A second goal of the project was to understand the unique patterns of social - emotional strengths and weaknesses in different diagnostic groups.

In this study the influence of motivation on rehabilitation outcomes on several diagnostic groups was investigated.

Compared the psychological functioning of mothers between diagnostic groups on measures of parenting sense of competence, coping, marital adjustment, family functioning, mother - child relationship, and social support.

Path analysis was conducted to examine the relation between strategy use and symptom severity across diagnostic groups.

Mothers of young adults with ASD reported greater levels of behavioural problems and poorer wellbeing compared to other diagnostic groups.

In an own study such a short instrument was needed, and a motivation questionnaire with 8 items was developed and tested on several diagnostic groups.

Parental warmth and parental criticism scores were only available for diagnostic groups and, therefore, not included in models assessing predictors against controls

Predictors included pre - and perinatal risk factors (pregnancy duration, birth weight, maternal smoking during pregnancy), transgenerational factors (parental ADHD; parental warmth and criticism in diagnostic groups), and postnatal risk factors (parental socioeconomic status [SES], adverse life events, deviant peer affiliation).

The most common disorders were grouped into 3 main diagnostic groups: Emotional disorders (24.0 %), ADHD (19.0 %), and Behavioural disorders (21.5 %).

«The sheer number of experiments undertaken and the sorting of results by many of the top diagnostics groups in Germany and beyond was extremely time consuming but also informative as to what we can and can not do with current technologies.

The sample was limited to four most prevalent diagnostic groups — mental and musculoskeletal disorders, traumas and tumours.

Common diagnostic groups paediatric occupational therapists work with include children with developmental delays, cerebral palsy, autism, and those whose ability to participate in play and daily activities is interrupted by an injury or disease process.

Results: The four diagnostic groups did not differ significantly in the prevalence of somatoform complaints

Demonstrations by trainers with participants playing patients from their clinical population are used to demonstrate adapting GST interventions for the presenting modes of various diagnostic groups.

Diagnostic groups within the autism spectrum, as specified in the fourth edition of the Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM - IV), 7 as well as the combined ASD group (consistent with fifth edition of the DSM8) were examined, to facilitate comparisons over time.

The PBS significantly differentiates diagnostic groups (Lindgren & Koeppl, 1987; Mayes, Calhoun, & Crowell, 2001), internal consistency for subscale scores is high (median coefficient.91), and inter-rater reliability for mothers and fathers is.71 (Lindgren & Koeppl, 1987).

The occurrence of psychiatric comorbidities was assessed in four major diagnostic groups: anxiety disorders, depressive disorders, ADHD and oppositional defiant disorder / conduct disorder.

Compared measured of depressive symptoms, pessimism and coping (emotion - focused, problem - focused) among diagnostic groups.

Results of these comparisons showed that the subsamples were still matched for age, gender, IQ, and ADHD - type (for diagnostic groups), and showed similar group comparison results in terms of ADHD symptom and ODD symptom levels, as shown in Table 1.

As was the case with the internalizing / externalizing scales, many of these broad - band measures have successfully discriminated between different diagnostic groups (concurrent / predictive validity) and they tend to be significantly associated with other measures purported to be measuring the same constructs (i.e., convergent validity; range =.03 — .92; median =.42).

In addition, Reactive attachment disorder (RAD) was diagnosed in 19.4 % of the children, of whom 58.5 % had comorbid disorders in the main diagnostic groups.

They also found many metabolites had statistically significant differences in pair-wise comparisons between the three diagnostic groups.

In the Nicaraguan samples, distinct metabolic clusters were associated with the three different diagnostic groups.

Health anxiety scores dropped significantly from index consultation to later follow - up in all diagnostic groups.

The diagnostic group characteristics and comorbidity between diagnoses are shown in Table 1.

All diagnostic groups had statistically significant improvements in PCS scores from index to later follow - up times.

Although patients with somatoform disorders did not report more physical complaints than the other three diagnostic groups they were more concerned with cognitions with regard to pain symptoms (p ⩽ 0.001).

In this research there was no difference between the experienced parenting stress between the two diagnostic groups.

The correlations computed for each diagnostic group separately were conducted on smaller numbers of participants and thus obviously subject to power problems.

All analyses were carried out blind to the participant's demographic information and diagnostic group.

The 3 (diagnostic group) × 2 (age group) MANCOVA only revealed a significant main effect of diagnostic group [F (8,440) = 10.95, p <.001, η2 = 0.017].

Displays estimated means and standard error bars for a) EDE - Q global, b) shame, c) social safeness, d) received social support, and e) self - compassion at baseline, week 3, week 6, week 9, and week 12 for each diagnostic group.

Despite differences found through direct observation of parenting children in different diagnostic groups, they are not as strong as syndrome - group differences found through more commonly used self - report questionnaires assessing domains like parenting stress.

Data on risk factors were assessed for all groups, except for parental warmth and parental criticism, which were only available for the diagnostic groups.

The comorbidity rates among these 3 main groups were high: 30.4 % had disorders in 2 of these 3 diagnostic groups, and 13.0 % had disorders in all 3 groups.

In addition, parental criticism and warmth were only assessed in the diagnostic group, limiting our findings to the diagnostic groups comparison, and thus to predictors for comorbid ODD versus ADHD - only.

Data were available for the diagnostic groups only.

Participants were matched for age, gender, and ADHD - subtype (diagnostic groups), and did not differ in IQ.

Our first hypothesis that negative transgenerational influences and pre - and perinatal adversities would act as risk factors for the diagnostic groups was supported by our findings, since we found that parental ADHD acted as a relatively major risk factor within our models, showing the highest explained deviance for both diagnostic groups relative to the control group.

All groups were matched for age and gender, and the diagnostic groups were additionally matched for IQ and ADHD - subtype.