This is the basic problem in
any dialogue between believers and non-believers.
In his address, the French cardinal said that the Pope believes «that
dialogue between believers, based on love and truth, is the best way to contribute to the harmony, happiness and peace of the peoples of the earth.»
It is more clear to me now that actual
dialogue between believers and non-believers is a complete waste of time regarding religion, etc..
If her call for a renewal of the respectful
dialogue between believers and well - intentioned secularists were taken seriously, CST could bring the insights of John Paul II into a universally needed «critical analysis of the current capitalist system».
«In
dialogue between believers,» says Tauran, «it is understood that what is good for one is good for the other.
Not exact matches
«On 24 and 25 March, the Pontifical Council for Culture... will launch... the «Courtyard of the Gentiles», the aim of which is to promote
dialogue and encounter
between believers and non-
believers.
The show takes some liberties that should feel comfortable for all
believers, such as recreating imagined
dialogue between Thomas and the other disciples in the days
between Jesus» death and resurrection.
It would be interesting to see a
dialogue of posts
between believers of poorer nations with
believers of richer nations on these topics.
But it would also, he suggests, give us some sense of what any reasonable person would say about the historical Jesus and thus might provide «a starting point for
dialogue between Christians and Jews,
between various Christian confessions, and
between believers and nonbelievers.»