Sentences with phrase «dictatorship does»

Others say the communist party dictatorship does not care about anything in the future, really, except maintaining its power under the sulfurous skies.

As often as I've tried to impose it on my husband, my shoe dictatorship doesn't always stand.

Dictatorship does not equal democracy.

The Arsenal fans rarely express their opinion with boos and banners (who were confiscated at some games so that nobody expresses anything against him — kinda like a dictatorship don't you think?)

Dictatorships do not allow people to change their minds.

It's no surprise, then, when these online dictatorships don't get the desired traffic.

Dictatorships don't usually arrive by coup but by bits and pieces and everyone thinks, sheesh, your being alarmist when the thugs act like thugs because there is no violence today.

Not exact matches

Does a brutal dictatorship in the Horn of Africa, featuring systematic slavery and more generally an awful record of human rights abuse sound like a place you want to do business?

A lot of outsiders do seem to think the dictatorship can be brought down by breaking its monopoly on information.

And we had to do this without establishing a dictatorship.

The real dilemmas have to do not with the fact that there are brutal dictatorships in the world, but with the fact that the governments of the world are spread along a spectrum, from fair and democratic to violent and totalitarian.

Maduro, whose regime has been widely labeled a dictatorship, didn't say whether the cryptocurrency would be used by ordinary Venezuelans to buy groceries, medicines or other basics.

There are also countries run by Kings (a form of dictatorship, depending on what political science book you read) that are our allies and doing as well for their people as congress does for ours.

The political regime that applied itself to the plan of Jeffrey Sachs did not take the form of dictatorship.

Citizens of the dictatorship are forced to worship the Kim family, and anyone who does not is subject to immediate punishment — arrest, torture or death, which could come in the form of a public execution.

Muslims will NEVER be Americans!!!! They don't have the capacity to understand freedom and democracy!!!! Only through Jesus can anyone understand the concept of freedom!!!! There's a reason why all of the free nations in the world are Christian and all of the dictatorships are Muslim or communist (atheist)!!!!

He doesn't seem to know the basic difference between failed dictatorships where freedom was not present and atheism.

Terrorists or dictatorships who persecute innocent people because they claim it's part of faith are not welcomed — their use of Islam as a scapegoat, does not make Islam what they portray it to be, in fact those false persecutors will be punished themselves by God, «God is the only judge.

I agree with him, but the struggle for religious freedom must be done with care, or else it will actually contribute to the dictatorship of relativism.

U.S. policy toward Latin America has fluctuated between open support of dictatorships and hostility toward movements of liberation, and advocacy of a «restricted democracy,» in which a limited amount of political space is allowed so long as it does not rock the boat too much internally and in the hemisphere.

Maybe one day humanity will have a world government, but the way things are being done, it would only be a worthless world dictatorship or totalitarian regime.

This is the difference between believers and us sensible informed people, we do nt hate you — we just want you to stop bothering us with your silly book and trying to make our country like some islamic dictatorship.

Although Thomas did not oppose the CIO role in overturning the communist Arbenz government in Guatemala in 1954, he totally rejected Rafael Trujillo's cruel and absolute dictatorship in the Dominican Republic and expressed grave concern about the United States's general failure to oppose right - wing Latin American dictatorships.

But Christians did broadly endorse democratic reforms that would bring an end to dictatorship.

What it does is like dictatorships to mass killing which is something most people ought to know.

That was under communist dictatorship, for those here, who don't remember dealing with that sort of thing.

Hi, I have a lovely friend from Zimbabwe who is studying for pastor.I don't know if you are aware the awful state of his country under a dictatorship.

the right to defend oneself is the reason their is right to bear arms and don't need to relyon gov «t - that is freedom american's seem to forget and main difference america and many military states and dictatorship gov» t in many countries.

Of course, it won't ultimately help them much; fundamentalist Muslims do not take kindly to Christians (or ancient archeological treasures that they consider idolatrous abominations, for that matter...) and brutal theocracy is the only alternative there to dictatorship; democracy is just not an option unfortunately.

It was religious before, and all that resulted was corrupt dictatorships that the Church supported, with extreme divides between rich and poor which religion did not alleviate, and extreme injustice which religion did not fight.

I said then: well, what else was she supposed to to single - handedly on top of what she did do??? Run for prime - minister, throw over the cast system, establish Mother Theresa's dictatorship... Paul would have gladly kept Onesimus.

Hey Joe Sardina... sorry I mean Giardina... what about all governmets in the business of killing kids, women and supporting dictatorships??? Remember Reagan??? Does Bush ring a bell?

If Saudi government is dictatorship or if there is no democracy in Egypt or if there are a new suicidal culture in Pakistan, don't blame the religion on this.

And for you to describe Cardinal Robert Sarah as an exponent of «bigotry» because he doesn't accept the New York Times's view of the moral life and cautions against the dictatorship of relativism borders on calumny.

I did not think it right to support the National Liberation Front, because its victory would necessarily result in the impoverishment of the French colons, in a dictatorship, and in far - reaching retrogression in every department of Algerian life.

Do you really believe that USA, a country that offers FREEDOM of pretty much everything to its people is no better than a dictatorship (Saudi Arabia) or a country run by religious fanatics (Iran)?

Eddie Howe MAY make an excellent future Arsenal Manager.Now is not his time.We have the money and (new) infrastructure in place to go forward as a club and to do this we need a Manager who is proven and understands the Big Club mentality that will go with the job.Steve McLarens opinion carries no weight and respect from anyone.We now have some very talented and highly respected people that were recruited by Ivan G to give us the backbone to finally move on from the One Man Dictatorship we have been forced to endure since the senseless departure of David Dein.They will identify the targets and I'm sure the list who WANT the job will be many.Eddie Howe will not make that list.Yet.

«Kids don't understand that it's supposed to be a dictatorship.»

Why does Arsenal FC run like a dictatorship country?

Keane said we don't have players with character, and he's spot on, but we don't have them because they will disrupt Arsene's dictatorship.

I urge Arsenal fans in the UK not to buy tickets and boycott Asenal matches, that way Arsenal board will respect the fans and not treat them with such disdain and impunity, this is outright dictatorship, and it has gone on long enough, Wenger should be out already, he is inept, what did he field the likes of Koscielny against Everton for, what where we playing for exactly?

These forces are at liberty to do everything in the shadows because the FA is useless, the PIGMOB is a dictatorship, the media have their own self - serving agenda, the authorities are too busy pretending to care, the EPL is image - conscious but in a negative way, the teams don't want to rock the boat (including Arsenal), some players are so greedy that bribing is easily inculcated, and so on.

Uly, the government is not always supposed to do what the people want — we have a constitution that limits what government may do, which is the real difference between us and a dictatorship.

Given Kim's apparent immaturity and lack of restraint, it's hard to imagine any solution satisfactory to the rest of the world, that doesn't involve removing Kim Jong Un, and the dismantling of the hereditary dictatorship that put such an inexperienced and temperamental person in such a position.

In that regard, any ruling party that is powerful of it's own - i.e., has intrinsic power not derived from voters; a power to stick to ruling despite the changing desires of people - is antidemocratic; so a «democracy through strength» is a danger that might (not always, but a possibility) turn into a dictatorship; and a «democracy through weakness» which is unable to do so and needs to re-estabilish it's power (and right to exist) at every single elections is a preferrable system of governance that would pay more attention towards their people, and be better for the people (as opposed to their own nomenclature).

if someone doesn't know why is being president for life is such a big deal, then he probably doesn't know why dictatorship is a big deal and he probably doesn't know what freedom is too.

¹ — it does not actually matter whether or not this constitutional change makes China a dictatorship.

Is there any reason to assume that Paris Commune would have survived with no slide to dictatorship any better than French Revolution did?

Welcome to dictatorship (anytime you prevent your citizens who wish to leave for greener pastures from doing so by threat of force, you are a closer to authorian than free state).

«This is not a dictatorship... We should do our own budget between the Assembly and Senate.