«The trouble is, this is a football club that expects their team to attack and their fans will go berserk if Mourinho tells his team to play as negatively as
they did against Man City a few months back and end up losing again.»
he did against Man U and Southampton and against Spurs 97 % pass rate.
«You want Mesut to score as well in a big game and
he did that against Man United,» he said.
The second - placed Gunners take on the second - from - bottom Clarets in North London, but can Burnley's survival instincts kick in as
they did against Man City recently?
the way to destroy chelsea today is to do the same 20 minutes
we did against Man Utd... pace and intensity form the word go..
Ozil is a fantastic player but jest needs to learn that the PL, requires even attacking midfielders to do their share defensively as well, like Santi
did against Man City... Sanchez does it every game, and he's our most valuable attacking player at the moment...
if we play every game with a game plan — like
we did against Man City away, don't see y we cant do well.
I agree lets see how he does against chelsea liverpool, and lets see if he can replicate what
he did against man city again before we start praising him.
Against lower opposition we can play our fluid passing game but switch tactics against the big teams — like
we did against Man City.
Face it, if we play like
we did against Man United, we could beat any team in the world never mind Watford!
In a cup final we put out a team, that has lost all belief in themselves and in their manager, and it performs worse than a league one time
did against Man City a few days before.
Not if Arsenal play the way
we did against Man City.
@Charlie maybe you are right... if we go in with all we have got and fire up with all unit we can still go through in CL only if we fire up like
we did against Man U-Dive.
They did against Man City and Liverpool and it wouldn't surprise me one bit if we upset them.
If we play like
we did against Man City, where everyone turn up and with the pressure on ManUtd to attack us, we can win this game.
As Arsenal are at home the onus will be on us to try and break down the Chelsea defence, and I am sure that Mourinho will set his team up to soak up the pressure as
they did against Man United last weekend.
He very lazy, can't mark, dosint track back...... I bet you if u play podi at left back u will not find his there, what per
did against man u was just a tip of the ice bug.....
If he goes to Westham he might score against us like Welbeck has been
doing against man utd.
Yes, Chelsea park the bus whenever we play them, but
they do that against Man City too, they still score, because they have the quality.
While at times Stoke passed the ball very well, they didn't really threaten the goal, so if
we do that against Man City there's no reason why we can't get a result.
Not exact matches
Unfortunately, when it comes to looks, the deck is often stacked
against the majority of
men and women alike — namely the «normals,» or those don't resemble models or movie stars.
Vulture, or Adrian Toomes, played by a very well - cast Michael Keaton — who probably got this role for appearing as another
man with wings in «Birdman» — is one of the rare villains in the MCU that has a personal vendetta
against the superheroes who doesn't feel like a desperate tie - in.
The practice, he said, «benefits
men who don't feel the need to be at home looking after their children, and it discriminates
against women who will want to, obviously, look after the children that they have got.»
«Inappropriate sexual behavior» and «sexual misconduct» don't even come close to precisely describing the accusations
against these
men.
On the other hand, Diversified once hired a
man who went
against type because he
did so well on Natella's phone test, which entails several half days of cold calling potential clients.
Nothing
against distributors, it's just nice to be able to set our own prices, to not absorb the cost of a middle -
man, not have to raise our prices to support that... because when you
do, the consumer ends up paying that cost.
When you see that
men get richer by graft and by pull than by work, and your laws don't protect you
against them, but protect them
against you — when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self - sacrifice — you may know that your society is doomed.
And yet, when it comes to women and entrepreneurship, we still face a specific set of challenges that stack the odds
against us in a way that doesn't happen for
men.
Generally speaking this is
done by the same gender they have a preference for, sometimes not but it is rarely mentioned how often
men are forced
against their preference in prison by other
men.
If in the West you go to church and see a woman with her hair uncovered, the Igbo
man will have a prejudice
against it and ask the Igbo woman to dress like the white one
does.
(Can't expect decent people to fight next to coloreds, can't trust colored
men in a battle, don't use the army for liberal politics, the soldiers are
against it, the civilians don't know what they're
doing, there's a war on and this isn't the right time, etc.) It was wrong then and it is wrong now.
But until we come to the end of ourselves then we are going to
do and say what we want, even as it was with me: It's one thing to be a heathen, even as I was, but a whole other ball game to set our hearts on God and His truth; yet, that can only come when we are sick and tired of being sick and tired of our own lives and we just give up, we know then who has given up by the one they advocate for, even has given place to: Paul said; with my heart I want to
do what is right, but my flesh
does what I hate: This is when God's grace is sufficient, because our hearts are right with God, but our flesh is not: There is a war going on within these temples, therefore; even as our flesh wins out to
do what we hate, our hearts are set on God and His ways which has been established in the Word of Truth, which then causes us to stand and speak forth what we believe, even as this causes a rending to happen within us, for Christ to be formed in us this needs to be, as we come up in His glories even for a better resurrection for them who believe: The heart wars
against our flesh, even as Christ wars
against the
man of sin within: For out of the abundance of our hearts our mouth doth speak, therefore; if we speak not the Wholesome Words of our Lord, Then our hearts are still wicked: But to advocate for wickedness instead of Christ, one has become a teacher of lawlessness, he then advocates for the
man of sin: Many who have come out of religion has
done this, as they went from one mountain top «from the extreme right» of self exaltation (Religion) to the other mountain top «to the extreme left» of the (Heathen) and missed the valley in - between that is takes to humble us: One extreme to the other, and missed Jesus: Jesus is taking ones through the valley's to strip us down of all who we are before exalting us to be just as He, even as the Christ in us overcomes that
man of sin (Adam) through theses valleys of contrast that cause a rending to happen within; and when we are rent in two, we stand on His word of truth, so we too can become one with Him, even as Jesus is with our Father: This is how Christ is formed in us: Thank - you Father; in Jesus Name Alexandria
Yet, I cringe at the idea of comparing the two directly because the
man who made the comment
against these women doesn't know them.
That is why I speak out» Why don't you speak out
against the actions of the liberals that have
done the greatest harm known to
man.
You said, «Why don't you speak out
against the actions of the liberals that have
done the greatest harm known to
man.»
Oh, by the way:: [4.34]
Men are the maintainers of women because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping - places and beat them; then if they obey you,
do not seek a way
against them; surely Allah is High, Great.
I think the most common conception of what is happening here is that the «mean
men of the Vatican» are
doing evil
against the «poor old ladies» of the LCWR.
I've heard hundreds of stories from women who were held
against their will, married to much older
men with mutliple wives and ra - ped day in and day out and it all happens in the US daily and it is actually legal since these sects have the right to
do so.
While a paltry few of the hysterically accused may have committed crimes
against man, what they
did is most certainly NOT a sin in either in the Bible or in God's eyes.
People always ask why
did he not change the heart of
man, but why
did he not change my heart when I
did something
against my neighbour, or why
did he let someone get cancer or why
does he allow abortion.
I
do nt like facial hair on
men —
does not mean i am biased to
men who have facial hair or discriminate
against them — No.
Why
does a desert
man like Usama have some much grudge in his DNA
against the USA.
Yes well JFK
did nt worship a Racist Child Molester Named Bringum Young who took arms
against his country and is still called a Prophet and a great
man on the Mormon.org web site.
26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile passions: for their women changed the natural use into that which is
against nature: 27 and likewise also the
men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another,
men with
men working unseemliness, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was due.28 And even as they refused to have God in their knowledge, God gave them up unto a reprobate mind, to
do those things which are not fitting; 29 being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malignity; whisperers, 30 backbiters, hateful to God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31 without understanding, covenant - breakers, without natural affection, unmerciful: 32 who, knowing the ordinance of God, that they that practise such things are worthy of death, not only
do the same, but also consent with them that practise them.
The real reason everyone is
against polygamy is that it creates winners and losers in reproduction, and the
men who wrote the laws don't want to be losers.
Two comments.One, the atheist / materialist claims that he / she... «
Did «nt believe in free will»... O.K.Should we take that to mean some mindless, heretofore unknown force apllied those words in your behalf?Did someone put the proverbial «gun to your head «and force you to post your comments?we await you presumably forced answer with bated breath.Two.As for Mr.Gingrich, beware.Politics aside, the one question yet remains for Calista: How did you, a professed «devout «Roman Catholic, carry on a 6 - year affair with a man you knew was married?How does that square with the Biblical prohibition against committing adultery?Oh wait!I know!As a «devout «Roman Catholic you can sin with impunity; just go to your priest, say a couple of «hail Marys and Our Fathers», ask the priest to bless your sinning, and resume.Of course!I had forgetton how easily Catholics excuse their trangressions (ex opere operato, anyon
Did «nt believe in free will»... O.K.Should we take that to mean some mindless, heretofore unknown force apllied those words in your behalf?
Did someone put the proverbial «gun to your head «and force you to post your comments?we await you presumably forced answer with bated breath.Two.As for Mr.Gingrich, beware.Politics aside, the one question yet remains for Calista: How did you, a professed «devout «Roman Catholic, carry on a 6 - year affair with a man you knew was married?How does that square with the Biblical prohibition against committing adultery?Oh wait!I know!As a «devout «Roman Catholic you can sin with impunity; just go to your priest, say a couple of «hail Marys and Our Fathers», ask the priest to bless your sinning, and resume.Of course!I had forgetton how easily Catholics excuse their trangressions (ex opere operato, anyon
Did someone put the proverbial «gun to your head «and force you to post your comments?we await you presumably forced answer with bated breath.Two.As for Mr.Gingrich, beware.Politics aside, the one question yet remains for Calista: How
did you, a professed «devout «Roman Catholic, carry on a 6 - year affair with a man you knew was married?How does that square with the Biblical prohibition against committing adultery?Oh wait!I know!As a «devout «Roman Catholic you can sin with impunity; just go to your priest, say a couple of «hail Marys and Our Fathers», ask the priest to bless your sinning, and resume.Of course!I had forgetton how easily Catholics excuse their trangressions (ex opere operato, anyon
did you, a professed «devout «Roman Catholic, carry on a 6 - year affair with a
man you knew was married?How
does that square with the Biblical prohibition
against committing adultery?Oh wait!I know!As a «devout «Roman Catholic you can sin with impunity; just go to your priest, say a couple of «hail Marys and Our Fathers», ask the priest to bless your sinning, and resume.Of course!I had forgetton how easily Catholics excuse their trangressions (ex opere operato, anyone).
The «discernment letter» written by the six of them that night in Dallas, Texas will go down as one of the most ungodly acts
against a woman
done by
men who claim to be of God, progressive, pro-feminist, Christianity 21.
Man of himself is tempted to oppose God's will, to seek to
do his own will, to feel free only if he is autonomous; he sets his own autonomy
against the heteronomy of obeying God's will.
From Graeme Mark: Feminists have been good at pointing out male - leaning inequalities that run as deep in our consciousness as our language (one
man, one vote etc.)
Do you think there are any female - leaning inequalities where
men are discriminated
against?
It forces recognition of the fact that Jesus» teaching
did not center around such ideas as the infinite worth of personality, the cultivation of the inner life, the development of
man toward an ideal; that Jesus spoke rather of the coming Kingdom of God, which was to be God's gift, not
man's achievement, of
man's decision for or
against the Kingdom, and of the divine demand for obedience.